zeur here.
I now[0] see that a whole bunch of lists were Cc'd, and while I'm not
sorry for not preserving the Ccs, I realize that you might not have been
addressing us, misc@OpenBSD.org.
I still think my point holds, though. This should be a matter of great
concern for OpenBSD, like it is to
zeur here.
> This whole discussion is best served elsewhere.
Yeah, comfortably away from an affected project, for sure! Remember what
happened w/ ipf(4)? Now imagine peope getting angry at theo (not an
uncommon thing, given his behaviour), and retaliating by revoking their
license to crucial
call others as an idiot, as the only idiot here are you ;)
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 9:31 PM wrote:
> >
> > Why is no one discussing this anymore.
> >
> > It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
> > programmers.
> >
>
Waiting quietly for two months for Eben Moglen's preliminary write-up
(which I was to be sent to "correct") got me no-where. Every seems to
have concluded that the issue is settled since there was no more public
discussion.
All the "other side" said was "nuh-uh" and "you're not a lawyer"
This whole discussion is best served elsewhere.
On Thursday, December 27, 2018, wrote:
> Why is no one discussing this anymore.
>
> It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
> programmers.
>
> Are you idiots aware that programmers DO NOT K
Are you aware we are in the end of year holidays? I recommend you to
not call others as an idiot, as the only idiot here are you ;)
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 9:31 PM wrote:
>
> Why is no one discussing this anymore.
>
> It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG&q
Why is no one discussing this anymore.
It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
programmers.
Are you idiots aware that programmers DO NOT KNOW THE LAW simply by
virtue of being "smarts"?
Are you idiots aware that I am a lawyer, I have studie
7 matches
Mail list logo
