Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-12 Thread Ramdas
On 3/10/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/7/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/7/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/03/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Group, I have a server with two lan cards both

Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-09 Thread Ramdas
On 3/7/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/7/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/03/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Group, I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface (fxp1) is patched

Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-07 Thread Ramdas
On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/03/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Group, I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface (fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall Other outside firewall (fxp0) I want that there should be no

Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-07 Thread Ramdas
On 3/7/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/03/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Group, I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface (fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall Other outside

New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-05 Thread Ramdas
Hi Group, I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface (fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall Other outside firewall (fxp0) I want that there should be no greylisting/filtering on fxp1 (I have the related ports opened in the PIX) it should be enabled only for

Re: pf rules question

2005-08-14 Thread stan
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:24:43PM -0400, stan wrote: I've got 2 rules like this: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on $int_if from any to any keep state That I think I should be able to replace with: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on

Re: pf rules question

2005-08-14 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2005-08-14 19:17, stan wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:24:43PM -0400, stan wrote: I've got 2 rules like this: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on $int_if from any to any keep state That I think I should be able to replace with: pass out on $int_if from any to any

Re: pf rules question

2005-08-14 Thread stan
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:13:07PM +0200, Erik Wikstr?m wrote: On 2005-08-14 19:17, stan wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:24:43PM -0400, stan wrote: I've got 2 rules like this: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on $int_if from any to any keep state That I think I

Re: pf rules question

2005-08-14 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2005-08-14 21:41, stan wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:13:07PM +0200, Erik Wikstr?m wrote: On 2005-08-14 19:17, stan wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:24:43PM -0400, stan wrote: I've got 2 rules like this: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on $int_if from any to any

Re: pf rules question

2005-08-14 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2005-08-14 19:17, stan wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:24:43PM -0400, stan wrote: I've got 2 rules like this: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on $int_if from any to any keep state That I think I should be able to replace with: pass out on $int_if from any to any

Re: pf rules question

2005-08-14 Thread stan
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 10:13:33PM +0200, Erik Wikstr?m wrote: On 2005-08-14 19:17, stan wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:24:43PM -0400, stan wrote: I've got 2 rules like this: pass out on $int_if from any to any keep state pass in on $int_if from any to any keep state That I think I