Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-10-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* (private) HKS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-30 22:34]: Thanks, I overlooked that a default queue was required. With that in mind, then, does this section of pf.conf(5) imply that the queue directive is sticky? pf.conf doesn't say it would be sticky anywhere, and, surprise, it isn't. --

Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-30 Thread uw
Am Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:29:08 -0400 schrieb (private) HKS [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If the following two rules apply to a given packet in the order shown, will the packet be queued? pass in on $int_if from 10.0.0.1 queue tens pass in on $int_if I've not been able to find a clear answer in

Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-30 Thread Uwe Werler
Am Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:53:05 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:29:08 -0400 schrieb (private) HKS [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If the following two rules apply to a given packet in the order shown, will the packet be queued? pass in on $int_if from 10.0.0.1 queue tens

Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-30 Thread (private) HKS
imho normally this packet wouldn't be queued because the last count matches the packet so the last rule applies: This is what I assumed at first, but the stickiness of tags and the (seeming) logic of doing the same with queues made me second-guess myself. on the other hand: During the

Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-30 Thread Rosen Iliev
Why you just not use quick in the first rule? pass in quick on $int_if from 10.0.0.1 queue tens pass in on $int_if Rosen (private) HKS wrote, On 9/29/2008 1:29 PM: If the following two rules apply to a given packet in the order shown, will the packet be queued? pass in on $int_if from

Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-30 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
(private) HKS escreveu: imho normally this packet wouldn't be queued because the last count matches the packet so the last rule applies: This is what I assumed at first, but the stickiness of tags and the (seeming) logic of doing the same with queues made me second-guess myself.

Re: pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-30 Thread (private) HKS
from pf.conf man page: default Packets not matched by another queue are assigned to this one. Exactly one default queue is *required.* Thanks, I overlooked that a default queue was required. With that in mind, then, does this section of pf.conf(5) imply that the queue

pf - queue filter directive sticky?

2008-09-29 Thread (private) HKS
If the following two rules apply to a given packet in the order shown, will the packet be queued? pass in on $int_if from 10.0.0.1 queue tens pass in on $int_if I've not been able to find a clear answer in pf.conf(5) or the online PF documentation. If I overlooked it, please let me know. Thanks