out of swap error?

2006-09-05 Thread Jeff Bromberger
Hello, I've got a freshly installed amd64 (dual core opteron) system running the latest snapshot (bsd.mp kernel). I have 1GB of ram and a 1GB swap partition. The machine has next to nothing on it at this point, not even X. The only packages I have installed are postfix, fetchmail and

Re: MacPro (Quad Intel Xeon 5150 dual-core) support?

2006-09-05 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Anon Y. Mous wrote: Is support planned for Woodcrest? MacPro Quad Xeon tower? Sure, if you send us a machine; these beasts generally do not just appear in my (or any other developers') house. -Otto

Re: Unable to build jdk-1.4.2p7 on OpenBSD/i386 3.9-GENERIC

2006-09-05 Thread Craig Skinner
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:53:56AM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote: Hi misc, I can't build jdk-1.4.2p7 on my openbsd box (3.9 running in MS-VirtualServer)... Can somebody help ? jdk-1.3.1p6, jre-1.3.1p6 and jdk-linux-1.3.1_16 succeeded. Here's the logs : Target Build Versions:

netstat, socket, pid

2006-09-05 Thread Stephan A. Rickauer
What is the most elegant way to find out which pid/program belongs to which socket? netstat(1) and archive didn't help me in that case. Thanks, -- Stephan A. Rickauer --- Institut f|r Neuroinformatik Tel: +41 44 635 30 50

Re: netstat, socket, pid

2006-09-05 Thread Han Boetes
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote: What is the most elegant way to find out which pid/program belongs to which socket? netstat(1) and archive didn't help me in that case. fstat # Han

tcp flags with tcpdum and pflog0

2006-09-05 Thread Jörg Streckfuß
Hi list, I'm trying to find out if it is possible to see the tcp flags in a tcpdump output of the device pflog0 (blocked packets). When i take a physikal interface like em0 the following command shows me the tcp flags tcpdump -nevvvi em0 tcp But the same with pflog0 only shows me this further

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Gilbert Fernandes wrote: I have a dream. A dream of unification. Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another. But when you tell yourself that it cannot be

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:50:00PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a stupid comment, but ... Linux is one kernel, multiple distributions ... BSD is, what, 4 kernels now? If we

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:14:31PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Miod Vallat wrote: If the vendor is supporting the driver, and working with the community, then one would hope that they would also fix the driver as bug reports come in about it ... That's too many ifs

Re: tcp flags with tcpdum and pflog0

2006-09-05 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:17:13AM +0200, J??rg Streckfu?? wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to find out if it is possible to see the tcp flags in a tcpdump output of the device pflog0 (blocked packets). When i take a physikal interface like em0 the following command shows me the tcp flags

sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Igor Sobrado
Hello! I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern is not getting a workaround for this problem (hopefully, I found one) but understanding if there are hidden issues than can damage files stored in these

Re: ssh problem

2006-09-05 Thread Thordur I. Bjornsson
Leonard Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon 4.Sep'06 at 22:22:30 -0400 I've configured a Soekris running OpenBSD 3.9 pf as a firewall, with a read only CF. I am using the default sshd_config file except to run sshd on port 222. /dev mounted read only ? If so, then thats your proplem.

Question regarding mailserver setup

2006-09-05 Thread Jonas Thambert
Hi, Im using postfix,amavisd,clamav,spamassassin on a OpenBSD 3.9 server. The setup works great. The problem I have is that I would like to use Razor or Pyzor. I tried and installed razor but it doesnt seem to work very well. On another Linux server I have Pyzor and it catches almost all spam I

Re: Question regarding mailserver setup

2006-09-05 Thread Lukasz Sztachanski
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:58:31PM +0200, Jonas Thambert wrote: Hi, Im using postfix,amavisd,clamav,spamassassin on a OpenBSD 3.9 server. The setup works great. The problem I have is that I would like to use Razor or Pyzor. I tried and installed razor but it doesnt seem to work very well.

Re: tcp flags with tcpdum and pflog0

2006-09-05 Thread Jörg Streckfuß
Am Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:34:32 +0200 schrieb Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I believe this means the packet is truncated. I could be wrong, but if this is correct, add -s with an appropriate size [1]. Yeah, that's it. Thanks. Joerg [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type

OpenBSD/i386 4.0 Install CD successfull boot on IBM HS20 BladeCenter !

2006-09-05 Thread Bruno Carnazzi
Hi misc, I've spent some time in trying to install openbsd on some IBM HS20 and I didn't manage with 3.8 and 3.9. While trying with the 4.0-beta CD, I've found a way to boot. As I don't have some erasable HS20 available, I can't install it. If someone can post here a dmesg after installation,

Re: OpenBSD/i386 4.0 Install CD successfull boot on IBM HS20 BladeCenter !

