Re: Removal of old libraries

On Nov 14 00:14:19, pa...@ecentryx.com wrote: > But the very next step in the upgrade blows away the system by overwriting > it anyway. Right? > > What could happen? What if following the normal procedure of untaring the OS > sets on top of the existing system fails midway? Then you have an >

Re: OSPFD over IPSEC

On 2016-11-14 12:48, Comète wrote: Hi, I'm trying to run OSPFD over IPSEC with OpenBSD 6.0 stable, so I first start looking at http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article=20131105075303 Now that etherip has it's own interface in 6.0, I tried to replace gif with etherip like this: On one host:

Re: OSPFD over IPSEC

14 novembre 2016 14:50 "Remi Locherer" a écrit: > On 2016-11-14 12:48, Comète wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm trying to run OSPFD over IPSEC with OpenBSD 6.0 stable, so I first >> start looking at > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article=20131105075303 >> Now that etherip has it's

Re: Mount HDD USB on 6.0 Stable: Fail

Unfortunately, from time to time FUSE hangs my system. So I have to use -F to disable FUSE.

Re: Running OpenSMTPD at home behind a cloud proxy

Why not use opensmtpd on the VPS to relay your mail ? A rule like "accept for domain example.com relay via secure://you.dynamic.dns" should do what you want if I read the man correctly 2016-11-13 23:25 GMT+01:00 Jiri B : > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:51:22PM +0100, Joris Vanhecke

OSPFD over IPSEC

Hi, I'm trying to run OSPFD over IPSEC with OpenBSD 6.0 stable, so I first start looking at http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article=20131105075303 Now that etherip has it's own interface in 6.0, I tried to replace gif with etherip like this: On one host: -=>> cat

Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Alan Corey wrote: > This sounds like heel-dragging to me, or they're trying to do it under > Windows or something: >

Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

OK, it's relevant to OpenBSD because I wouldn't consider anything else safe enough to run on the servers. Not that I'm in a position to do any of it. The servers could even be run from custom official live CDs so they were harder to tamper with, with maybe a RAM drive for speed. There seems to

Re: OSPFD over IPSEC

14 novembre 2016 14:50 "Remi Locherer" a écrit: > On 2016-11-14 12:48, Comète wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm trying to run OSPFD over IPSEC with OpenBSD 6.0 stable, so I first >> start looking at > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article=20131105075303 >> Now that etherip has it's

Re: Mount HDD USB on 6.0 Stable: Fail

On 11/14/16 13:03, Alexey Vatchenko wrote: > Unfortunately, from time to time FUSE hangs my system. So I have to > use -F to disable FUSE. $ /usr/local/libexec/hotplug-diskmount cleanup 3AS $ /usr/local/libexec/hotplug-diskmount attach -u $USER -m 0700 -F 3AS $ mount /dev/sd0a on / type ffs

Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

On 11/14/2016 22:19, Alan Corey wrote: OK, it's relevant to OpenBSD because I wouldn't consider anything else safe enough to run on the servers. Not that I'm in a position to do any of it. The servers could even be run from custom official live CDs so they were harder to tamper with, with

Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

So yes, back to my original point. A Civic's blockchain, one that does not rely on the integrity (or rather is resilient to) the system it runs on, or the security of the transmission media ; as a platform for use in civic's - needs to exist first. Block-chains are relatively new and we are still

Re: Removal of old libraries

Jan Stary wrote on 11/14/16 03:00: On Nov 14 00:14:19, pa...@ecentryx.com wrote: But the very next step in the upgrade blows away the system by overwriting it anyway. Right? What could happen? What if following the normal procedure of untaring the OS sets on top of the existing system fails

Re: Mount HDD USB on 6.0 Stable: Fail

Ok, Last night, i formatted again my HDD under Windows 7, in NTFS - normal mode. This taked more than 3 hours. After i connect at my laptop under OBSD. It's same result. $ disklabel sd1 # /dev/rsd1c: type: SCSI disk: SCSI disk label: 3AS duid: flags:

Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

This sounds like heel-dragging to me, or they're trying to do it under Windows or something: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/17/more-than-30-states-offer-online-voting-but-experts-warn-it-isnt-secure/ It seems simple to me, you use firewalls and only make the results

Re: OSPFD over IPSEC

14 novembre 2016 22:50 "Remi Locherer" a écrit: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:50:21PM +, Comète wrote: > >> 14 novembre 2016 14:50 "Remi Locherer" a écrit: >> On >> 2016-11-14 12:48, Comète wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I'm trying to run OSPFD over >>

Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

[Off-topic; sorry. It's important to remind people of this issue, but I won't follow up any further.] This sort of security, no matter how well done, doesn't address one of the very important but often forgotten features of voting in person at a polling place: it makes it very difficult to

Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?

You need a civic blockchain or some-such that guarantee's data integrity and agnosticism of the platform that anyone can verify. The interface into / mechanics once you have a blockchain which you can issue tokens from is the simple bit. Not sure this is relevant for this list tho. -Joel On 14

Re: OSPFD over IPSEC

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:50:21PM +, Comète wrote: > 14 novembre 2016 14:50 "Remi Locherer" a écrit: > > On > 2016-11-14 12:48, Comète wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I'm trying to run OSPFD over > IPSEC with OpenBSD 6.0 stable, so I first > >> start looking at > >