Re: Storage server HW advice/feedback req for setup overall & in particular reliability/QoS of SATA, to protect from controller- or BIOS-induced system crashes? Dedicated PCI SATA HBA needed??

On 2016-02-17 01:01, j...@bitminer.ca wrote: .. Why do you think you need to build such a device? Why don't you buy it? (Dell PowerEdge VRTX, HP hyper converged, etc) Colocation requires rack servers, but thanks for thinking about it. Some important things: - what is the purpose of this

Re: dhcrelay: send_packet: No buffer space available

On 18/02/16 15:52, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: On 18/02/16 13:22, Peter Hessler wrote: How many bpf devices do you have? You may need to create more. I have 20 bpf devices, 27 vlan interfaces, 27 carp interfaces, 17 dhcrelay processes. wasn't there a message when bpf devides were short?

Re: Storage server HW advice/feedback req for setup overall & in particular reliability/QoS of SATA, to protect from controller- or BIOS-induced system crashes? Dedicated PCI SATA HBA needed??

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:01:19PM +0700, Tinker wrote: > On 2016-02-17 01:01, j...@bitminer.ca wrote: > .. > >Why do you think you need to build such a device? Why don't you buy it? > > > >(Dell PowerEdge VRTX, HP hyper converged, etc) > > Colocation requires rack servers, but thanks for

Re: startx vs xdm

On Feb 19 08:53:15, s...@stsp.name wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > Probably not, because if I remove all my .x* files > > and keep just the .Xdefaults -> .Xresources which > > specifies the UTF8 locale for xterm, the same thing > > happens in (the default)

Re: startx vs xdm

> Can you please elaborate on why LC_CTYPE > is the one of the LC_* family to be set? > Or does the current locale support involve > anything else then CTYPE? Aha: find /usr/share/locale

Re: IPsec config with dynamic IP.

On 2016-02-18, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > My box cannot resolve the name "ike-v1.example.com" until > after isc_named is started which happens way late in the bootup That seems like a misconfiguration - apart from this issue, what if BIND crashes or you need

Re: general xdg-open configuration

On 2016-02-18, Jiri B wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:15:50PM +, Mike Burns wrote: >> On 2016-02-18 17.11.03 +0100, Rudolf Sykora wrote: >> > I appear to need to modify the default application used >> > by xdg-open to open a file directory. The man page of xdg-open >> > is

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On 2016-02-18, gwes wrote: > CUPS installs AVAHI. That is a security risk - it attempts > to change DNS lookups, etc. Can you expand on "it attempts to change DNS lookups"? Perhaps on OS with nsswitch via nss-mdns, but I don't see any way of getting it to do this on OpenBSD, even

Re: IPsec config with dynamic IP.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:36:04AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016-02-18, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > > My box cannot resolve the name "ike-v1.example.com" until > > after isc_named is started which happens way late in the bootup > > That seems like a

How does isakmpd determine which config stanza to use?

I have an ipsec setup using certificate/ca based authentication. The config looks like this: # $OpenBSD: ipsec.conf,v 1.5 2006/09/14 15:10:43 hshoexer Exp $ # my_fqdn="dynamic-0.example.com" my_v4_ip="192.168.1.1" my_v4_net="10.0.0.0/23" remote_fqdn="dynamic-1.example.com"

LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

http://libertybsd.net/ wrote: "What is LibertyBSD? OpenBSD is universally known as an operating system designed with security in mind, proudly being able to say that it has had "Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time!" However, OpenBSD ships with several pieces of

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:47:42PM +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote: > Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:38:38 + (GMT) Roderick > > Well, let me say my opinion. > > Why !? > > > I think BSD and Unix is also "outdated beyond rescue", but we are >

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

Jorge Luis [jorgeluiscorreioeletron...@gmail.com] wrote: > > Is true that in LibertyBSD, you can get all of the benefits of OpenBSD, > while being sure that there are no non-free blobs lurking in the depths of > your system? > Yes, in fact the OpenBSD developers are so enthusiastic about this

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

Recurring troll coming from gmail and nabble (you-name-it tomorrow). Zero entry effort. Wasted electricity and skin. Plain simply ignored.

