ADSL with german t-online
Hi, i have a problem with PPPoE and t-online. Right now i'm using userspace pppd with the following ppp.conf: default: set log Phase Chat IPCP CCP tun command set redial 20+10-8 0 set reconnect 15 5 pppoe: set device "!/usr/sbin/pppoe -i ep2" disable acfcomp protocomp deny acfcomp set mtu max 1454 set crtscts off set speed sync enable lqr set lqrperiod 5 set dial set login set timeout 0 set authname "x" set authkey "x" add! default HISADDR enable dns resolv readonly enable mssfixup set urgent tcp 22 set socket /var/run/pppctl.%d "" 600 everything works fine - except when the link dies. After that, I get the following in ppp.log: [...] Jul 8 12:03:14 plato ppp[25280]: tun0: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 217.0.116.36 Jul 8 12:03:14 plato ppp[25280]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Oops, RCR in Initial. Jul 8 12:03:17 plato ppp[25280]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(119) state = Initial Jul 8 12:03:17 plato ppp[25280]: tun0: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 217.0.116.36 Jul 8 12:03:17 plato ppp[25280]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Oops, RCR in Initial. Jul 8 12:03:18 plato ppp[25280]: tun0: Phase: Clearing choked output queue [... and more of the same ...] I am starting pppd this way: # cat /etc/hostname.tun0 !/usr/sbin/ppp -ddial -unit 0 pppoe Any ideas what the problem might be? note: i also tried using kernel pppoe when setting up the system, but that did not work at all. Benno -- Sebastian Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: undeadly dead
On 7/10/05, sbr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just curious, anyone know what happend to undeadly? > > been down for nearly two days now. do they need a new server or something, > it looks like its hosted by bob so he should be able to come up with > something :-) > > its not fun when your homepage is down > I 've been thinking its a prob with my net connection cause sometimes i don't get some selected sites. seems it is down for some reason :-( kind regards Siju
Re: OpenBSD log server
Well. let's try what you have. Any other links would also be helpful On Sunday 10 July 2005 06:13 pm, Steve Shockley wrote: > Qv6 wrote: > > I have set up an OBSD firewall to replace my PIX, and configured it > > to log to an OBSD log server - a loghost. I'll like to set up a web > > interface to monitor the logs using msyslog (with mysql and php). > > Has anyone on this list done something similar and if so, what > > syslog utility did you use. > > I used syslog-ng and a very modified php-syslog-ng. I wanted to use > postgresql, and started out thinking I'd just convert php-syslog-ng > to use pgsql, but then found a bunch of bugs and holes, and some > *really* bad HTML. I fixed it up, fixed most of the bugs, and used > Pear DB for the database interface so it's not database-specific. > > Meanwhile, someone else noticed the same bugs I did, and apparently > fixed them in the version on Sourceforge. If you want to use mysql, > the new version might be okay now. Or let me know and I'll give you > my version, which shouldn't be that hard to make work in mysql.
Re: 400Mbps PF based firewall, which hardware?
oops, wrong list
Re: 400Mbps PF based firewall, which hardware?
SG> Since your network is only 100Mpbs my recommendation is a dlink ehternet card. SG> Now I may not be fully correct but from my experience it performs well :-) AFAIK D-Link NICs is worst choice. Two reasons: 1. D-link NICs always was cheap low-end solution. 2. Couple months ago D-link switched it's NICs from RTL8139 (pretty stable) to VIA Rhino III chip (which has problems under OpenBSD) without any changes in model number. VIA chips has permanent problems w/ OpenBSD - it hangs and stops responding network connected to it (tcpdump(8) or reboot can reset NIC until next fault). Maybe, due driver imperfection. So I recommend you to avoid VIA NICs. Ilya A. Kovalenko S.A.
OpenBSD environment need
Hey folks, i have finnished writing some tools for system administrators and unix users in general related stuff. Right now, i am managing the find people in each OS arena how could provide an environment where i could stress my application performance. So, i request for that in this list. This box/environment is supposed to offer a high demand for processing in regards to what my tools delivers. If i have a positive feedback for the conducted tests i wil be building ports for them. Some of the aspects of my tools: Performance: concious usage of cpu cycles and memory cells. Portability: design to operate correctly in any posix environment and compiled by any ANSI C compiler. Correctness: theses tools are not supposed to compromise your system security. Reliability: they delivers what they are supposed to do, no less no more, i.e., no side effects. If some one have and OBSD environment (i am not requesting shell access to them), let me know, please. Thanks a lot for your time and cooperation. Best regards, Gustavo. PS: Here is a list on what i purpose: algr: safe and reliable event log commit to persistent storage device, an substitute for DJB multilog. acd: an substitute for DJB CDB. rsc: manages system resources in a portable fashion between posix systems. mac: evaluates message authentication code for streams. srlmt: runs an executable with a system resource configuration. And, of course, they are all BSD license style.
