Hi All,
Likely something in my setup as /usr/src and /usr/obj are NFS mounts, but
curious if anyone has any thoughts on what might cause this?
Making all in doc
sed 's,@VERSION\@,1.11.1p1,g' /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc/CVSvn.texi.in
On Dec 08 08:19:53, njtaylor0...@btinternet.com wrote:
> Those files are generated and should be in /usr/obj/lib/libedit
On Dec 08 08:27:41, njtaylor0...@btinternet.com wrote:
> are you following current.html / new dedicated build user instructions?
Yes. Must have been some brakage in my tree
On 12/08/16 08:19, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> On 12/08/16 07:46, Jan Stary wrote:
>> After and update to yesterday's current/amd64 and a cvs up,
>> make build fails in libedit, saying:
>>
>> cc -O2 -pipe -g -Wall-I. -I/usr/src/lib/libedit -I.
>> -I/usr/src/li
On 12/08/16 07:46, Jan Stary wrote:
> After and update to yesterday's current/amd64 and a cvs up,
> make build fails in libedit, saying:
>
> cc -O2 -pipe -g -Wall -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libedit -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libedit
> -c /usr/src/lib/libedit/chared.c -o chared.o
> /usr/src/li
After and update to yesterday's current/amd64 and a cvs up,
make build fails in libedit, saying:
cc -O2 -pipe -g -Wall -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libedit -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libedit
-c /usr/src/lib/libedit/chared.c -o chared.o
/usr/src/lib/libedit/chared.c:46:20: error: common.h: No such file
I can confirm: make build fails if the umask is set to 077, succeeds
if set to 022.
Cheers,
b
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which
had a name of smime.p7s]
I just installed 4.5 yesterday from install45.iso on an old Dell
Precision laptop. dmesg here:
http://trumpetpower.com/pub/dmesg.boot
I unpacked source from the tarballs and did ``cvs -q up -rOPENBSD_4_5 -
PAd''
A new kernel built, installed, and booted just fine. However, every
time
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ben Goren b...@trumpetpower.com wrote:
...
A new kernel built, installed, and booted just fine. However, every
time I try to do a make build, it bombs out in the exact same spot.
I've re-run cvs without it finding any new / modified / deleted / etc.
files.
On 2009 May 18, at 4:27 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ben Goren b...@trumpetpower.com
wrote:
...
A new kernel built, installed, and booted just fine. However, every
time I try to do a make build, it bombs out in the exact same spot.
I've re-run cvs without it
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:05:18 +0100, Richie wrote
That is strange because i update the source via cvsup with this ...
[snip]
and i did what is in: http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html
The kernel dont have any problem.
I reboot and have this version: OpenBSD 4.4-stable (ATECH) #3: Tue
hi,
the ATECH kernel config is just a copy of DEFAULT i didn't change
anything yet.
i just did :
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf
# cp GENERIC.mp ATECH
# config ATECH
I did all the things described in FAQ5.3.5 .
This is the first time that occours. I did rebuild kernel / userland (
Hello all,
in make build i have this error:
(a lot of output)
pack.so pp_sort.so|tsort -q`
cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/obj exec make
makefile, line 952: Need an operator
makefile, line 953: Need an operator
makefile, line 956: Need an operator
makefile, line 957: Need an operator
makefile,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:16:59AM +0100, Richie wrote:
Hello all,
in make build i have this error:
(a lot of output)
pack.so pp_sort.so|tsort -q`
cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/obj exec make
makefile, line 952: Need an operator
...
[snip]
... someone have a clue about it ?
Clue? First a
On 2008-08-11, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 13:59 +0200, Miod Vallat wrote:
Until the cd-rom are actually created and the release is announced,
tags are
Just trying to be helpful in reporting a build-problem during the releng
cycle.
I think if
On 8/10/08, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 13:59 +0200, Miod Vallat wrote:
Until the cd-rom are actually created and the release is announced,
tags are
Just trying to be helpful in reporting a build-problem during the releng
cycle.
Since the
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:55:49 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote
Since the people building the release are building the release, it's
pretty likely they'll find out all on their own.
True. A couple of points which perhaps weren't articulated well at the
beginning of this thread:
First, -release is
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 13:59 +0200, Miod Vallat wrote:
Until the cd-rom are actually created and the release is announced,
tags are
Just trying to be helpful in reporting a build-problem during the releng
cycle.
If there's a better venue for such reports, lets have it :)
~BAS
IMPORTANT:
=== libreadline
mkdep -a -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/readline.c
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/funmap.c
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/keymaps.c
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/vi_mode.c
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/parens.c
There is no 4.4.
Oh yes there is
On 8 Aug 2008, at 12:28, Ted Unangst wrote:
There is no 4.4.
