Re: scponly vs. vsftpd

2005-10-18 Thread ed
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:32:24 +0100 Gaby vanhegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 16 Oct 2005, at 15:47, Wijnand Wiersma wrote: I thought scponly has chroot functionality builtin. Yes it does, and you can't link outside of that chroot. Also, you have to setup the chroot to have all the files

Re: scponly vs. vsftpd

2005-10-16 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:32:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am currently working with one of our file servers. Users need access to the server from where they live and so far I have been using sshd with scponly. I have used scponly because I don't want them to have a shell.

Re: scponly vs. vsftpd

2005-10-16 Thread Wijnand Wiersma
2005/10/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1. Continue using scponly but with chroot and then linking the directories inside their home directories. I thought scponly has chroot functionality builtin.

Re: scponly vs. vsftpd

2005-10-16 Thread Michael Erdely
On 10/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Using vsftpd which support ssl both on login and on the data transfer (prefered), and then using the buildin support for jailing users. Then linking the directories inside their home directories. I've successfully used

Missing feature in scp/sftp? (Was Re: scponly vs. vsftpd)

2005-10-16 Thread Dave Anderson
** Reply to message from Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:34:21 +0200 That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. OpenSSH is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* featureful for what you're doing. There _is_ one useful-to-me

Re: scponly vs. vsftpd

2005-10-16 Thread Gaby vanhegan
On 16 Oct 2005, at 15:47, Wijnand Wiersma wrote: 2 1. Continue using scponly but with chroot and then linking the directories inside their home directories. I thought scponly has chroot functionality builtin. Yes it does, and you can't link outside of that chroot. Also, you have to

Re: Missing feature in scp/sftp? (Was Re: scponly vs. vsftpd)

2005-10-16 Thread Gaby vanhegan
On 16 Oct 2005, at 17:13, Dave Anderson wrote: That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. OpenSSH is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* featureful for what you're doing. There _is_ one useful-to-me feature of FTP that I can't find in SCP or

Re: Missing feature in scp/sftp? (Was Re: scponly vs. vsftpd)

2005-10-16 Thread Dave Anderson
** Reply to message from Gaby vanhegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:34:54 +0100 On 16 Oct 2005, at 17:13, Dave Anderson wrote: That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. OpenSSH is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* featureful for

scponly vs. vsftpd

2005-10-15 Thread ccc51536
Hi, I am currently working with one of our file servers. Users need access to the server from where they live and so far I have been using sshd with scponly. I have used scponly because I don't want them to have a shell. The problem with the setup is that not al the users may access all the