On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 10/21/06, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
40tg340503n5 pf/iptables (load some other rules or whatever)
So this is like an insecure version of SSH?
If you configure it to behave like that, probably.
But if you configure it to open a
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: On 10/21/06, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: hi,
:
: I wrote a new tool I call OpenPortd for my linux distribution
: but since I my linux distribution is still under development
: and I want to release the
On 10/22/06, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You normaly have different open ports
pf(4) makes this a minor issue. No offense, but what you have there (in the
example specifically) is no better than a limited (if you consider ability
to reboot or kill ssh limited) version of
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 03:55:39AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
On 10/22/06, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You normaly have different open ports
pf(4) makes this a minor issue. No offense, but what you have there (in the
example specifically) is no better than a limited
El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: So this is like an insecure version of SSH?
it has nothing todo with SSH. And of course it isn't very secure
BUT it adds security where normaly no
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:18 +0200 Inigo T. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis:
: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:
: :
: : So this is like an insecure version of SSH?
:
: it has nothing
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 04:41:17PM +0200, Steffen Wendzel wrote:
this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
past. Imagin that your service X is vulnerable (only since a few h
by a zero day exploit or so) and someone tries to exploit it at 2:00 in
the morning.
but
Hi,
On Oct 22, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Steffen Wendzel wrote:
this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
past. Imagin that your service X is vulnerable (only since a few h
by a zero day exploit or so) and someone tries to exploit it at
2:00 in
the morning.
but if you run
On 22/10/06, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:18 +0200 Inigo T. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis:
: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:
: :
: : So this is
Steffen Wendzel wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:18 +0200 Inigo T. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
: If you have a security problem with a service, the only more secure
: action is to fix it, don't to open it eventually.
:
this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
It is like a port knocking service but a little bit different:
Normaly a port knocking service uses TCP/UDP, but openportd
uses ICMP echo response packets because they are not so easy
to send like echo requests or TCP/UDP port tests (kiddies could
simply use ping or nmap for this job).
On Sunday 22 October 2006 22:41, you wrote:
this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
past. Imagin that your service X is vulnerable (only since a few h
by a zero day exploit or so) and someone tries to exploit it at 2:00 in
the morning.
Good thing there cant be any
hi,
I wrote a new tool I call OpenPortd for my linux distribution
but since I my linux distribution is still under development
and I want to release the tool, I wrote an OpenBSD version
too, you maybe like it.
It is like a port knocking service but a little bit different:
Normaly a port
On 10/21/06, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I wrote a new tool I call OpenPortd for my linux distribution
but since I my linux distribution is still under development
and I want to release the tool, I wrote an OpenBSD version
too, you maybe like it.
[...]
You can define keys and
14 matches
Mail list logo
