Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-14 Thread Sunnz
2008/6/14 Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sadly, this varies among languages and file-formats. You just have to know how the one you're working in behaves. So, when in doubt, comment every line that needs to be comment out, should work in almost all cases? -- This e-mail may be

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-14 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/6/14 Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sadly, this varies among languages and file-formats. You just have to know how the one you're working in behaves. So, when in doubt, comment every line that needs to be comment out,

pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Jose Fragoso
Hi, I am running OpenBSD 4.3 STABLE in an i386 machine. The man page for pf.conf says at some point: Any lines beginning with a # are treated as comments and ignored. Now, if a comment line ends with \, should the next line be also treated as comment? I noticed this behaviour and I do not know

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Lars Noodén
Jose Fragoso wrote: Now, if a comment line ends with \, should the next line be also treated as comment? I noticed this behaviour and I do not know whether or not it should work like that. Interesting. Good to know that. In a small rule set it's easy to notice, though. I'm able to

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Lars Noodén
Louis V. Lambrecht wrote: rem the backslash is used as an escape character in shell world. Yes, that's quite familiar and I use it a lot, both for long lines and for escaping special characters (quotes, etc). What is new use to me is that the comment lines can be affected. I simply hadn't

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 04:52:45PM +0300, Lars Noodin wrote: Louis V. Lambrecht wrote: rem the backslash is used as an escape character in shell world. Yes, that's quite familiar and I use it a lot, both for long lines and for escaping special characters (quotes, etc). What is new use to

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Louis V. Lambrecht
Ooops! Lars answered to my mail. Means, I hadn't replied to misc@ but the lazy in me just replied. Louis V. Lambrecht wrote: Lars NoodC)n wrote: Jose Fragoso wrote: Now, if a comment line ends with \, should the next line be also treated as comment? I noticed this behaviour and I do not

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Han Boetes
Darrin Chandler wrote: # This \ Thus \ that \ other Clearly this is the intuitive way that should work, since all other languages I know of parse like this. If you want to disable multiple lines you have to comment them all out. Use a decent editor if you think that is much of a

Re: pf.conf comment lines

2008-06-13 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Now, if a comment line ends with \, should the next line be also treated as comment? I noticed this behaviour and I do not know whether or not it should work like that. Well, because you used \ to end the line, that #