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:38:38 + (GMT) Roderick > Well, let me say my opinion. Why !? > I think BSD and Unix is also "outdated beyond rescue", but we are ^^ This means "following standards and reliably implementing Unix core".

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

Em 19-02-2016 12:42, Jorge Luis escreveu: > "What is LibertyBSD? > OpenBSD is universally known as an operating system designed with security > in mind, proudly being able to say that it has had "Only two remote holes in > the default install, in a heck of a long time!" Will you please, please, go

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

I smell astroturfing troll machine. On 2016-02-19 16:46, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: Em 19-02-2016 12:42, Jorge Luis escreveu: "What is LibertyBSD? OpenBSD is universally known as an operating system designed with security in mind, proudly being able to say that it has had "Only two remote

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, li...@wrant.com wrote: Well, let me say my opinion. Why ?! I think, you missed the context of my two postings of yesterday. I do not see any problem with lpr/lpd, the only reason given here to change it is: * lpd(8)/lpc(8)/lpr(1) is very old and suffering from

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:52:43PM +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote: > > Maybe you should pull your head out of the sand (asshole) and understand > why you can not find relevant information. You're not reading man > pages, but people say. That previous request was not to include trolling me

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

Theo, I'd like to make a comment: I do not want to program and use computers to just a hobby to harm me, if all the software and hardware that exist include non-free code and if is true that non-free code can contain malicious code, I decide not to program and use computers to just a hobby. Is

support update

0 C USA P Texas T Pflugerville Z 78691 O HermeTek Network Solutions I James Shupe A P.O. Box 2264 M sa...@hermetek.com U https://www.hermetek.com/bsd-linux-support B 512.792.2525 X 512.888.9889 N We provide open infrastructure design, development, deployment, maintenance and training. We

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

On February 19, 2016 3:42:08 PM GMT+01:00, Jorge Luis wrote: >Is true that in LibertyBSD, you can get all of the benefits of OpenBSD, >while being sure that there are no non-free blobs lurking in the depths >of >your system? No. The firmware is either

Re: LibertyBSD, recently forked from OpenBSD, has been deblobbed as much as its creator could see?

I have very high expectations that this email thread will produce fresh new additions to http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/usr.bin/mg/theo.c very soon. -luis On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Alexander Hall wrote: > On February 19, 2016 3:42:08 PM

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On 17 Feb 2016, at 14:07, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:51:28PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote: >> >> The only thing wrong with lpd is nobody tedu'ed it yet. >> >> No really, it is outdated beyond rescue. If you want to write a new >> print job queueing system, sure, have fun.

Re: doas(1) and $PATH

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:17:55 -0500, Philippe Meunier wrote: > By the way, while playing with which(1) and doas(1) and $PATH, I > managed to get which(1) to core dump, twice, although I have not been > able to reproduce it reliably. The crash in which was fixed recently. - todd

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Chris Bennett wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:52:43PM +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote: Maybe you should pull your head out of the sand (asshole) and understand [...] That previous request was not to include trolling me privately. By the way, I only expressed my

Re: doas(1) and $PATH

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:45:28 -0700, "Todd C. Miller" wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:17:55 -0500, Philippe Meunier wrote: > > > By the way, while playing with which(1) and doas(1) and $PATH, I > > managed to get which(1) to core dump, twice, although I have not been > > able to reproduce it

Re: support update

Hi, James Shupe wrote on Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:06:49PM -0600: > 0 > C USA > P Texas > T Pflugerville > Z 78691 > O HermeTek Network Solutions > I James Shupe > A P.O. Box 2264 > M sa...@hermetek.com > U https://www.hermetek.com/bsd-linux-support > B 512.792.2525 > X 512.888.9889 > N We provide

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On 2016-02-19, Chris Bennett wrote: > Why don't hru...@gmail.com and li...@wrant.com have a lovely and > exciting chat off of my lpd/lpr thread? Funnily enough I didn't see either of those until they were quoted here ;) I recommend slrn pointed at gmane's