Re: OpenBSD log server
Qv6 wrote: I have set up an OBSD firewall to replace my PIX, and configured it to log to an OBSD log server - a loghost. I'll like to set up a web interface to monitor the logs using msyslog (with mysql and php). Has anyone on this list done something similar and if so, what syslog utility did you use. I used syslog-ng and a very modified php-syslog-ng. I wanted to use postgresql, and started out thinking I'd just convert php-syslog-ng to use pgsql, but then found a bunch of bugs and holes, and some *really* bad HTML. I fixed it up, fixed most of the bugs, and used Pear DB for the database interface so it's not database-specific. Meanwhile, someone else noticed the same bugs I did, and apparently fixed them in the version on Sourceforge. If you want to use mysql, the new version might be okay now. Or let me know and I'll give you my version, which shouldn't be that hard to make work in mysql.
Re: hw.setperf not available
Hi, > The hw.setperf sysctl is for CPUs that support running at various > speeds through mechanisms such as Intel's SpeedStep (such as the > Pentium M). I wonder whether AMD's Cool 'n Quiet feature works > similarly; haven't tested it yet. > > Unless I'm badly mistaken, Pentium 3 chips do not support such a > feature, making it rather useless to return a value (or set one, for > that matter). Feel free to enlighten me if I'm wrong. The Pentium 3 mobile supports Intel's SpeedStep and the Ultra-Low-Voltage-Version supports the Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology. My BIOS has some switches to configure various basic options, but afaik the dynamic cpu scaling is part of the OS. > > How about the snapshot-version? > > On a different note, you may want to try APM (or its counterpart ACPI > that is currently being worked on). If your CPU doesn't support > slowing down, I suppose you're out of luck. I'm still using apm and for example suspend works very well. But I also want to use cpu throttling. And as far as I know I had to use hw.setperf for that. Or correct me if I'm wrong. bossk
Unlock your ACCOUNT
[IMAGE] Dear LaSalle Bank customer, We recently noticed one or more attempts to login intro your LaSalle Bank online banking account for a foreign IP address and we have reasons to believe that your account was hijacked by a third party without your notification. If you recently logged intro your account while traveling to a foreign country, the unusual login attempts may have been made by you. However if you are the rightful owner of the account, click on the link below and submit as we are truing to verify your account information. (In case you are not enrolled use your Social Security number as you User ID and the first six digits of your Social Security number as a password). https://lasallebank.com/online/unlock_account.jsp The login attempt was made from : IP: 68.194.11.124 ISP Host: ool-44c20b7c.dyn.optonline.net IF YOU CHOSE TO IGNORE OUR REQUEST, WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND YOUR ONLINE BANKING ACCOUNT.
Re: Building READMEs
On Sunday 10 of July 2005 22:31, Nick Holland wrote: > uh..no. > 188MHz is usually 75MHz x 2.5 multiplier. > Pentium MMX processors and the chips around them expect a 66MHz bus. > > SO..you are underclocking the core clock speed, but overclocking your > RAM, and overclocking the frontside of your processor. That's basically > the worst of both worlds -- the risks of overclocking, and none of the > benefit. > > Nick. Ah, thank you. Tomorrow I'll try to get the jumpers right again, though IIRC last time something labeled as 66 MHz x 3 multiplier gave me like 216 MHz... viq -- Najnowsze wiadomosci!!! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f18a0
Re: hw.setperf not available
On 7/10/05, bossk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] it's a common cpu type and it's not supported? That's bad. The hw.setperf sysctl is for CPUs that support running at various speeds through mechanisms such as Intel's SpeedStep (such as the Pentium M). I wonder whether AMD's Cool 'n Quiet feature works similarly; haven't tested it yet. Unless I'm badly mistaken, Pentium 3 chips do not support such a feature, making it rather useless to return a value (or set one, for that matter). Feel free to enlighten me if I'm wrong. > How about the snapshot-version? On a different note, you may want to try APM (or its counterpart ACPI that is currently being worked on). If your CPU doesn't support slowing down, I suppose you're out of luck. Cheers, Rogier -- If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
OpenBSD log server
Folks, I have set up an OBSD firewall to replace my PIX, and configured it to log to an OBSD log server - a loghost. I'll like to set up a web interface to monitor the logs using msyslog (with mysql and php). Has anyone on this list done something similar and if so, what syslog utility did you use. Msyslog looks nice, but I'm trying to see if someone can provide some lead on a different utility. TIA, -- Qv6 |_| | | |_| | | | | |_| | | |_|
Re: Building READMEs
viq wrote:
> dmesg attached, maybe that will give anyone an idea.
