On Mon, April 11, 2016 7:55 pm, igor.kos wrote:
> I am confused using relayd & certificates & pf
>
> First of all, I want to do ssl-accel, so do I need to do "divert" in
> pf.conf,
> as:
>
> pass in quick inet proto tcp from lan:network to any port https divert-to
> localhost port 8443
>
You
Steve Shockley wrote:
> I have several machines running Smokeping on OpenBSD 5.8 amd64 to
> monitor latency through several web proxy servers. I have a lot of
> frequent monitors (mostly curl) so performance is degrading. Opening
> one of the Smokeping web pages can take 30-45 seconds at times,
Dear List members,
âCan someone please point me to where I can get the list of features
supported by ldapd? Also if possible, features not supported by ldapd.
Given the excellent documentation standards of OpenBSD - Am I right in
assuming, whatever is in the manpages for ldapd.conf and
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:31:35 + Robert Peichaer
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:22:31PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> > The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with
> > this name".
> > I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother,
I am confused using relayd & certificates & pf
First of all, I want to do ssl-accel, so do I need to do "divert" in pf.conf,
as:
pass in quick inet proto tcp from lan:network to any port https divert-to
localhost port 8443
or is it OK just to use IP of relayd device, as:
# $OpenBSD:
I have several machines running Smokeping on OpenBSD 5.8 amd64 to
monitor latency through several web proxy servers. I have a lot of
frequent monitors (mostly curl) so performance is degrading. Opening
one of the Smokeping web pages can take 30-45 seconds at times, but from
what I can see
Please don't post such things here.
On 2016 Apr 09 (Sat) at 09:36:47 -0300 (-0300), Jorge Luis wrote:
:I am posting just for fun.
--
One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they
never have to stop and answer the phone.
I am posting just for fun.
FreeBSD isn't Free.
* 4.3. Licensee shall not export, either directly or indirectly, any of
this
* software or system incorporating such software without first obtaining
any
* required license or other approval from the U. S. Department of Commerce
or
* any other
I remembered I have a sub to serial cable I always have to reboot with it
plugged in to work. Did that with the programmer and all is well.
Thanks,
Edgar
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2016, at 4:58 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> Is anyone using avrdude with usbasp programmer?
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jorge Luis
wrote:
> I am posting just for fun.
>
> FreeBSD isn't Free.
You are free to try posting this on the FreeBSD forums?
--
Raul
Kevin Chadwick writes:
>> Something like
>>
>> pass out ... proto udp from any to any port 53 user = _rebound
>>
>> same for tcp.
>
> Yeah but have you tried it and been successful without getting a syntax
> error?
This doesn't give a syntax error and seems to do what
> Something like
>
> pass out ... proto udp from any to any port 53 user = _rebound
>
> same for tcp.
Yeah but have you tried it and been successful without getting a syntax
error?
--
KISSIS - Keep It Simple So It's Securable
> Is anyone using avrdude with usbasp programmer? I can't seem to get things
> going.
I was using it long time ago, but I remember I set up the programmer
in a configuration file.
Post your dmesg with usbasp device plugged in, just to verify it it
properly recognized.
> *Dmesg extract*
> *Xorg.0.log extract*
Do post the full dmesg and Xorg logs inline, not on some internet
links. This way someone may help you.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Paco Esteban wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > Obviously, this is *not* a supported upgrade path so, if anything goes
> > wrong, you're on your own.
>
> If it goes wrong, I'll reinstall ;-)
>
> Thanks Raf.
By the way, upgrade was completed without any
I have network connectivity and DNS seems Ok. The build is 1459828632, from Apr
5.
And now the system is broken (panic):
Stopped at debugger+0x9: leave
debugger() at debugger+0x9
panic() at panic+0xfe
setroot() at setroot+0xa59
diskconf() at diskconf+0xe3
main() at main+0x538
Sorry, but I
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:16:42PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
>
> Just an idea, before providing a diff, does it look like a good
> candidate to go into FAQ13.4? Thank you for your consideration.
>
Yes, this would be good candidate (for the FAQ 13.5), as this is
not the first time this is
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:22:31PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with
> this name".
> I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother, ftp.openbsd.org), none work
> for me.
>
> I has been a hard time to work with
The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with this
name".
I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother, ftp.openbsd.org), none work
for me.
I has been a hard time to work with snapshots since last month... many bugs.
I'm using snapshots to help reporting bugs, of
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:53:44PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> I have network connectivity and DNS seems Ok. The build is 1459828632, from
> Apr 5.
> And now the system is broken (panic):
>
> Stopped at debugger+0x9: leave
> debugger() at debugger+0x9
> panic() at panic+0xfe
> setroot()
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 06:31:35PM +, Robert Peichaer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:22:31PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> > The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with
> > this name".
> > I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother,
21 matches
Mail list logo