Re: updating packages with ports binaries

2010-04-17 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:44:50 +0200 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:26:41PM -0400, Arnaud Bergeron wrote: Normally, as long as you do not use -F something as an option to pkg_add, everything you do with it is safe. (caveat: sometimes there are major upgrades,

Re: updating packages with ports binaries

2010-04-11 Thread Arnaud Bergeron
Disclaimer: I am not a pkg tools expert, so if somebody comes along and correct me (especially espie@) then they are right. 2010/4/10 Andreas Gerdd kryptos...@gmail.com: I follow stable tree, OPENBSD_4_6 branch. I'd like to update some of my packages. As an example, # pkg_add -unvi tiff

Re: updating packages with ports binaries

2010-04-11 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:26:41PM -0400, Arnaud Bergeron wrote: Normally, as long as you do not use -F something as an option to pkg_add, everything you do with it is safe. (caveat: sometimes there are major upgrades, like for postgresql that require extra actions, but those are when you

updating packages with ports binaries

2010-04-10 Thread Andreas Gerdd
I follow stable tree, OPENBSD_4_6 branch. I'd like to update some of my packages. As an example, # pkg_add -unvi tiff gives the following message; 'No need to update tiff-3.8.2p4' but my /usr/ports (OPENBSD_4_6) has tiff-3.8.2p5. After running 'make package' inside ./graphics/tiff, i got the