On Fri, 2023-10-27 at 10:49 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:54:28AM +0200, Justin Yates Fletcher
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:25 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:16 PM Justin Yates Fletcher
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:12
Just to say that I check my temperature monitor for the cpu you want a laptop,
you want a mini-pc for
what concern the personal use.
Different could be the story for the business case (servers). But recalling
also some monitoring software like
Nagios I do not think the suggestion results very
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:54:28AM +0200, Justin Yates Fletcher wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:25 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:16 PM Justin Yates Fletcher
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:12 +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Am 25.10.2023 um
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:25 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:16 PM Justin Yates Fletcher
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:12 +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:57 schrieb Theo de Raadt
> > > > :
> > > > Mike Fischer wrote:
> > > > > > Am
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:16 PM Justin Yates Fletcher
wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:12 +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> >
> > > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:57 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
> > > Mike Fischer wrote:
> > > > > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:29 schrieb Theo de Raadt
> > > We changed a lot of kernel
Mike Fischer writes:
>
> Could this be caused by something on the VMWare host machine? (The
> host seems to be operating at limit regarding RAM for example. But the
> VM is only using the normal percentage of its allocated RAM — way
> below 100% and very constant usage, no swap.)
>
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:12 +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
>
> > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:57 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
> >
> > Mike Fischer wrote:
> >
> > > > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:29 schrieb Theo de Raadt
> > > > :
> > > >
> > > > Mike Fischer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > True. But like I said, this was
> Am 25.10.2023 um 17:57 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>
> Mike Fischer wrote:
>
>>> Am 25.10.2023 um 17:29 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>>>
>>> Mike Fischer wrote:
>>>
True. But like I said, this was noticed because of the sudden increase on
the same (OpenBSD) machine without any obvious
> Am 25.10.2023 um 19:01 schrieb Janne Johansson :
>
> > I process that is started every 5 seconds and exits after 10ms
> > computation can cause the load to go up by 1. It just matters if it runs
> > during the sampling time or not. This is why the load avarage is not
> > accurate, it is an
>
> > I process that is started every 5 seconds and exits after 10ms
> > computation can cause the load to go up by 1. It just matters if it runs
> > during the sampling time or not. This is why the load avarage is not
> > accurate, it is an indication and if the value is below the number of
>
> Am 25.10.2023 um 17:59 schrieb Claudio Jeker :
>
> I process that is started every 5 seconds and exits after 10ms
> computation can cause the load to go up by 1. It just matters if it runs
> during the sampling time or not. This is why the load avarage is not
> accurate, it is an indication
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 05:24:50PM +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
>
> > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:07 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
> >
> > Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57:54AM +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> >>> I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on several
>
Mike Fischer wrote:
> > Am 25.10.2023 um 17:29 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
> >
> > Mike Fischer wrote:
> >
> >> True. But like I said, this was noticed because of the sudden increase on
> >> the same (OpenBSD) machine without any obvious reason.
> >
> > The reason is obvious.
> >
> > You
> Am 25.10.2023 um 17:29 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>
> Mike Fischer wrote:
>
>> True. But like I said, this was noticed because of the sudden increase on
>> the same (OpenBSD) machine without any obvious reason.
>
> The reason is obvious.
>
> You installed a completely different system.
No,
Mike Fischer wrote:
> True. But like I said, this was noticed because of the sudden increase on the
> same (OpenBSD) machine without any obvious reason.
The reason is obvious.
You installed a completely different system.
There is no SLA on keeping the load average code's calculation the
> Am 25.10.2023 um 17:07 schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57:54AM +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
>>> I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on several
>>> servers I administer and I am trying to find the cause. (I monitor these
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57:54AM +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> > I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on several
> > servers I administer and I am trying to find the cause. (I monitor these
> > machines so that I can implement corrective measures
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57:54AM +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on several
> servers I administer and I am trying to find the cause. (I monitor these
> machines so that I can implement corrective measures in case of any
> malicious or
> Am 25.10.2023 um 14:32 schrieb Dave Voutila :
>
>
> Mike Fischer writes:
>
>> I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on
>> several servers I administer and I am trying to find the cause. (I
>> monitor these machines so that I can implement corrective measures in
>>
Mike Fischer writes:
> I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on
> several servers I administer and I am trying to find the cause. (I
> monitor these machines so that I can implement corrective measures in
> case of any malicious or abnormal activity. I think this is
I have been observing occasional bouts of high load averages on several servers
I administer and I am trying to find the cause. (I monitor these machines so
that I can implement corrective measures in case of any malicious or abnormal
activity. I think this is benign, but I’d still like to find
21 matches
Mail list logo
