2006/8/15, Will Hoskins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The maintainer's page was abandoned before his driver even made it into
the kernel. Since then his forum has been filled up with people trying
to figure out why it won't work and, more recently, spam.
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/
Craig Skinner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:48:55PM -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote:
PPPoA is in some ways, preferable, since you don't have the MTU
issue of PPPoE.
Much better.
It is helpful to include such details ;)
I didn't think it was important, since I wasn't asking for help. I'm
I was overjoyed when this chipset was supported in 3.8. At last, I
thought, consumer level DSL equipment which will show up as an interface
instead of some dodgy ppp tun0 nonsense.
Imagine my disappointment then when it failed miserably to work. It
never has, I've tried no end of variations
Will Hoskins wrote:
I was overjoyed when this chipset was supported in 3.8. At last, I
thought, consumer level DSL equipment which will show up as an interface
instead of some dodgy ppp tun0 nonsense.
So then, my obsd sweethearts, do you ever drop support for vapourware
drivers or will this
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Will Hoskins wrote:
I was overjoyed when this chipset was supported in 3.8. At last, I
thought, consumer level DSL equipment which will show up as an
interface instead of some dodgy ppp tun0 nonsense.
So then, my obsd sweethearts, do you ever drop support for
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that
it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and
one less piece hanging off the power strip, but canacar@ and crew have
done an incredible job on it, to the point where even my old
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that
it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and
one less piece hanging off the power strip, but canacar@ and crew have
done an incredible job on it,
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:48:55 -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Why not just a plain old DSL/10BaseT bridge and pppoe(8)? I agree that
it'd be great to have hardware plugged comfortably inside the system and
one less piece hanging off the power strip,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:48:55PM -0400, Chris Zakelj wrote:
PPPoA is in some ways, preferable, since you don't have the MTU
issue of PPPoE.
Much better.
It is helpful to include such details ;) At the office where I worked
roughly three years ago, we had a setup where the external
9 matches
Mail list logo
