Re: difference between newfs and newfs -m 1 on a 250G hd?

2005-06-26 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, bofh wrote: I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable. fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a newfs /dev/wd3a, the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it) and mounts without problems. Any idea why?

System date reset to 1969 while attempting to run chrooted linux binary

2005-06-26 Thread Kareem Dana
Hello, I am using OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC on an i386 and installed the redhat_base-8.0p4.tgz for linux compatibilty and was fooling around with getting linux binaries to work within a chroot when I noticed that my system clock had been reset to 1969. The only reference to that happening that I found

no network on OBSD 3.7 snap with Lucent Orinoco (wi0)

2005-06-26 Thread Andreas Bihlmaier
Hello misc@, I finally decided to send a mail here because I'm despairing with my wireless network since I upgraded to the latest snapshot. I simply try to connect to a 802.11b network using a Lucent Orinoco. For testing purposes I even got over my paranoia for a couple of minutes and tested

wireless usb

2005-06-26 Thread Qv6
Folks, I'm trying to set up a wireless system and looking to use a wireless usb adapter. If anyone has successfully configured a wirelesss usb on obsd, please email me the make and model. TIA, Qv6

Re: perl -MCPAN checksum mismatch on anything

2005-06-26 Thread Chet Langin
Same problem. I too have this same problem. Fresh install...no custom anything...just trying to add modules to perl, and anything tried fails 100% no matter which source I use (even perl.org). Whats going on? - anyone have any further insight on this? -- Chet Langin

PF-Question

2005-06-26 Thread sebastian . rother
I've a question related to PF. SpamD provides a trap. If somebody sends e-Mail to a e.g. special mailadress this host will be added to a list. Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf? E.g. more skilled badguys don't use `nmap -sS target`. Such guys will limit their scans to just a few

Re: wireless usb

2005-06-26 Thread Russell J. Wood
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote: Folks, I'm trying to set up a wireless system and looking to use a wireless usb adapter. If anyone has successfully configured a wirelesss usb on obsd, please email me the make and model. There are plenty of Wireless USB ethernet

Re: perl -MCPAN checksum mismatch on anything

2005-06-26 Thread Todd C. Miller
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] so spake WR (gen2): Checksum mismatch for distribution file. Please investigate. I'd recommend removing /root/.cpan/sources/authors/id/R/RE/REATMON/Net-Jabber-2.0.tar.gz. Its MD5 checksum is incorrect. Maybe you have configured your 'urllist' with a bad

Re: PF-Question

2005-06-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 26 June 2005 15:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf? E.g. more skilled badguys don't use `nmap -sS target`. Such guys will limit their scans to just a few ports (3-6). Since this type of scan typically won't complete a 3-way handshake,

Re: wireless usb

2005-06-26 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote: Folks, I'm trying to set up a wireless system and looking to use a wireless usb adapter. If anyone has successfully configured a wirelesss usb on obsd, please email me the make and model.

Re: PF-Question

2005-06-26 Thread sbr
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:27:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've a question related to PF. SpamD provides a trap. If somebody sends e-Mail to a e.g. special mailadress this host will be added to a list. Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf? E.g. more skilled badguys

Re: PF-Question

2005-06-26 Thread sebastian . rother
--On 26 June 2005 15:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf? E.g. more skilled badguys don't use `nmap -sS target`. Such guys will limit their scans to just a few ports (3-6). Since this type of scan typically won't complete a 3-way handshake,

nx server on OpenBSD

2005-06-26 Thread Bret Rilling
By Googling off and on for the last 6mo it seems there is no port/package for NoMachine/Freenx remote desktop on OpenBSD??? I only found one a post by Philipp over on the dev forum at NoMachine and a FreeBSD port by Dewey on www.freshports.com. Is anyone aware of efforts to in this direction?

Re: System date reset to 1969 while attempting to run chrooted linux binary

2005-06-26 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Kareem Dana wrote: I am using OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC on an i386 and installed the redhat_base-8.0p4.tgz for linux compatibilty and was fooling around with getting linux binaries to work within a chroot when I noticed that my system clock had been reset to 1969. The only

Re: openbsd as basis for something better?

2005-06-26 Thread Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey! i'm curious about all these new operating systems, that all claim to be the next generation. there are many out there. plan9, hurd, eros, movitz. and many vaporware projects as well, such as lainos. but they all want to reinvent the wheel. i think this

Re: difference between newfs and newfs -m 1 on a 250G hd?

2005-06-26 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Ted Unangst wrote: On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, bofh wrote: I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable. fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a newfs /dev/wd3a, the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it)

human-time limit.

