Re: Wondering about usage of /usr/bin v /usr/local/bin...

2007-01-04 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Craig Skinner wrote on Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:14:32PM +: On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: For example, on one small LAN with about 50 active users, i called that place /usr/usta: What does usta stand for? Oh, that's just kind of $site, see

Wondering about usage of /usr/bin v /usr/local/bin...

2007-01-03 Thread Dave Ewart
I'm fairly new to OpenBSD right now and at the stage where I'm trying to understand the differences between what I've been used to in the past (typically Debian) and OpenBSD. One thing I'm curious about is managing locally-maintained applications. Under Debian, anything that was core to the

Re: Wondering about usage of /usr/bin v /usr/local/bin...

2007-01-03 Thread Darren Spruell
On 1/3/07, Dave Ewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing I'm curious about is managing locally-maintained applications. Under Debian, anything that was core to the system went into /usr/bin, as did any Debian-supplied packages. In Debian, the location /usr/local is, by policy, never touched by

Re: Wondering about usage of /usr/bin v /usr/local/bin...

2007-01-03 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Dave, Dave Ewart wrote on Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:32:04PM +: I'm fairly new to OpenBSD right now and at the stage where I'm trying to understand the differences between what I've been used to in the past (typically Debian) and OpenBSD. Welcome. :-) One thing I'm curious about is