Ray Garza wrote:
Hello folks,
/snipped
Question 1:
I would like to either place kids playing Runescape at the bottom of the
queue or reduce bandwidth. How do I get people using the web for other
than Runescape to have higher priority? Should I scrap this and go a
different route? Any
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 11:23, Ray Garza wrote:
---
Question 1:
I would like to either place kids playing Runescape at the bottom of the
queue or reduce bandwidth. How do I get people using the web for other
than Runescape to have higher priority? Should I scrap this and go a
On 2006/10/09 22:23, Ray Garza wrote:
I would like to either place kids playing Runescape at the bottom of the
queue or reduce bandwidth. How do I get people using the web for other
than Runescape to have higher priority? Should I scrap this and go a
different route? Any suggestions?
On 10/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
runescape played from the website is a java program, it connects
on ports 43594-43595 and 8010, those are the ports you would need to
throttle and are unlikely to affect standard web traffic.
Good info!
And ports 43594-43595 and 8010 are
On 10/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And ports 43594-43595 and 8010 are unlikely to affect *anything* else
-- IANA's well-known ports list shows them as unassigned. Odds are no
one else is using 'em.
I'd like to take back that last sentence. On second thought, it' a
stupid assumption
On 2006/10/10 12:54, ropers wrote:
On 10/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
runescape played from the website is a java program, it connects
on ports 43594-43595 and 8010, those are the ports you would need to
throttle and are unlikely to affect standard web traffic.
Since the
Hello folks,
I really have a two part question
I work at a Public Library with about 200 PC's available to the public
on a NAT (OpenBSD 3.8). We are connected to the Internet via 1-T1 line.
We have a lot of kids playing the online game Runescape
(www.runescape.com) and needless to say they are
7 matches
Mail list logo
