On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Adriaan Misc wrote:
> I interpret it that you need a "pass" before the log ;)
that was unfair.
sorry for the noise :(
--
[-]
mkdir /nonexistent
On 12/10/05, Tamas TEVESZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
, what's the correct syntax
> for logging in a nat(/binat/rdr) rule? "nat on pcn0 from
> 192.168.1.0/24 to any -> (pcn0)" works fine, "nat log on pcn..." gives
> a syntax error).
>
> if the diff below is correct, how can one log nats/rdrs
hi,
diff below removes the `log' keyword from the nat, binat and rdr bnf
descriptions. ok, i can't quite read code as much to actually verify
the validity of this, but i simply couldn't get it to work (it doesn't
seem so hard to insert a `log' between a `nat' and a `pass' in an
otherwise working s
3 matches
Mail list logo