2006-09-05 Thread Bruno Carnazzi
2006/9/5, Bruno Carnazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi misc, I've spent some time in trying to install openbsd on some IBM HS20 and I didn't manage with 3.8 and 3.9. While trying with the 4.0-beta CD, I've found a way to boot. As I don't have some erasable HS20 available, I can't install it. If

Re: sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Jeff Quast
On 9/5/06, Igor Sobrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern [...] Can it be a problem when sharing these drives with non-i386 architectures? Guessing that

Replacing a failed HD in a raidframe array

2006-09-05 Thread Jason Murray
I've had a failed HD in my raid array that I have finally bought a replacement for. It is bigger so it should be large enough. I just want a sanity check that I am doing the right thing. I have read the man pages, but hey it's my data, and even though I've got a backup, it is intimidating

Re: sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread viq
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:13, Igor Sobrado wrote: Hello! I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern is not getting a workaround for this problem (hopefully, I found one) but understanding if

wpi0: could not lock memory

2006-09-05 Thread Tom
Hello I'm trying to make use of the new wpi(4) wireless driver for my Intel 3945ABG wireless card. I'm using the snapshot dated 09/01/06. After booting the machine for the first time I saw wpi0: could not lock memory repeated over and over. I tried installing the firmware (wpi-firmware-1.13.tgz)

Re: sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Igor Sobrado
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Quast writes: On 9/5/06, Igor Sobrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern [...] Can it be a problem when sharing

Re: 5.1 sound card support in OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Paul Irofti
On Monday 04 September 2006 09:13, you wrote: Hi misc, I can't find informations on 5.1 sound card support in OpenBSD. I know OpenBSD sound system relies on SunAudio, but I'm not aware of its capabilities. Best regards, Bruno. The best I could achive with OpenBSD is 4.1 :) I can't

Re: sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread viq
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 19:24, Igor Sobrado wrote: Hi viq! Sorry, I have read your message right now (...I am not subscribed to this mailing list, I was looking at MARC as it seems the most up to date archive, and found your answer.) Thanks a lot for the excellent reference you

Re: sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Igor Sobrado
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], viq writes: On Tuesday 05 September 2006 19:24, Igor Sobrado wrote: Thanks a lot for the excellent reference you provided in your email. Indeed, it is a BSD disklabel related problem not a ffs's one. And it seems a serious one! I was about to just mention

IKE Phase-II fails - GETSPI: Operation not supported

2006-09-05 Thread John Ruff
I'm trying implement a IPSec/VPN tunnel and phase-II of the IKE negotiation is failing with the following errors seen from 'isakmpd - dKL -D A=90': 110340.763012 Default pf_key_v2_get_spi: GETSPI: Operation not supported 110340.763362 Default initiator_send_HASH_SA_NONCE: doi-get_spi failed

Re: NXE bit on amd64 hardware and i386 kernel

2006-09-05 Thread mickey
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote: Hello When I boot 64 bit kernel on amd64 hardware I got NXE bit recognized. When I boot 32 bit kernel on amd64 it doesn't appear. I wonder if it's normal. If it's simply not supported/not done yet are there any plans to

Re: sharing ffs filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Pedro Martelletto
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:24:55PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote: Indeed, it is a BSD disklabel related problem not a ffs's one. It *is* a FFS problem. The superblocks are different. -p.

IKE Phase-II fails - GETSPI: Operation not supported

2006-09-05 Thread John Ruff
***Please ignore previous post. Forgive me for not googling first. Answer: # sysctl net.inet.esp.enable=1 [previous post] I'm trying implement a IPSec/VPN tunnel and phase-II of the IKE negotiation is failing with the following errors seen from 'isakmpd - dKL -D A=90': 110340.763012

ambiguities around burning CD

2006-09-05 Thread Karel Kulhavy
I am trying to write a CD and I have atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: SAMSUNG, CDRW/DVD SN-324S, U303 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable man cdrecord says: Some operating systems or SCSI transport implementations may require to specify a

Re: ambiguities around burning CD

2006-09-05 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Karel Kulhavy wrote: I am trying to write a CD and I have atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: SAMSUNG, CDRW/DVD SN-324S, U303 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable man cdrecord says: Some operating systems or SCSI

UTC vs UCT timezone

2006-09-05 Thread Scott Plumlee
The FAQ seems to reference UTC (at least in section 8), which would translate at Universal Time, Coordinated, from what I understand. Are these two the same?

Some questions related to 4.0

2006-09-05 Thread sebastian . rother
Hello everybody, I`ve some questions related to the upcomming 4.0 Release. I`ve read that SpeedStep was deactivated for SMP. Could somebody explain me why this was done? I`ve read some AMD announcements and they`ll produce (this year maybe even) a 4 Core CPU. And as advantage they`ve pointed

Re: Some questions related to 4.0

2006-09-05 Thread ddp
On 9/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everybody, I`ve some questions related to the upcomming 4.0 Release. I`ve read that SpeedStep was deactivated for SMP. Could somebody explain me why this was done? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=115635621902871

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Marco Peereboom
I don't think that binary only drivers are well enough. Surely better than nothing but ... No fucking way. No support is FAR FAR better than a blob. Yes, really! Don't forget that an open source team sometimes makes api changes that might break a binary only driver. And companies

Re: UTC vs UCT timezone

2006-09-05 Thread Gustavo Rios
I had always had sych questions and had never had an answer. Good question Plumlee. On 9/5/06, Scott Plumlee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The FAQ seems to reference UTC (at least in section 8), which would translate at Universal Time, Coordinated, from what I understand. Are these two the same?

