Hello all,
Not sure if I'm missing something here with spamd so I thought I'd ask
the experts. I have it setup with the default config file (snipped) ;
[fw1]# cat /etc/spamd.conf
all:\
:spamhaus:china:korea:
# Mirrored from http://spfilter.openrbl.org/data/sbl/SBL.cidr.bz2
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
I also have the relevant pf rule in place;
[firewall]# pfctl -vsn
rdr inet proto tcp from spamd to any port = smtp - 127.0.0.1 port 8025
[ Evaluations: 104628Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0
]
[ Inserted: uid 0 pid 25445 ]
i'm
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
I also have the relevant pf rule in place;
[firewall]# pfctl -vsn
rdr inet proto tcp from spamd to any port = smtp - 127.0.0.1 port 8025
[ Evaluations: 104628Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0
]
[ Inserted: uid
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see http://ordb.org/')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org',`Rejected - see
http://spamhaus.org/')dnl
Jun 17 19:49:29 inetmail sendmail[13126]: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=[210.213.176.247], arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=210.213.176.247.pldt.net
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
You mean a basic SMTP pass in ?
This has been allowing mail to the mailserver for years, its only this
week that I tried the Spamd thingo
pfctl -sr | grep -i smtp
pass in log quick on fxp0 proto tcp from any to any port = smtp flags
S/SA
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
You mean a basic SMTP pass in ?
This has been allowing mail to the mailserver for years, its only this
week that I tried the Spamd thingo
pfctl -sr | grep -i smtp
pass in log quick on fxp0 proto tcp from any to any port =
Steve Tornio wrote:
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see http://ordb.org/')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org',`Rejected - see
http://spamhaus.org/')dnl
Jun 17 19:49:29 inetmail sendmail[13126]: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=[210.213.176.247], arg2=127.0.0.4,
Steve Tornio wrote:
Because those addresses are in the XBL, not the SBL. The XBL is
populated by entries from the CBL, which are added when virus-like or
worm-like behavior is detected, and entries are removed at the first
request. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to try to create a
Tornio
Sent: vrijdag 17 juni 2005 15:36
To: Brian McKerr
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Snapshot from 03/June : spamd working ?
Because those addresses are in the XBL, not the SBL. The XBL is
populated by entries from the CBL, which are added when virus-like or
worm-like behavior is detected
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
This looks ok. I suggest you setup a local blacklist with an IP you
can use to connect to the mail machine. After that, use nc mailserver
25 from that IP to connect to the machine and you'll see what is
going on.
While playing with this myself, I
10 matches
Mail list logo