Since I switched to the kernel pppoe I receive a lot errors with nmap. "Cannot determine route to %FOO".
For example with a bank-website: lynx www.cc-bank.de works perfectly nmap -P0 -sSV -p80 www.cc-bank.de does not work. nslookup www.cc-bank.de does work so it`s realy a neat routing issue. Another example with www.heise.de: sudo nmap -P0 -sS -sV -vvv www.heise.de Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-07-13 17:52 CEST WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.0.0.1 WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.0.0.0 nexthost: failed to determine route to 193.99.144.85 QUITTING! Please don`t get me wrong I just needed some Servers where I`m sure they where working. I tried it also with -e pppoe0 and later with fxp0 (wich failed, no Adress). godfather $ sudo nmap -e pppoe0 -P0 -sSV -p22,80 -vvv www.heise.de Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-07-13 17:58 CEST WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.0.0.1 WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to 0.0.0.0 DNS resolution of 1 IPs took 0.04s. Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against www.heise.de (193.99.144.85) [2 ports] at 17:58 The SYN Stealth Scan took 3.02s to scan 2 total ports. Host www.heise.de (193.99.144.85) appears to be up ... good. Interesting ports on www.heise.de (193.99.144.85): PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 22/tcp filtered ssh 80/tcp filtered http Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.127 seconds Raw packets sent: 4 (176B) | Rcvd: 0 (0B) godfather $ As you can see nmap displays everythign as filtered. It doesn`t matter wich IP I scan even if I would scan www.hotmail.com with Port 80 it would tell me it`s filtered. I`ve NO active pf and the only stuff I made was switching from userland pppd to Kernel pppd. Any hints to make nmap working? Kind regards, Sebastian p.s. OpenBSD AMD64/3.9-Stable with a current nmap-Port. (same result with 3.95 so doesn`t matter)
