Hi folks,
I just noticed that in Germany Lehmanns (see OpenBSD's order-site)
already accepts pre-orders for OpenBSD 5.6-release.
Guess what I just did :-)
My little contribution to the project along with a big
THANK YOU to the devs!
Cheers,
STEFAN
Please don't do this and cancel your
On 2014-09-26, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
I do realizethee is a really old version of Amanda in the ports tree, and
yes it compiles, but it is too old to work with our server.
btw this old version has been removed post-5.5, it's too old to be useful.
We'd certainly be able to re-add Amanda if
On 2014-09-27 Sat 00:33 AM |, Nick Holland wrote:
I'd LOVE to think Google took security more seriously than other
dipshits in the computer industry, but sadly, the Android platform did
not show it. I have an Android phone, I would not trade it for an
iProduct...but I will never trust it or
On 2014-09-27 Sat 00:33 AM |, Nick Holland wrote:
Sorry, I've had the honor of working with some amazing malware experts
(AND the OpenBSD developers. Have I had a rockin' life or what? :),
Absolutely, like 11:33 of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S72I-nSgQek
frantisek holop, 25 Sep 2014 17:28:
for everybody out there who likes a good mystery,
the 900 ping issue has happened mid-day as well
for the first time. it is the equivalent of yanking
the ethernet cable. so it is not an exclusively
resume connected, but resume (and startup) is
a way to
On 09/26/14 11:55, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se
mailto:alexan...@beard.se wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to set up Pidgin to talk to our Lync servers at work, but it
seems somewhere after (or in) the TLS handshaking, it just
Later i will write the issue. But is before openssl/libressl switch and its
related to use nss libs instead ssl. And pidgin is ssilently refusing
server certs.
But later i will write it more deeper with some debug. I have pidgin / sipe
working without issues
Regards
El sep 27, 2014 1:37 p.m.,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 07:30:45AM +0100, OpenBSD Europe wrote:
Hi folks,
I just noticed that in Germany Lehmanns (see OpenBSD's order-site)
already accepts pre-orders for OpenBSD 5.6-release.
Guess what I just did :-)
My little contribution to the project along with a big
THANK
On 2014-09-25 Thu 15:18 PM |, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/24/bash_shell_vuln/
More vulnerabilities in #bashbug: #Shellshock becomes whack-a-mole
for security engineers http://ars.to/1uOtJcN
... he was able to bypass the fixes in the latest bash patch
and
On 09/27/14 20:15, Stefan Berger wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 07:30:45AM +0100, OpenBSD Europe wrote:
Hi folks,
I just noticed that in Germany Lehmanns (see OpenBSD's order-site)
already accepts pre-orders for OpenBSD 5.6-release.
Guess what I just did :-)
My little contribution to the
Thumbs up!
...but I will never trust it or use it for security critical purposes.
Me neither. Google itself is a security hole. Stasi would love it :)
My point was that application model, everything running on sandbox,
most of the applications running on bytecode machine with bounds
checking..
On 09/25/2014 10:25 PM, ian kremlin wrote:
/bin/sh is an implementation of *the bourne shell*, not the
bourne-again shell (bash). in any case, neither /bin/sh nor ksh are
vulnerable to the recent shellshock vulnerability.
Also, if OpenBSD had bash it still wouldn't be such a big issue as it is
Hey guys,
I have what I hope is a simple syntax question for pf rules. I have not been
able to
find any example of this online or in the man pages. I suspect it is perhaps
not possible.
Basically I want to allow out certain web services, with a simple rule like
below:
pass out on em0 proto
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:07:54 +0100
skin...@britvault.co.uk (Craig R. Skinner) wrote:
On 2014-09-27 Sat 00:33 AM |, Nick Holland wrote:
I'd LOVE to think Google took security more seriously than other
dipshits in the computer industry, but sadly, the Android platform did
not show it. I
On 27 Sep 2014 at 18:50, Andrew Lester wrote:
Hey guys,
I have what I hope is a simple syntax question for pf rules. I have not
been able to find any example of this online or in the man pages. I
suspect it is perhaps not possible. Basically I want to allow out
certain web services, with a
15 matches
Mail list logo