Hi,
Before I wrote this email I searched under marc.info and did a google search,
but I didn't get a definitive answer. I found this under openbsd.org:
https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Whoever put that together I thank thee.
In code, I see the (c) and the (C) used interchangibly, I'm
Hi everyone!
I noticed facette became broken in 6.7. Do you guys use any neat tool to graph
collectd RRDs? Preferrably in ports or at most something git-pullable but with
no outside deps (relative to base or ports).
Thanks for the input!
Dani
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 9:10 AM Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before I wrote this email I searched under marc.info and did a google search,
> but I didn't get a definitive answer. I found this under openbsd.org:
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
>
> Whoever put that together I thank
Happy birthday Theo!
On your 22nd anniversary of releasing OpenBSD 2.3
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
it seems i figured out why userland was 'broken' on recompiled kernel
with changed RT_TABLEID_MAX.
I dont think things are really broken, may be i dont them right way, please
advice.
I could reproduce the issue (all steps are done exactly as in openbsd.org
faq).
I changed RT_TABLEID_MAX,
as i understand, kernel relinking currently used object file and installs
new kernel.
what i do not understand is how could it 'rollback' kernel changes done
during compilation,
if it using current object files which arre built during compilation.
Just one note, i not yet rebooted after
Thank you much.
Do you mean i should not do syspatch if a modified kernel sources?
When reading KARL notes i tough that it only incompatible with kernel
changed
with config -e or kernel configuration file, which i did not modified.
What about kernel relinking at boot time?
Kernel changes was
Hi,
sounds strange, but is anyone else seeing mfs mounted fs
loosing permissions after reboot in -current (12h old)?
I saw lots of permission denied errors for /tmp while
trying to build via dpb. Reason was /tmp mounted 755
after boot.
# chmod 1777 /tmp; ls -l /
drwxrwxrwt 6 root wheel
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:21:13AM +0300, Bars Bars wrote:
> it seems i figured out why userland was 'broken' on recompiled kernel
> with changed RT_TABLEID_MAX.
> I dont think things are really broken, may be i dont them right way, please
> advice.
>
> I could reproduce the issue (all steps are
The same thing, but for 6.7p0.
Cheers,
Alex
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:54 PM Alex Naumov
wrote:
> Hey,
> there is a typo on /cvs/www/rpki-client/portable.html
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
Index: rpki-client-portable.html.head
===
RCS file:
On 2020-05-19, Mark Patruck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sounds strange, but is anyone else seeing mfs mounted fs
> loosing permissions after reboot in -current (12h old)?
Problem tracked down, diff is on bugs@.
>
> I saw lots of permission denied errors for /tmp while
> trying to build via dpb. Reason
Bars Bars wrote:
> Thank you much.
>
> Do you mean i should not do syspatch if a modified kernel sources?
syspatches can deliver replacements for kernel .o files
So if you have changed a .h or .c file, the syspatches are not
going to work correctly.
Once you use source-code methods, you
On 2020-05-19 13:45, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-05-19, Mark Patruck wrote:
Hi,
sounds strange, but is anyone else seeing mfs mounted fs
loosing permissions after reboot in -current (12h old)?
Problem tracked down, diff is on bugs@.
Thanks. Missed that one.
I saw lots of
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:43:19PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Some of these documents have a proprietary licence attached to it and
> I believe it's due to the 1994 AT settlement. There are third party
> collections (like this: https://github.com/sergev/4.4BSD-Lite2) but
> I'm not sure if one
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:25:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 2020-04-10 10:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:35:16AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > FWIW, my soekris net5501 with 256MB of RAM and 512MB swap does manage
> > to relink a kernel (on 6.6 + syspatches).
>
>
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:25:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 2020-04-10 10:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:35:16AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > FWIW, my soekris net5501 with 256MB of RAM and
thanks, i got it.
so probably i should manually patch, recompile and install kernel again.
Then should i care about boot time kernel re-linking if i have such a
custom kernel?
Claudio, please, do not forget to advice with the question about
RT_TABLEID_MAX itself,
i hope i clarified you what im
Hi,
just for info: Upgrading from 6.6 to 6.7 worked without flaws on my
OpenBSD VMs on Linux/KVM and FreeBSD/bhyve hypervisors! 6.7 feels faster
and snappier! Thanks to you all for your hard work!
Regards,
infoomatic
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 13:31, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:43:19PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > Some of these documents have a proprietary licence attached to it and
> > I believe it's due to the 1994 AT settlement. There are third party
> > collections (like this:
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:36:56PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> congrats to the new release.
>
> Question about https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade67.html:
> Shouldn't it be
>
> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
> net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
>
> Thats what I found in my sysctl.conf
> Proposed release poster design:
> Puffy with puffed out cheeks & paper sticking out of his mouth.
> Headline: "Man pages are all you need to live!"
> Alternate headlines:
> "We *can* live on man pages alone!"
I think it's better to clarify who this "we" is/are.
Not _all_ needed info for install
Hi folks,
congrats to the new release.
Question about https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade67.html:
Shouldn't it be
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
Thats what I found in my sysctl.conf (before upgrade).
Regards
Harri
Levai, Daniel wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I noticed facette became broken in 6.7. Do you guys use any neat tool to
> graph collectd RRDs? Preferably in ports or at most something
> git-pullable but with no outside deps (relative to base or ports).
>
> Thanks for the input!
>
> Dani
Hi Dani,
First of all, I'd like to thank everyone who replied to me!
Thank you for explaining things.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:59 PM Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Andras Farkas wrote on Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:07:36PM -0400:
> > For example, I first learnt vi a few years ago, back
> > when I was first learning
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 17:39, infoomatic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just for info: Upgrading from 6.6 to 6.7 worked without flaws on my
> OpenBSD VMs on Linux/KVM and FreeBSD/bhyve hypervisors! 6.7 feels faster
> and snappier! Thanks to you all for your hard work!
You might want to share how you did it.
Hello guys.
Today, I've installed OpenBSD 6.7 on Windows 10 pro ( Hyper-V ) which I
already has 6.6 running very well.
So, the planning was:
Migrate my conf's, turn off my 6.6 and make use of 6.7.
1 - By default hyper-v add's one processor. In the end of my fresh install
it doesn't work (
> On 14 May 2020, at 4:22 pm, mabi wrote:
>
> Hi Iain,
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 7:55 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
>
>> More details are at:https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=156229058006706=2
>
> I actually already read that one after seeing the
27 matches
Mail list logo
