But you wrote that you upgraded ports from release to current. Did you
upgrade your system to current too?
Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
Quoth section 15 of the FAQ: Do NOT check out a -current ports tree
and expect it to
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Ersin Akinci ersin.aki...@gmail.comwrote:
Do the packages in current
normally find themselves in the next release?
Yes.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ersin Akinci ersin.aki...@gmail.com wrote:
But you wrote that you upgraded ports from release to current. Did you
upgrade your system to current too?
Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
Quoth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
By which exact syntax?
It's written in FAQ and in man. Use colon ( : ) for separation of entries.
You found that so no problem ;-) Now you can do rm -rf /usr/ports and
then unpack ports.tar.gz for 4.8 release again
I just wish there was some way to get gnash 0.88 on stable...that was
really the only reason I tried to upgrade. Do the packages in current
normally find themselves in the next
On 2010-11-10, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
By which exact syntax?
pkg_add(1) gives you the syntax, personally I don't see much advantage
to listing more than one mirror there,
Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
By which exact syntax?
THX to all for insight
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2010-11-10, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
By which exact syntax?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:39:35 +0100
Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have specified that I have FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in
/etc/mk.conf.
I found when using fetch_packages I had to use make install rather than
make package. Hardly a big deal, but is that expected?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:42:24PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:39:35 +0100
Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have specified that I have FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in
/etc/mk.conf.
I found when using fetch_packages I had to use make install
Hi,
I recently upgraded my ports tree from 4.8 release to current, but now
it's not detecting any dependency packages in my PKG_PATH. PKG_PATH
is set to the main openbsd.org package site and pkg_add works
perfectly fine. I did notice that I was trying to use ports earlier
tonight with a
read this first http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html
ports don't use PKG_PATH, but AnonCVS for updates/upgrades. Ports are
using PKG_PATH only when you set FETCH_PACKAGES see here
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=portssektion=7
Sorry, I should have specified that I have
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Ersin Akinci ersin.aki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded my ports tree from 4.8 release to current, but now
it's not detecting any dependency packages in my PKG_PATH. B PKG_PATH
is set to the main openbsd.org package site and pkg_add works
perfectly
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ersin Akinci ersin.aki...@gmail.com wrote:
read this first http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html
ports don't use PKG_PATH, but AnonCVS for updates/upgrades. Ports are
using PKG_PATH only when you set FETCH_PACKAGES see here
14 matches
Mail list logo