> CPU is running at 188 MHz, but it's actually an underclocked 200MHz Pentium
> MMX - I never managed to get the jumpers straight, and i figured running it
> at a bit lower speed is safer than making it run too fast.
>
> viq
>
>
> OpenBSD 3.7-current (GENERIC) #232: Thu Jul 7 15:39:44 MDT 2005
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
> cpu0: Intel Pentium/MMX ("GenuineIntel" 586-class) 188 MHz
uh..no.
188MHz is usually 75MHz x 2.5 multiplier.
Pentium MMX processors and the chips around them expect a 66MHz bus.
SO..you are underclocking the core clock speed, but overclocking your
RAM, and overclocking the frontside of your processor. That's basically
the worst of both worlds -- the risks of overclocking, and none of the
benefit.
Nick.
Re: Building READMEs
dmesg attached, maybe that will give anyone an idea.
CPU is running at 188 MHz, but it's actually an underclocked 200MHz Pentium
MMX - I never managed to get the jumpers straight, and i figured running it
at a bit lower speed is safer than making it run too fast.
viq
OpenBSD 3.7-current (GENERIC) #232: Thu Jul 7 15:39:44 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium/MMX ("GenuineIntel" 586-class) 188 MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,MMX
cpu0: F00F bug workaround installed
real mem = 133799936 (130664K)
avail mem = 115515392 (112808K)
using 1658 buffers containing 6791168 bytes (6632K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(fe) BIOS, date 10/28/97, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfb440
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown
apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xb8b8
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfddb0/128 (6 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 9 10 11
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 ("Intel 82371SB ISA" rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x800
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82439TX System" rev 0x01
pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA" rev 0x01
pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 "Intel 82371AB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0
wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0:
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 32253MB, 66055248 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0:
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 1549MB, 3173184 sectors
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 1
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: SCSI0 5/cdrom
removable
wd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
cd0(pciide0:1:1): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
uhci0 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 "Intel 82371AB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
"Intel 82371AB Power" rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 not configured
ne3 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "Realtek 8029" rev 0x00: irq 10
ne3: address 00:c0:df:f8:6c:48
vga1 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "S3 Trio32/64" rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
rl0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "Realtek 8139" rev 0x10: irq 9 address
00:0a:cd:06:2d:c1
rlphy0 at rl0 phy 0: RTL internal phy
xl0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "3Com 3c905C 100Base-TX" rev 0x78: irq 11,
address 00:04:75:9d:89:e5
exphy0 at xl0 phy 24: 3Com internal media interface
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0:
spkr0 at pcppi0
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec
biomask f965 netmask ff65 ttymask ffe7
pctr: 586-class performance counters and user-level cycle counter enabled
dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80
dkcsum: wd1 matched BIOS disk 81
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
Najnowsze wiadomosci!!! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f18a0
Re: hw.setperf not available
> > > > I have a little problem with hw.setperf. I installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my
> > > > Thinkpad x21. Everything works fine.
> > > > Except sysctl -w hw.setperf=*. I always get this message that
> > > > "sysctl: hw.setperf: value is not available" and I have no clue what
> > > > to do. Google doesn't help.
> > > >
> > > > Some information could be usefull:
> > > > hw.model=Intel Pentium 3 ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
> > > > hw.machine=i386
>
> your cpu isn't supported.
Oh...like I supposed. Hmm...it's a common cpu type and it's not supported?
That's bad.
Ok...let's look at my options. How about the snapshot-version? Or is there a
development-version, which
supports my cpu?
