Hi,
in relayd.conf I'm trying to do :
pass from 192.168.1.1 path "/something.html"
If I individually specify the "from" or the "path", it works
but when I combine both, it doesn't work.
Am I missing something or if it's just not possible ?
Or is there another way to express this another way ?
Hi,
I tried to boot VisionFive 2 RISC-V SBC board [1] with a current
OpenBSD snapshot and I got it to boot from a SD card after replacing
the Linux root partition on the image provided by the vendor
with an OpenBSD partition.
I guess it's still early days and that could be why I couldn't find
Tried this:
pkg_delete wireguard-tools
pkg_delete -a(which removes bash-5.2.15)
then
pkg_add wireguard-tools (which also reinstalls bash-5.2.15)
And it resolved the issue on all 3 systems.
0
C Japan
P Niigata
F 4 times a year
O Echigo BSD Users Group
M inqu...@ebug.jp
U https://www.ebug.jp
N *BSD
Have you tried rebuilding it?
On 2023/06/05 09:47, Sonic wrote:
> What I find odd is that it dumps core on 3 of the 5 systems but works
> fine on the other two. All systems are x64 at OpenBSD 7.3-current
> (GENERIC.MP) #1216 with wireguard-tools-1.0.20210914p1v0.
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:51
What I find odd is that it dumps core on 3 of the 5 systems but works
fine on the other two. All systems are x64 at OpenBSD 7.3-current
(GENERIC.MP) #1216 with wireguard-tools-1.0.20210914p1v0.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:51 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 2023-06-05, Sonic wrote:
> > After
On 2023-06-05, Sonic wrote:
> After upgrading several systems to the latest snapshot this evening
> most of them are causing core dumps when running wg:
>
> # wg
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> This is with:
> wireguard-tools-1.0.20210914p1v0
wireguard-tools had a port REVISION bump,
On 2023-06-05, Radek wrote:
> RipGrep caused my issue. When I replaced ripgrep with ggrep the script
> started to work fine.
Can you try a new ripgrep binary built with a different target-cpu type
for me please? The default for the rust compiler is to use SSE instructions
which aren't present
On 2023-06-05, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
> Next I tried -fno-fixup-gadgets, and that made a radical difference:
Not entirely a surprise, we have seen this a few times now.
Usually it is fine, but has quite bad effects on some programs,
however it is quite a nice mitigation (big reduction in the
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 06:07:32PM +0300, Nick Andersen wrote:
> Hi Folks,
hi.
>
> I am writing to seek assistance regarding an issue I am experiencing in
> trying to route my Personal Computer's network traffic to a TUN interface.
> My objective is to modify some of its content and
Just realized that if I edit the subject it will create a new thread in
marc.info.
So.. closing the thread, the solution is here:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=168594789107213=2
Sorry for the mess.
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 17:37:08 -0500
Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> Unfortunately it looks like sh
11 matches
Mail list logo
