To put things in perspective, the dpb framework is now about two years old.
It was a bit quirky and experimental until 4.9.
The addition of /usr/ports/infrastructure/man to man.conf happened a little
before 5.0.
So, people wanting to build packages *for current* should have no problem
accessing
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:25:58 +0100, ropers wrote:
If the ports tree is in the usual place
If being the operative word; to quote from undeadly, emphasis added:
This thread is about building -current packages from the ports tree, so I think
it's a reasonable assumption.
then yes 'man dpb'
Hi,
ropers wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM +0200:
On 2011-09-23, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
$ mandoc -Tascii /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/dpb3.1 | less
mandoc -Tascii /usr/ports/infrastructure/man/man1/dpb.1 | less
As you keep citing that line from the outdated undeadly
On 2011-09-23, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
dpb is not in base, there are no packages, it's not mentioned in the
OpenBSD FAQ or Porter's Handbook, and it's not listed at openports.se.
It can be found via the googles, but for your average OpenBSD user
typing man dpb will do exactly diddly
On 23 September 2011 04:46, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
man dpb
While I appreciate the dubious humour of these questions repeating
near *every friggin release*, I also award you this badge for your
reply:
http://codinghorror.typepad.com/.a/6a0120a85dcdae970b0128776ff992970c-pi
dpb
man dpb
While I appreciate the dubious humour of these questions repeating
near *every friggin release*, I also award you this badge for your
reply:
http://codinghorror.typepad.com/.a/6a0120a85dcdae970b0128776ff992970c-pi
dpb is not in base, there are no packages, it's not mentioned in the
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:25:29PM +0200, ropers wrote:
On 23 September 2011 04:46, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
man dpb
While I appreciate the dubious humour of these questions repeating
near *every friggin release*, I also award you this badge for your
reply:
On 2011-09-23, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 September 2011 04:46, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
man dpb
While I appreciate the dubious humour of these questions repeating
near *every friggin release*, I also award you this badge for your
reply:
On 09/23/2011 11:32 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
man dpb
While I appreciate the dubious humour of these questions repeating
near *every friggin release*, I also award you this badge for your
reply:
http://codinghorror.typepad.com/.a/6a0120a85dcdae970b0128776ff992970c-pi
dpb is not in base, there
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 02:19:04PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
this is not a tool for the masses.
Even if it WERE in base and there were a man page for it, I do not
believe the developers would be interested in having people look at
the FAQ and say, ...cool, I should do this!
Shoot...the
On 21-Sep-11 02:23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
I am seeing this too. What is going on? There are packages for other
platforms and none for others. All the mirrors I have check has
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:53 PM, LeviaComm Networks n...@leviacomm.net wrote:
The only way I see to move forward would be to either downgrade to 4.9 or
compile the damned packages myself.
Which would be faster than complaining.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:53 PM, LeviaComm Networks n...@leviacomm.net
wrote:
On 21-Sep-11 02:23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
I am seeing this too. What is going on? There are
On 09/22/11 20:53, LeviaComm Networks wrote:
On 21-Sep-11 02:23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
I am seeing this too. What is going on? There are packages for other
platforms and none
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Gregory Edigarov
g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
The gremlins stole them.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Gregory Edigarov
g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
The gremlins stole them.
One more reason to hate Gnome.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Gregory Edigarov
g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or
18 matches
Mail list logo
