On 2013-06-01, Lars Nooden lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any big reasons not to choose ral(4) over ath(4) for a host
ap? I've been trying out three wireless cards on -current as host access
points. So far it seems that ral(4) works better, but is quite weak on
the overall range
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:16:37AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
If you're buying something new, athn is usually the best choice, it is
available in minipci as well as minipcie.
There are several newish athn which we don't support yet.
Are there any big reasons not to choose ral(4) over ath(4) for a host
ap? I've been trying out three wireless cards on -current as host access
points. So far it seems that ral(4) works better, but is quite weak on
the overall range in mode 11g as compared to 11a.
One message earlier
3 matches
Mail list logo
