@Ted :
Good to know, thanks for details.
@Theo :
I am not the OP of the torrent topic. The topic was from thuban. I have no need
for a torrent but had only this ideas / doubts about it.
Am 27. April 2017 18:43:29 MESZ schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>> Christoph R. Murauer
> Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> > True but let me be a littlebit paranoid. Would it not be possible to create
> > a new .fs / .iso with new keys in /etc/signify/* and new SHA256 / .sig
> > files to place bad content and distribute it using a torrent ? I came
> > across this idea as I readed
Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> True but let me be a littlebit paranoid. Would it not be possible to create a
> new .fs / .iso with new keys in /etc/signify/* and new SHA256 / .sig files to
> place bad content and distribute it using a torrent ? I came across this idea
> as I readed long time ago
True but let me be a littlebit paranoid. Would it not be possible to create a
new .fs / .iso with new keys in /etc/signify/* and new SHA256 / .sig files to
place bad content and distribute it using a torrent ? I came across this idea
as I readed long time ago some ideas how goverments could
> yes, but unlike those distros the openbsd installers aren't measured in
> gigabytes.
>
Of course, the point doesn't apply to miniroot* but to installxx.xx.
It doesn't remove the problem of long download for some and servers
bandwidth possible issue.
Using miniroot* still requires to download
Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> Let's say, you provide a torrent for the .fs and .iso files. Who trusts a
> SHA256.sig file from an unofficial torrent ?
The whole point of signing the SHA256 is you don't have to trust the person
who gives it to you.
Let's say, you provide a torrent for the .fs and .iso files. Who trusts a
SHA256.sig file from an unofficial torrent ?
If you look at the errata page, you see, that you have to patch the system to
keep it up to date and, there are no official updates of the .fs and .iso files
after a patch.
- On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Nicolas Schmidt
schmi...@mathematik.hu-berlin.de wrote:
> Many distros sport torrents: NetBSD, Debian, and Ubuntu to name some.
> Rationale
> behind this is simple: torrents download with ridiculous speed if they are
> popular enough.
To be fair, popular
yes, but unlike those distros the openbsd installers aren't measured in
gigabytes.
The site mentioned by OP (http://openbsd.somedomain.net) is up to date,
and has the torrents mentioned.
it just seems, nobody cares.
On 2017 Apr 27 (Thu) at 15:07:38 +0200 (+0200), Nicolas Schmidt wrote:
:Many
ISO is burned down to the CD you buy.
To install you really just need to PXE.
> 27 apr. 2017 kl. 13:55 skrev Thuban :
>
> Hello,
> I was wondering if there is any particular reason explaining why there
> is no torrent file to retrieve OpenBSD *.fs and *.iso.
>
> I've
Many distros sport torrents: NetBSD, Debian, and Ubuntu to name some. Rationale
behind this is simple: torrents download with ridiculous speed if they are
popular enough.
Best,
Nicolas
> Am 27.04.2017 um 14:36 schrieb Markus Rosjat :
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's kinda pointless
Hi,
I think it's kinda pointless to have a torrent for this. You got enough
good mirrors to download from anyway. And nowadays it's not a biggy to
download a iso or so of somewhat 200mb.
and yes I'm the proud owner of some awesome puffy shirts too (if someone
is concerned about the download
On April 27, 2017 7:55:42 AM EDT, Thuban wrote:
>Hello,
>I was wondering if there is any particular reason explaining why there
>is no torrent file to retrieve OpenBSD *.fs and *.iso.
>
>I've been looking on the list and only found this site that doesn't
>seems up to date
Hello,
I was wondering if there is any particular reason explaining why there
is no torrent file to retrieve OpenBSD *.fs and *.iso.
I've been looking on the list and only found this site that doesn't
seems up to date [1].
If the reason is a lack of human ressources, I think I can handle it.
14 matches
Mail list logo