Hi.
On Fri, June 12, 2009 17:43, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:21:32 +0100
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>> > A port of this has already been posted a couple of times but,
>> > as someone said, it needs more work. The GUI tool fails for
reply-to's set.
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:43:08 +0300
> Thanasis wrote:
>> I downloaded the latest version of apcupsd from http://www.apcupsd.com
>> (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=54413)
>> and compiled and installed with gmake.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:43:08 +0300
Thanasis wrote:
> I downloaded the latest version of apcupsd from http://www.apcupsd.com
> (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=54413)
> and compiled and installed with gmake. Straightfoward.
> Communication with the UPS perfect from the first t
2009/6/12 Thanasis :
> Sorry, if I made you feel that way, but believe me, really, if I could
> do it (put apcupsd in the openbsd ports), I would happily do so.
> But not everyone is a developer ... O:-)
> PS: And thanks to every one for their help B :-)
>
>
http://openbsd.org/checklist.html
it's
Gender changers can be a nigthmare because, as FAQ mentions, 'that it
plugs doesn't mean it's going to work'.
If you miss any doc about serial port standards of any of the devices,
then take a multimeter and measure the voltage between pin 7 -if DB25-
or pin 5 -if DB9- and pin 2 of the cable;
on 06/12/2009 12:57 AM Daniel Ouellet wrote the following:
> Thanasis wrote:
>
>> on 06/11/2009 07:55 PM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
>>>
>>>
As I said, the compilation didn't need anything special, except perhaps
using gmak
Thanasis wrote:
> on 06/11/2009 07:55 PM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
>>
>>> As I said, the compilation didn't need anything special, except perhaps
>>> using gmake instead of make.
>>> That's all.
>>> So, it's minimum effort for someone experienced wit
on 06/11/2009 07:55 PM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
>
>> As I said, the compilation didn't need anything special, except perhaps
>> using gmake instead of make.
>> That's all.
>> So, it's minimum effort for someone experienced with the ports system
>> an
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
As I said, the compilation didn't need anything special, except perhaps
using gmake instead of make.
That's all.
So, it's minimum effort for someone experienced with the ports system
and with the Makefile(s) to put it in.
:-)
So, I have to respond. This is
on 06/11/2009 05:48 PM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
>
>> on 06/11/2009 02:03 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
> SNIP
>>> Thanks Diana. I checked the pinout of the DB25-Male to DB9-Female, and
>>> also that of the gender changer and they appear good as fa
On 2009-06-11, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
>
>> on 06/11/2009 02:03 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
> SNIP
>>> Thanks Diana. I checked the pinout of the DB25-Male to DB9-Female, and
>>> also that of the gender changer and they appear good as far as
>>> continuity e
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Per FogelstrC6m wrote:
> APC uses different cabling for different UPS series. No supprises here
>
> Check out: http://www.nullmodem.com/ups.htm
>
> I got my Smartups to work ok after making my own cable.
>
> --
> Per
Yes, they do. Almost like the had different design tea
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
on 06/11/2009 02:03 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
SNIP
Thanks Diana. I checked the pinout of the DB25-Male to DB9-Female, and
also that of the gender changer and they appear good as far as
continuity exists between the pins as shown on the site you menti
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:46:06 -0600 (MDT), Diana Eichert
wrote:
> You don't need to measure voltages, just get the pinout for
> both serial cables and build your cable. The only time
> I measure voltage is when I don't have the docs.
>
> I have a bag of RJ45 <-> DB9 and RJ45 <-> DB25 adapters.
>
Are you running the program with a user with dialer privileges? First,
make sure your account has dialer privileges -is part of dialer group-.
Then Shortcut pins 2 and 3 of your black cable while connected to the
pc, and try on a shell 'cu -l /dev/ttyb'. If serial port is working, any
keyboard
on 06/11/2009 02:03 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
> on 06/10/2009 05:46 PM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
>
>>
>>
>> A quick search on Googley found
>> http://www.pitt.edu/~bdgregg/Cable_Wireing.html
>>
>> Remember real hardware hackers eat serial for breakfast.
>> :-)
>>
>> diana
>
on 06/10/2009 05:46 PM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
> You don't need to measure voltages, just get the pinout for
> both serial cables and build your cable. The only time
> I measure voltage is when I don't have the docs.
>
> I have a bag of RJ45 <-> DB9 and RJ45 <-> DB25 adapters.
> When I
Diana Eichert wrote:
Remember real hardware hackers eat serial for breakfast.
:-)
diana
lol! this made my morning diana.
cheers,
jake
You don't need to measure voltages, just get the pinout for
both serial cables and build your cable. The only time
I measure voltage is when I don't have the docs.
I have a bag of RJ45 <-> DB9 and RJ45 <-> DB25 adapters.
When I need to connect something via serial it's very
straightforward. Loo
on 06/10/2009 01:42 PM Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote the following:
> Gender changers can be a nigthmare because, as FAQ mentions, 'that it
> plugs doesn't mean it's going to work'.
>
> If you miss any doc about serial port standards of any of the devices,
> then take a multimeter and measure the vo
on 06/10/2009 01:37 PM Maurice Janssen wrote the following:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
>
>> I don't know if that matters, but let me add that the connection between
>> the sparc machine's port and the ups' port consists of two cables and a
>> gender changer in be
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
>I don't know if that matters, but let me add that the connection between
>the sparc machine's port and the ups' port consists of two cables and a
>gender changer in between, like so:
>On the sun's port side the plug is a DB25 and the other
If I disconnect the cable, and then run (as root) apc-upsd I get an
answer, although it's "zero" stats.
Does that say anything?
# apc-upsd
/etc/apc-upsd.conf, 55 lines:
==
device ... /dev/ttyb
pidfile .. /var/run/upsd.pid
exec scrip
on 06/10/2009 11:53 AM Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote the following:
> Are you running the program with a user with dialer privileges?
I run apc-upsd as root.
on 06/10/2009 12:34 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> on 06/10/2009 11:53 AM Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote the following:
>
>> Are you running the program with a user with dialer privileges? First,
>> make sure your account has dialer privileges -is part of dialer
>> group-. Then Shortcut pins 2
on 06/10/2009 11:53 AM Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote the following:
> Are you running the program with a user with dialer privileges? First,
> make sure your account has dialer privileges -is part of dialer
> group-. Then Shortcut pins 2 and 3 of your black cable while connected
> to the pc, and try
on 06/10/2009 09:29 AM jared r r spiegel wrote the following:
> `make search' is awesome, but also check the Makefile for the
> port. or heck, on the $arch in question you could worst
> case try `make package' and see if it works. if it doesn't,
> the pkg is probably marked broken or some
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:01:38AM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> on 06/10/2009 01:45 AM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
> >
> > Look in the Makefile for the port and see if the sparc platform is
> > excluded. If not then build it yourself from ports.
> >
> > diana
+1.
diana is right a LOT.
>
on 06/10/2009 01:45 AM Diana Eichert wrote the following:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
>
>> But why isn't there a apc-upsd package in the packages for sparc, while
>> there is one for sparc64 ?
>
> Look in the Makefile for the port and see if the sparc platform is
> excluded. If not then
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Thanasis wrote:
But why isn't there a apc-upsd package in the packages for sparc, while
there is one for sparc64 ?
Look in the Makefile for the port and see if the sparc platform is
excluded. If not then build it yourself from ports.
diana
on 06/10/2009 12:46 AM Thomas Pfaff wrote the following:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:18:49 +0300
> Thanasis wrote:
>
>> Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
>>
>
> See http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=123100538732186&w=2
>
Is that a different port from
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:18:49 +0300
Thanasis wrote:
> Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
See http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=123100538732186&w=2
Otherwise there's sysutils/nut and sysutils/apc-upsd in ports.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:18:49PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
google lead me to: http://www.apcupsd.com/manual/manual.html#openbsd
and I see apc-upsd-19991128p0.tgz in the package list
on 06/09/2009 11:30 PM kell...@gmail.com wrote the following:
> Thanasis wrote (06/09/09 23:18):
>
>> Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
>>
>
> Yes, apc-upsd and nut. Go to:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/4.5_packages/i386.html
>
> for all of your pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanasis wrote:
Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
nut works well. Takes a bit of reading, if you're coming from apcupsd,
but it's very flexible.
- --
David Talkington
dt...@drizzle.com
- --
PGP key: http://
Thanasis wrote:
Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
Nut seems to work fine for me. It's in ports and available as package.
Maurice
Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
37 matches
Mail list logo