Beta and build?What a nice type of Sci-Fi ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: OpenBSD Misc
Subject: make build fails for OPENBSD_4_4 on i386
=== libreadline
mkdep
.
Tomas Bodzar pisze:
Beta and build?What a nice type of Sci-Fi ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: OpenBSD Misc
Subject: make build fails for OPENBSD_4_4 on i386
=== libreadline
no there is not. 4.4 is not released. everything you see now is your
imagination ;)
* Khalid Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 13:39]:
Oh yes there is
On 8 Aug 2008, at 12:28, Ted Unangst wrote:
There is no 4.4.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is OPENBSD_4_4_BASE and OPENBSD_4_4
i the CVS repositiory.
True.
So it should be what would be on the CD.
False.
Until the cd-rom are actually created and the release is announced, tags are
a moving target, and are needed for release engineering.
So
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:28:03AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
There is no 4.4.
There is no spoon either.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Cookbooked the procedure from openbsd.org/faq/upgrade42.html.
'rm -Rf' for /usr/src/* /usr/obj/*
Downloaded all .tgz files from the 4.2/amd64 folder on ftp.openbsd.org
Ran the 'tar -C / -xzphf' command on everything except etc42.tgz as directed.
Installed the bsd.mp kernel. Updated
Dear All,
I'm trying to make build OpenBSD 4.2 from -release to -stable. This is what
I'm getting:
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/interps.h:1: error: stray '\236' in program
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/interps.h:1: error: syntax error before Z
Have a look at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/interps.h to see if
it looks all right. Update your source tree if not. If that doesn't
work, suspect a faulty disk.
Regards,
Andreas
Its a brand new IBM server with RAID 1 on 160GB maxtor sata do I doubt ;)
Anyway thanks and will try to
Hi,
I've been trying to recompile the system from source with no success.
I'd previously upgraded this machine from stock 4.1 to 4.1-stable
shortly after installing a few months ago, but I've fallen behind with
patching. It fails every time at the same spot, with the stock 4.1
source tree and
Looks like I solved my own problem. I must have had something set in my
profile that broke this. I logged into root directly and the build
worked. Thanks anyway.
-Claudio
2005/9/27, Tobias Weingartner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday, September 27, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=F6rg_Horchler?= wrote:
I installed OpenBSD 3.7 via cd37.iso and HTTP. Now I want to build a new
release. I checked out the source code via 'cvs co -P -rOPENBSD_3_7
src'. Then I did what is
]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:10 AM
To: Tobias Weingartner
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: make build fails
2005/9/27, Tobias Weingartner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday, September 27, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=F6rg_Horchler?= wrote:
I installed OpenBSD 3.7 via cd37.iso and HTTP. Now
Hi all,
I installed OpenBSD 3.7 via cd37.iso and HTTP. Now I want to build a new
release. I checked out the source code via 'cvs co -P -rOPENBSD_3_7
src'. Then I did what is written in 'man release'. (Build a new kernel
etc.) But when I do a 'make build' it fails with
===
On Tuesday, September 27, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=F6rg_Horchler?= wrote:
I installed OpenBSD 3.7 via cd37.iso and HTTP. Now I want to build a new
release. I checked out the source code via 'cvs co -P -rOPENBSD_3_7
src'. Then I did what is written in 'man release'. (Build a new kernel
etc.) But
Is there any particular reason why you do all these steps:
# export DESTDIR=/
# export CFLAGS='-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -march=athlon-xp -mmmx
-msse -m3dnow
-mfpmath=sse'
# export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
# cd etc
# make distrib-dirs
...
# cd ..
When the only thing you should need to
--On 31 August 2005 09:29 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
# export CFLAGS='-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -march=athlon-xp -mmmx
-msse -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse'
Don't do this with OpenBSD, it's not recommended or supported.
# export CFLAGS='-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -march=athlon-xp -mmmx
-msse -m3dnow
-mfpmath=sse'
So please tell us, where in FAQ it says to use those CFLAGS? Or any compiler
flags at all?
I tried turning these off completely, of course. To no avail, however.
(Actually, I only added the
My salutations to all,
I'm a new user of OpenBSD, so I made sure to strictly stick to
official instructions. I installed 3.7-release on my Athlon box (dmesg
attached below - pretty typical gear), fetched the -stable branch
# cd /usr
# export [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs
# cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout
Is there any particular reason why you do all these steps:
# export DESTDIR=/
# export CFLAGS='-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -march=athlon-xp -mmmx
-msse -m3dnow
-mfpmath=sse'
# export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
# cd etc
# make distrib-dirs
...
# cd ..
When the only thing you should need to do is:
# make
39 matches
Mail list logo
