On Jul 30 22:06:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-07-30, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
is 128M, that's why I use xserv45.tgz and not base45.tgz;
and it should have been tar xzpf I guess - does it make
a difference? And it shloud be done in single user - but
the machine is almost idle,
On 2009-08-03, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 30 22:06:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-07-30, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
is 128M, that's why I use xserv45.tgz and not base45.tgz;
and it should have been tar xzpf I guess - does it make
a difference? And it shloud be done in
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:32:32AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-08-03, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 30 22:06:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-07-30, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
is 128M, that's why I use xserv45.tgz and not base45.tgz;
and it should have been tar
it was even async, which makes me curious about the install slowness.
Could the card or the exact mount options be the cause of that?
Well, you already noticed the main difference; one is async, the
other uses softdep. That should suggest a simple test you can make;
untarring on a running
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:25:23AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I suppose you use an CF-card with about x133 speed. I had the same problem.
After using a card with at least x233 speed I didn't have that problem when
untaring anymore.
The speed rating by itself isn't very useful. The
On Jul 30 14:29:06, Tobias Walkowiak wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:25:23AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I suppose you use an CF-card with about x133 speed. I had the same
problem.
After using a card with at least x233 speed I didn't have that problem
when
untaring
On Jul 30 11:25:23, Stuart Henderson wrote:
it was even async, which makes me curious about the install slowness.
Could the card or the exact mount options be the cause of that?
Well, you already noticed the main difference; one is async, the
other uses softdep. That should suggest a
On 2009-07-30, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
is 128M, that's why I use xserv45.tgz and not base45.tgz;
and it should have been tar xzpf I guess - does it make
a difference? And it shloud be done in single user - but
the machine is almost idle, really.)
xserv has a small number of large
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:14:18PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
When installing 4.5 on an ALIX (see dmesg below) the
ALIX is a good choice!
phase of actually untar'ing the tgz sets was very slow:
sets became -stalled- even if untared from local disk (pre-downloaded).
I suppose you use an CF-card
9 matches
Mail list logo
