On 4/25/07, poncenby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm obviously missing something here.
could you explain why it is a bad idea to have two files, the key and salt,
which
would be used to initially mount the regular file, then securely deleted from
the
host and only re-introduced to the host when
i'm obviously missing something here.
could you explain why it is a bad idea to have two files, the key and salt,
which
would be used to initially mount the regular file, then securely deleted from
the
host and only re-introduced to the host when decryption/remounting is required.
and also, for u
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:47:00PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> List,
>
> Are there plans to change vnconfig so it will accept a file for the key when
> -K
> is specified?
> I notice there was a patch put up to misc in 2004, does anyone know if there
> is a
> patch for 4.0?
vnconfig in -current, at
List,
Are there plans to change vnconfig so it will accept a file for the key when -K
is specified?
I notice there was a patch put up to misc in 2004, does anyone know if there is
a
patch for 4.0?
Cheers
poncenby
4 matches
Mail list logo
