If you don't understand that snapshots get built, that libraries
crank, that there are PEOPLE building this, that the data takes time
to get to the mirrors, and that this is a non-static situation, that
small catch-up syncronization errors are made, that they get fixed by
real people,
On 2014-12-11, Stan Gammons sg063...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. The way I normally update is by downloading the install5x.iso, make
the cd and boot from it, do an upgrade, reboot, do a sysmerge, then do
pkg_add -u. After all the failures because of the library mismatch, kde4
will no longer start
Hi misc,
I have about 600 destinations to reach via wan1 and wan2.( 300 via wan1
and 300 via wan2 )
my /etc/mygate is *wan_gw1*
Let's say *ip_list1 and *
*ip_list2. **Let's assume /etc/ip_list1 and *
*/etc/ip_list2 have ip addresses in this format /etc/ip_list1* *(this
consists of about
The conversation is very META.
What is META?
That it is a discussion about a discussion, not about any topic of its own.
2014-12-11 12:37 GMT+01:00 Mihai Popescu mih...@gmail.com:
The conversation is very META.
What is META?
--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:27:46 -0500
STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
You might want to subscribe to the ports-changes changes list,
which will show you what's been changed. The source-changes
list will show you all the other cvs commits. Look at
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
Btw, now
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:59:55AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
Btw, now that the topic has come up. Is there a way to view the
diffs quickly on a source- or port-change?
Not official and not instantly updated:
http://anoncvs.estpak.ee/cgi-bin/cgit/openbsd-ports/log/
--
Oliver PETER
you could try http://anoncvs.estpak.ee/cgi-bin/cgit/openbsd-ports/log/
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:59 AM, FRIGN d...@frign.de wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:27:46 -0500
STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
You might want to subscribe to the ports-changes changes list,
which will show you
Followup:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
I have got Japanese input running and useable, by installing the packages
ja-fonts-gnu
ja-sazanami-ttf
ja-mplus-ttf
ibus-anthy
with pkg_add . I'm not
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Followup:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
I have got Japanese input running and useable, by installing the packages
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07:35PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
I have got Japanese input running and useable, by installing the packages
ja-fonts-gnu
ja-sazanami-ttf
ja-mplus-ttf
ibus-anthy
with pkg_add . I'm not comfortable that this is the most optimal way
to do it, but it allows me to
TL,DR:
Queries to DNS server over IPSec made using host or dig work OK,
requests made by e.g. ping exit the enc0 interface but don't show up on
enc0 on the other end.
Hi all
I'm puzzled by some weird stuff happening with DNS queries over IPSec. I
have a fully working tunnel over a roaming
On 2014-12-11, Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:59:55AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
Btw, now that the topic has come up. Is there a way to view the
diffs quickly on a source- or port-change?
Not official and not instantly updated:
On 12/11/14 05:59, FRIGN wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:27:46 -0500
STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
You might want to subscribe to the ports-changes changes list,
which will show you what's been changed. The source-changes
list will show you all the other cvs commits. Look at
One of my favorite ports is pfstat. I've used it religiously for
years with minor firewalls for bandwidth and queue graphs. When ALTQ
was retired, pfstat could no longer graph my queues and this is still
the case today. The correct behavior here would be for me to roll up
my college-level C
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X but
screen goes black. The only way i have to go to console is pressing
CTRL+ALT+F1 after
Hi, guys.
This might be more a question for ports@ but it is also a general do
you use it question.
I've been trying to help the MOC maintainer with testing changes on OpenBSD.
He wants to use some newer POSIX features but it seems that if he does
so, he'll have to leave OpenBSD behind. I
I've used MOC quite a bit on OpenBSD, though just a local compile -
nothing fancy like a port. It's probably the only non-base program I
ever use on the Sparc 5.
What specifically is missing?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Toohey
richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Hi, guys.
This
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects is grab a
fresh source tree and compile them manually. for example, libc:
cd /usr/src/lib/libc
edit 'shlib_version' to have the appropriate major/minor versions
On 2014-12-11 22:46:48, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Followup:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
I have
The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
I'll take the first option:
1. Stop using MOC
I'm a user of MOC when using Linux, because it's simple to config, but I think
the OpenBSD Project will be fine without MOC updates, and the users can switch
to mpd.
On 07/12/14 23:37, Martin Schröder wrote:
2014-12-06 9:45 GMT+01:00 Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch:
I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
Is OpenBSD actually a registered trademark? The
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
changes from upstream. If you have time for that, lucky you. But there
are more useful things to do, don't you
On 08/12/14 00:36, Bryan Steele wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:35:03PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
I agree entirely. For this reason, I think it would be best to keep
system internals (e.g. uname, includes, etc.) using the name OpenBSD
with only the main user-visible parts changed to a new
Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
changes from upstream. If you have
On 08/12/14 01:00, Luiz Roberto dos Santos wrote:
At 7 Dec 2014 12:42:41 + (UTC) from Kaspars Bankovskis
kasp...@bankovskis.net:
there are more useful things to do, don't you think so?
Agree. Riley, I think you don't get the point here. The firmware blob are
*not* running on the system,
On 12/12/14 15:25, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and
On 12/12/14 15:25, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and
On 08/12/14 01:07, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
However, remember that if someone doesn't know much about OpenBSD, they
will either: a) think that OpenBSD does not contain binary-only firmware
due to the Blob-Busters marketing or b) not know where to look to
remove it should
On 12/12/14 15:36, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 12/12/14 15:25, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
On 07/12/14 23:42, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
you'll be just renaming
I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes. The initial
error was probably the same as below, but led me to believe I may have
had some kind of kernel or system frankenbox behavior. I used cvs to
pull all the
I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes.
You were running -stable:
OpenBSD 5.6-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Dec 11 19:34:10 UTC 2014
The initial
error was probably the same as below, but led me to
Hey man,
I'm not sure about what is happening, but pflog is your best friend ever !
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/logging.html
Try find out if a specific rule is blocking traffic in one of endpoints (
both ? )
Cheers,
2014-12-11 14:13 GMT-02:00 Zé Loff zel...@zeloff.org:
TL,DR:
Queries to
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:05:46PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes.
You were running -stable:
OpenBSD 5.6-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Dec 11 19:34:10 UTC 2014
On 12.12.2014 02:50, Leonardo Santagostini wrote:
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a
fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X
but
screen goes black. The only way
On 12.12.2014 03:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
Hi, guys.
This might be more a question for ports@ but it is also a general do
you use it question.
I've been trying to help the MOC maintainer with testing changes on
OpenBSD.
He wants to use some newer POSIX features but it seems that if he
does
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 15:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
(3) can help with the POSIX questions.
The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
http://moc.daper.net/node/1369
I have no idea what posix features they want, so it's a tough question.
unistd.h does say
#define
On 12/12/14 01:50, Leonardo Santagostini wrote:
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X but
screen goes black. The only way i have
38 matches
Mail list logo
