Does this mean that the performance of a local NFS mount is actually better
than that of mount_nullfs?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> The question is if implementations still sucks as before years
>
> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20050527155028
>
> On Sat,
It means mount_nullfs doesn't exist anymore (it's in the attic) and a
local NFS mount works. I said nothing about performance. I haven't
tested that and don't really care.
Back when nullfs existed, it had serious problems (mtime not updating,
etc). I'm sure that's why it went away.
I can't
The question is if implementations still sucks as before years
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20050527155028
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Dan Brosemer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:59:12AM +0300, Claudiu Prun
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:59:12AM +0300, Claudiu Pruna wrote:
> | Hi list,
> |
> | I was wondering, in OpenBSD is there an equivalent to FreeBSD's
> | mount_nullfs or to Linux's mount -o bind ?
>
> Sure; it's in the attic .
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:59:12AM +0300, Claudiu Pruna wrote:
| Hi list,
|
| I was wondering, in OpenBSD is there an equivalent to FreeBSD's
| mount_nullfs or to Linux's mount -o bind ?
Sure; it's in the attic .. don't wake the spiders!
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/
Hi list,
I was wondering, in OpenBSD is there an equivalent to FreeBSD's
mount_nullfs or to Linux's mount -o bind ?
--
Claudiu Pruna
6 matches
Mail list logo