On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:06:17AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
As a general matter, I'm a bit of a downer on ffs2 because I think
it's the wrong solution. FFS was (and is) great for its problem
domain, but outside the comfort zone it's not so hot.
there's always the possibility of trying to
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Pedro Martelletto
pe...@ambientworks.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:06:17AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
As a general matter, I'm a bit of a downer on ffs2 because I think
it's the wrong solution. FFS was (and is) great for its problem
domain, but outside
Before I screw up my filesystem, I would like to see if it's safe to
proceed. I have a 1TB FFS2 partition, which I'm about to grow to ~1.5TB
original disklabel:
a: 2097157167 63 4.2BSD 8192 655361
^
c: 39070310400 unused 0
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Aaron Stellman openbsd-m...@x96.org wrote:
Before I screw up my filesystem, I would like to see if it's safe to
proceed. I have a 1TB FFS2 partition, which I'm about to grow to ~1.5TB
Looks quite suspicious to me -- please comment.
even if it worked, you won't
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Aaron Stellman openbsd-m...@x96.org wrote:
Before I screw up my filesystem, I would like to see if it's safe to
proceed. I have a 1TB FFS2 partition, which I'm about to grow to ~1.5TB
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Denis Doroshenko
denis.doroshe...@gmail.com wrote:
even if it worked, you won't be able to run fsck after the fact.
could you please be more informative? won't it work because of FFS2 or
because of 1.5TB? it seems that the man page for growfs(8) doesn't say
a
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:06:17AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Denis Doroshenko
denis.doroshe...@gmail.com wrote:
even if it worked, you won't be able to run fsck after the fact.
could you please be more informative? won't it work because of FFS2 or
7 matches
Mail list logo
