First of all, I have no real clue. It sound weird. But maybe I can help
you at least with that one:
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2014, 16:13 + schrieb Zé Loff:
However, if I try to do something like ping -c 1 www_lan.foo.bar (or
e.g. ssh) I can see the packets with the DNS request pass through
On 12/12/14 19:48, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 15:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
(3) can help with the POSIX questions.
The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
http://moc.daper.net/node/1369
I have no idea what posix features they want, so it's a tough question.
li...@ggp2.com wrote:
I applied the newest unbound patch to several amd64 machines without
trouble, and have had issues on several of my i386 boxes. The initial
error was probably the same as below, but led me to believe I may have
had some kind of kernel or system frankenbox behavior. I
hi guys moving from openbsd 5.4 to 5.6 with a fresh install I've found Xorg
refuse to work.
I leave a Xorg and dmesg file with 5.4 and 5.6.
In the case of 5.4 xorg just works out of the box. I really don't know what
is missing.
thnks !!
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:03:56 -0430
elvis fuentes freebsdd...@gmail.com wrote:
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
which had a name of LogXorg5.6]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
which had a name of dmesg54]
[demime
On 12 December 2014 at 03:50, Leonardo Santagostini
lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello @misc,
This mail is regarding about issues that im facing after doing a fresh
install of 5.6 RELEASE and snapshot on my latptop
The point is that after installing sucessfully i am trying to start X but
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:08:42PM +0200, Johan Svensson wrote:
I'm trying to migrate from Linux to Openbsd on my laptop (thinkpad x201).
The first problem that i came across was that the Cpu fanspeed was running
constantly at 3500RPM.
After the acpithinkpad.c patch from jcs (and i modified
On 2014-12-12, ian kremlin i...@kremlin.cc wrote:
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects is grab a
fresh source tree and compile them manually. for example, libc:
cd /usr/src/lib/libc
edit
Hi Ian,
ian kremlin wrote on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:04:26PM -0500:
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects
Definitely not the easiest way. Waiting for the next snapshot is
definitely much easier and
ian kremlin wrote on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:04:26PM -0500:
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects
Definitely not the easiest way. Waiting for the next snapshot is
definitely much easier and
On Dec 12, 2014 1:06 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
ian kremlin wrote on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:04:26PM -0500:
whenever i grab a snapshot and get library version mismatches after a
`pkg_add -u`, i've found the easiest way to get those objects
Definitely not the
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
There are dragons.
ingo, theo:
sorry to post toxic advice, and thanks for the knowledge. i did not realize
how shlib_version worked. i must have gotten lucky with my build but i
should go back and fix it properly now
ian
12 matches
Mail list logo
