Oh wait I've forgot to specify the interface.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:45 AM, John Tate wrote:
> Well I had the bandwidth the wrong way around for my internet connection.
>
> I've been trying the other changes and now I have problems, I'm pretty
> sure I need to put _out and _in on the end...
Well I had the bandwidth the wrong way around for my internet connection.
I've been trying the other changes and now I have problems, I'm pretty sure
I need to put _out and _in on the end...
# pfctl -nf /etc/pf.conf
/etc/pf.conf:39: exactly one scheduler type per interface allowed
/etc/pf.conf:39:
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2013-04-17, John Tate wrote:
>> Well the ruleset loads, can anyone do a quick check of this in case I've
>> done something stupid. I've never used match rules before. I'm not really
>> sure how to test queueing to see if it works.
>
> see "systat queue"; run it as r
On 2013-04-17, John Tate wrote:
> Well the ruleset loads, can anyone do a quick check of this in case I've
> done something stupid. I've never used match rules before. I'm not really
> sure how to test queueing to see if it works.
see "systat queue"; run it as root.
> #queues
> altq on $ext_if p
Well the ruleset loads, can anyone do a quick check of this in case I've
done something stupid. I've never used match rules before. I'm not really
sure how to test queueing to see if it works.
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.50 2011/04/28 00:19:42 mikeb Exp $
#
# See pf.conf(5) for syntax and exampl
Found it in the manpage pretty quick;y, silly me, apparently is the same.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:16 PM, John Tate wrote:
> I can't find any description of the match rules here:
> http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html
>
> Are they the same syntax as block and pass rules?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17,
I can't find any description of the match rules here:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html
Are they the same syntax as block and pass rules?
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> John Tate writes:
>
> > I think I understand, can someone give me a look at a pf.conf wit
John Tate writes:
> I think I understand, can someone give me a look at a pf.conf with queueing
> and nat rules.
With an existing rule set in place, it's probably easier to do the queue
assignment with a block of match rules. That way at least you don't
affect the pass or block decision.
- P
I think I understand, can someone give me a look at a pf.conf with queueing
and nat rules.
It's hard to experiment because I'm logged in via ssh and would lose my
connection every time I make a change. Unfortunately the machine connected
to the firewall via null modem for a serial console has died
as far as i remember in the man page of pf there are places where u can
usually put the queueing rules so nat rules :)
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:32:52 +1000
> Subject: pf queueing and nat
> From: j...@johntate.org
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
> I am adding queueing to my pf bas
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:32:52 +1000
John Tate wrote:
> I am adding queueing to my pf based nat for my home network. Since
> there isn't a complete example involving nat and queuing I am not
> entirely sure where to put things. I've read the manual and I think I
> put things before the rdr-to rules
I am adding queueing to my pf based nat for my home network. Since there
isn't a complete example involving nat and queuing I am not entirely sure
where to put things. I've read the manual and I think I put things before
the rdr-to rules. I also have a transparent ftp and http proxy. I am not
entir
12 matches
Mail list logo