Re: ambiguities around burning CD

2006-09-05 Thread Shane J Pearson
Hi Karel, On 06/09/2006, at 6:13 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote: So the possible values for dev= according to this documentation are so far dev=0,0,0 dev=/dev/cd0a:0,0,0 dev=/dev/cd0c:0,0,0 dev=/dev/rcd0a:0,0,0 I use: cdrecord dev=/dev/rcd0c ^ ^ Which works fine for me.

Re: UTC vs UCT timezone

2006-09-05 Thread Scott Plumlee
Mark Zimmerman wrote: On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:27:42PM -0400, Scott Plumlee wrote: The FAQ seems to reference UTC (at least in section 8), which would translate at Universal Time, Coordinated, from what I understand. Are these two the same? Yes, UTC is Coordinated Universal Time. The

matrox g450 - unabale to play a simple video? :(

2006-09-05 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hello everybody, The Box I`m using for multimedia died so I tried to watch a simple Movie with mplayer. The video is a OGM-File and contains 2 audio streams and 2 Subtitles. The Video Codec is DivX/Xvid and the audio streams are compressed using MP3. When I try to play the movie with mplayer it

Re: matrox g450 - unabale to play a simple video? :(

2006-09-05 Thread Sebastian Rother
Some corrections: The old Version was 3.8 (not 2.8, typo..) And the screen (at X) gets fucked even by pressing page-up/down. :-/ But if I would be able to play a little ~300MB file I would be already happy. :) Kind regards, Sebastian

LANPARTY UT NF590 SLI-M2R/G Compatibility?

2006-09-05 Thread Alejandro
Hi. I saved money for a new pc and i would like buy this motherboard, but i don't know about compatibily. I read www.openbsd.org/amd64.html and i have doubts with the chipset, audio and lan. Audio: - Realtek ALC885 8-channel High Definition Audio CODEC - 6 audio jacks Lan: - NVIDIA(r)

Re: ssh problem

2006-09-05 Thread Leonard Jacobs
Well I wish it were this easy, or perhaps I am still missing something. I added AllowUsers username in the sshd_config file and changed the drive to read/write and here's the results: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mount -o rw /dev/wd0a / [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ssh -p 222 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Blobs

2006-09-05 Thread chefren
On 9/5/06 4:18 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: Allowing blobs is the equivalent of eating fast food; it is convenient now but 10 years from now your ass wont fit through the door. I don't know why but I feel someone has won here, no idea which contest it was or what but this quote will help a

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-05 Thread Stefan Bojilov
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:55:42 +0200, Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:50:00PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a stupid comment, but ... Linux is

pf.conf's example of tables using ports

2006-09-05 Thread Pablo Halamaj
maybe i'm plain stupid or i have a weird install. All you have the following line at pf.conf ,that comes with OpenBSd 3.9,? #table httport { 80, 443 } I have readed the pf.conf 's man page also the FAQ at www.openbsd.org and it says A table is used to hold a group of IPv4 and/or IPv6

Confused about patching X in OBSD 3.9

2006-09-05 Thread First Last
For OBSD 3.9 there is a patch for X, 002_xorg.patch The patch says it should be applied to the X source located at: cd /usr/src/XF4 But everything I've ever read says the X source, XF4.tar.gz should be unpacked and stored in: /usr/ Example of this: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting

Re: Confused about patching X in OBSD 3.9

2006-09-05 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:07:22AM +0800, First Last wrote: For OBSD 3.9 there is a patch for X, 002_xorg.patch The patch says it should be applied to the X source located at: cd /usr/src/XF4 But everything I've ever read says the X source, XF4.tar.gz should be unpacked and stored in:

sk driver

2006-09-05 Thread Brian
I thought the issue with the watchdog timing out was fixed. I was seeding a torrent file this morning, so when I came home and turned it off, I received these errors: sk0: watchdog timeout sk0: cannot stop transfer of Tx descriptors I am running a kernel compiled as of last Saturday. Here's my

Re: pf.conf's example of tables using ports

2006-09-05 Thread Pablo Halamaj
On 06/09/06, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pablo Halamaj wrote: maybe i'm plain stupid or i have a weird install. All you have the following line at pf.conf ,that comes with OpenBSd 3.9,? #table httport { 80, 443 } no, that's something you (or someone) put in your machine. Thankz

Re: sk driver

2006-09-05 Thread Sam Chill
On 9/5/06, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought the issue with the watchdog timing out was fixed. I was seeding a torrent file this morning, so when I came home and turned it off, I received these errors: sk0: watchdog timeout sk0: cannot stop transfer of Tx descriptors I am running a