On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Bruce Shaw wrote:
We've actually got several different problems here.
Specifically, the OpenBSD implementation we're seeing here seems to
provide sysctl style access to Sensor data, watchdog info, etc., but what
about other IPMI functions?
I've been working on better
What's wrong with?
# sysctl hw | grep ipmi
hw.sensors.0=ipmi0, Temp, OK, temp, 43.00 degC / 109.40 degF
hw.sensors.1=ipmi0, Planar Temp, OK, temp, 30.00 degC / 86.00 degF
hw.sensors.2=ipmi0, CMOS Battery, OK, volts_dc, 3.12 V
hw.sensors.3=ipmi0, Front Fan, OK, fanrpm, 1258 RPM
hw.sensors.4=ipmi0,
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 13:59, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On any number of occasions, I've offered personally to donate VMWare
licenses to Net-SNMP developers to help bring *BSD support back into the
mainstream :} ... That's a standing offer and I'm sure there are plenty
of corporations that
All:
Regarding the future of IPMI and SNMP, where do they intersect in the
evolution of enterprise free software (aka, BSD) ?
Specifically, the OpenBSD implementation we're seeing here seems to
provide sysctl style access to Sensor data, watchdog info, etc., but what
about other IPMI
4 matches
Mail list logo