2005-06-26 Thread David Pluoe
Are you gonna add anytime soon a resource limit for human-time, so it would be easier to keep dead locks and any other same kind of type processes in control? httpd would really benefit from it when providing service for many newbie users out there. Regards, David

Re: kernel pppoe addon

2005-06-26 Thread Simon Dassow
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 11:34:51PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote: Please forgive me if I missed something about the kernel pppoe but my initial tests with the program were positive. However I noticed that when my ISP disconnects the connection, it reauthenticates with a new IP and the default

Re: difference between newfs and newfs -m 1 on a 250G hd?

2005-06-26 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, eric wrote: you changed a default and found a bug. less than 1% of users ever use -m. there's really no good reason to use -m 1, and several reasons not to (not least of which is it apparently doesn't work). leave it alone and use the default; you will be

openntpd and access

2005-06-26 Thread J.D. Bronson
I am using obsd 3.7 with a update to 3.7-stable. I am using the stock ntpd.. I have several Cisco boxes that need to sync off of this obsd box for NTP and they are seeing connection refused. I enabled time (udp/tcp) in inetd.conf and gave it a HUP. Still cisco sees 'connection refused'. So

Re: openntpd and access

2005-06-26 Thread Jason Crawford
By default, OpenNTPd doesn't listen on any port, it just acts as a client for the local machine only. In order for it to serve time to other machines on your network, you must uncomment the listen * line in /etc/ntpd.conf, then send a SIGHUP to ntpd, or restart it, in order for it to listen on

Re: openntpd and access

2005-06-26 Thread Jason Crawford
What about trying listen on *? And are you mabye running pf with block-policy return? There are a bunch of reasons why connections might be reset. If listen on * still doesn't work, maybe think about filing some sort of bug report, or posting more to the list to get the problem solved, because

Re: openntpd and access

2005-06-26 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 04:40 PM 6/26/2005, Jason Crawford wrote: What about trying listen on *? And are you mabye running pf with block-policy return? There are a bunch of reasons why connections might be reset. If listen on * still doesn't work, maybe think about filing some sort of bug report, or posting more to

Re: wireless usb

2005-06-26 Thread Qv6
On Sunday 26 June 2005 09:48 am, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=uralapropos=0sektion=4 manpath=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386format=html I am familiar with that link and I bought one, a Belkin F5D7050 which is

Re: wireless usb

2005-06-26 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 05:26:21PM -0500, Qv6 wrote: On Sunday 26 June 2005 09:48 am, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=uralapropos=0sektion=4 manpath=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386format=html I am

SH programming

2005-06-26 Thread Peter Bako
Ok, so this is not really an OpenBSD question but I am doing this on an OpenBSD system and I am about to lose my mind... I have done some basic shell scripting before but I've not had to deal with actual integer math before and now it is killing me. The script takes a parameter in (year number)

Re: SH programming

2005-06-26 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Peter Bako wrote: #!/bin/sh month=$1 day=$2 year=$3 dayscount=$(expr ($year - 1900) * 365) echo $dayscount exit This will generate a syntax error: `$year' unexpected error. I have tried all sorts of variations and I am not getting it!!! HELP!!! man sh says

Re: advice

2005-06-26 Thread sebastian . rother
Hello, I've installed OpenBSD recently and wanted to install few extra applications. Due to that I have some questions. First of all i will introduce what i would like to accomplish so maybe it would be easier to answer. My goal is to install www, ftp and ssh server based on stable software.

Re: SH programming

2005-06-26 Thread Peter Bako
Hum, I get a syntax error: '*' unexpected -Original Message- From: Michael Erdely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:20 PM To: Peter Bako Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: SH programming On 6/26/05, Peter Bako [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dayscount=$(expr ($year -

Re: difference between newfs and newfs -m 1 on a 250G hd?

2005-06-26 Thread bofh
On 6/26/05, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Ted Unangst wrote: you changed a default and found a bug. less than 1% of users ever use -m. there's really no good reason to use -m 1, and several reasons not to (not least of which is it apparently doesn't work).

Re: SH programming

2005-06-26 Thread Stephen Marley
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:32:36PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Peter Bako wrote: #!/bin/sh month=$1 day=$2 year=$3 dayscount=$(expr ($year - 1900) * 365) echo $dayscount exit This will generate a syntax error: `$year' unexpected error. I have tried

Re: SH programming

2005-06-26 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:51:07 -0700, Peter Bako wrote: Hum, I get a syntax error: '*' unexpected IJWFM using sh or ksh on 3.7 i386 entering year and the calc line at the prompt and echoing $daycount at the prompt. -Original Message- From: Michael Erdely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: