Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-21 Thread Damon McMahon
On 20 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:23:34PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: On 19 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29:56PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: Greetings,

Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-21 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:43:17PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: On 20 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:23:34PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: On 19 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On

Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-20 Thread Damon McMahon
On 19 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29:56PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: Greetings, I have a troublesome DHCP client -- a Brother MFC-9420CN multifunction centre -- I'd like to troubleshoot. It's being assigned a lease

Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-20 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:23:34PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: On 19 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29:56PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote: Greetings, I have a troublesome DHCP client -- a Brother MFC-9420CN multifunction

dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-19 Thread Damon McMahon
Greetings, I have a troublesome DHCP client -- a Brother MFC-9420CN multifunction centre -- I'd like to troubleshoot. It's being assigned a lease including IP address and gateway address by dhcpd(8), but not a subnet mask. Here's the relevant section of dhcpd.conf: shared-network THE_OFFICE_LAN

Re: dhcpd troubleshooting

2010-12-19 Thread Jan Stary
On Dec 19 22:29:56, Damon McMahon wrote: Greetings, I have a troublesome DHCP client -- a Brother MFC-9420CN multifunction centre -- I'd like to troubleshoot. It's being assigned a lease including IP address and gateway address by dhcpd(8), but not a subnet mask. Here's the relevant