Re: bgpd patch, WAS: bgpd causing black-holes with bgp-only setup

2007-11-12 Thread Tony Sarendal
On 11/12/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:26:47PM +0100, Tony Sarendal wrote: New version. Less duplication and a nice feature as bonus. With softreconfig in enabled the looped prefixes are accepted into the Adj-RIB-In. This means that I can tell if

Re: bgpd patch, WAS: bgpd causing black-holes with bgp-only setup

2007-11-11 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:26:47PM +0100, Tony Sarendal wrote: New version. Less duplication and a nice feature as bonus. With softreconfig in enabled the looped prefixes are accepted into the Adj-RIB-In. This means that I can tell if my neighbor AS is using a path via myself. Either I'm

Re: bgpd patch, WAS: bgpd causing black-holes with bgp-only setup

2007-11-06 Thread Tony Sarendal
diff -u version. /Tony Index: rde.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde.c,v retrieving revision 1.228 diff -u -r1.228 rde.c --- rde.c 16 Sep 2007 15:20:50 - 1.228 +++ rde.c 6 Nov 2007 10:38:23 - @@

Re: bgpd patch, WAS: bgpd causing black-holes with bgp-only setup

2007-11-06 Thread Tony Sarendal
New version. Less duplication and a nice feature as bonus. With softreconfig in enabled the looped prefixes are accepted into the Adj-RIB-In. This means that I can tell if my neighbor AS is using a path via myself. Either I'm tired or that is cool. router-02# bgpctl show rib 192.168.0.0

bgpd patch, WAS: bgpd causing black-holes with bgp-only setup

2007-11-05 Thread Tony Sarendal
I have not yet checked how other implementations handle the situation where an update with a as-path loop hides the fact that the neighbor just lost a path. But I made a quick patch if anyone feel like testing. The black-hole condition does not appear anymore when I test. Be gentle, I only