On 18/05/2016 06:11, Roderick wrote:
It seems, the troll was successfull by generating a discussion. :)
You cannot compare sam with ed. The first is not a line editor.
Methinks that Joel was referring to the ed joke:
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html
jog
Plan9 has a lot of
- Original Message -
> In all seriousness, Richard Stallman incurred a repetitive stress injury
> from using emacs commands. Holding down Ctrl or Alt can be bad for your
> health. That's why I generally use vi even though there are things I don't
> like and wish there were a better choice
It seems, the troll was successfull by generating a discussion. :)
You cannot compare sam with ed. The first is not a line editor.
Plan9 has a lot of conceptual improvements over Unix/BSD.
See: http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/sam/
Rodrigo.
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Joel WirÄmu
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 19:33 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > acme(1)
>
> Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
>
emacs nXML mode
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/nxml-mode.html
+
Practical Ontologies for Information Professionals, David Stuart
ed()
QED.
On 18 May 2016 at 14:33, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > acme(1)
>
> Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
> In all seriousness, Richard Stallman incurred a repetitive stress injury
> from using emacs commands. Holding down Ctrl or Alt can be bad for your
> health. That's why I generally use vi even though there are things I don't
> like and wish there were a better choice by default.
acme(1)
> acme(1)
Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
In all seriousness, Richard Stallman incurred a repetitive stress injury
from using emacs commands. Holding down Ctrl or Alt can be bad for your
health. That's why I generally use vi even though there are things I don't
like and wish there were a better choice by default.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:25:45AM +0100, trebol55...@yandex.ru wrote:
> mg(1)
>
> […] It is compatible with emacs because
> there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or
> vi(1).
>
> Where is the troll, where is the silly troll?
>
Given enough time, a
You are all wrong.
The correct answer is pico.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, wrote:
> // mg(1)
> //
> // [â¦] It is compatible with emacs because
> // there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs
> or
> // vi(1).
> //
> // Where is the
// mg(1)
//
// […] It is compatible with emacs because
// there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or
// vi(1).
//
// Where is the troll, where is the silly troll?
The sarcasm doesn't work good in an email, so:
- Use the editor you like, editors war is the
// mg(1)
//
// […] It is compatible with emacs because
// there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or
// vi(1).
//
// Where is the troll, where is the silly troll?
Well, the sarcasm doesn't work good in a mail, so:
- Use the editor that you like, editors
mg(1)
[…] It is compatible with emacs because
there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or
vi(1).
Where is the troll, where is the silly troll?
13 matches
Mail list logo