I really like OpenBSD and I want to keep it ;)
bossk
Re: Cross-Compiling OpenBSD
Sean Brown wrote: > On July 10, 2005 1:56 am, Tom Cosgrove wrote: ... >> OpenBSD is an entire operating system, designed to >> be built on OpenBSD - and not even cross-compiled on a different >> processor architecture of the same operating system. > > Which would be all well and good if it wern't for the fact that under the > projects goals it lists > > Provide a good cross compile/development platform. > > Which is probably a good reason why people, including my self once, have > asked > why cross compiling doesn't work on OpenBSD. Those people aren't developers. There is a huge difference between people who want to build OpenBSD on their fast system to run on their slow platform so they can say "look what I did" and someone who is bringing on-line a new platform. IF you are attempting to bring on-line a new platform, OpenBSD will provide a good developement environment to do so. But then, if that's what you are trying to do, you will not be asking "how do I do this?" on the mail lists. You will understand the tools, you will look at the Makefiles, and you will find and fix the issues you encounter. If you got to ask how to do these things, you don't have the skills and knowledge to do what you need to use these tools. (BTW: IF you follow the OpenBSD philosophy, your first goal will be to bring the system to native building as your first major task.) If your machine is too slow to do what you need it to do, you need a faster machine. Cross compiling is not the answer to your problem. OpenBSD developers have certain goals in their life; helping people who don't know what they are doing to do things they shouldn't be is NOT one of them. Which would you rather have developers doing...adding new features, cleaning up code, improving existing operation...or helping users do silly things with no value added to the project? Nick.
Re: hw.setperf not available
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, bossk wrote:
> > > I have a little problem with hw.setperf. I installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my
> > > Thinkpad x21. Everything works fine.
> > > Except sysctl -w hw.setperf=*. I always get this message that
> > > "sysctl: hw.setperf: value is not available" and I have no clue what
> > > to do. Google doesn't help.
> > >
> > > Some information could be usefull:
> > > hw.model=Intel Pentium 3 ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
> > > hw.machine=i386
your cpu isn't supported.
--
And that's why I had to kill them all.
Re: Building READMEs
Bah, now it crashed building index... Can anyone point me to something that will help me determine the reason of the crashes? And i'm playing with qemu, going to compare its performance with vmware, if anyone is interested i can post the results. viq -- Najnowsze wiadomosci!!! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f18a0
Re: hw.setperf not available
> > I have a little problem with hw.setperf. I installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my
> > Thinkpad x21. Everything works fine.
> > Except sysctl -w hw.setperf=*. I always get this message that
> > "sysctl: hw.setperf: value is not available" and I have no clue what
> > to do. Google doesn't help.
> >
> > Some information could be usefull:
> > hw.model=Intel Pentium 3 ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
> > hw.machine=i386
>
> Some information could be useful, such as a dmesg. Please send to the
> list.
No problem! The dmesg output is in the attachment
thx.
bossk
OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 697 MHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
real mem = 402169856 (392744K)
avail mem = 359841792 (351408K)
using 4278 buffers containing 20209664 bytes (19736K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(6e) BIOS, date 06/19/01, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd820
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: battery life expectancy 13%
apm0: AC on, battery charge low, charging
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd7b0/0x850
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdee0/208 (11 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 ("Intel 82371FB ISA" rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #3 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xd000! 0xcd000/0x1800 0xd8000/0x4000! 0xdc000/0x1000!
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82443BX AGP" rev 0x03
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 82443BX AGP" rev 0x03
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "ATI Mobility 1" rev 0x64
wsdisplay0 at vga1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA" rev 0x02
pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 "Intel 82371AB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0
wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0:
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38154MB, 78140160 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 disabled (no drives)
uhci0 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 "Intel 82371AB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
"Intel 82371AB Power Mgmt" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 not configured
cbb0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 "Ricoh 5C476 CardBus" rev 0x80: irq 11
cbb1 at pci0 dev 8 function 1 "Ricoh 5C476 CardBus" rev 0x80: irq 11
fxp0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 "Intel 82557" rev 0x0c, i82550: irq 11, address
00:03:47:8e:52:66
inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 4
"AT&T/Lucent LTMODEM" rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 10 function 1 not configured
clct0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Cirrus Logic CS4281 CrystalClear Audio" rev
0x01 irq 11
ac97: codec id 0x43525914 (Cirrus Logic CS4297A rev 4)
ac97: codec features headphone, 20 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, Crystal Semi 3D
audio0 at clct0
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0 (mux 1 ignored for console): console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0:
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 2 device 0 cacheline 0x0, lattimer 0xb0
pcmcia0 at cardslot0
cardslot1 at cbb1 slot 1 flags 0
cardbus1 at cardslot1: bus 3 device 0 cacheline 0x0, lattimer 0xb0
pcmcia1 at cardslot1
biomask effd netmask effd ttymask
pctr: 686-class user-level performance counters enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
More to pcidevs
Hello! PCI devices found on Acer Aspire 1360 laptop. --- pcidevs.origSun Jul 10 18:54:17 2005 +++ pcidevs Sun Jul 10 18:59:09 2005 @@ -2588,6 +2588,7 @@ product TI PCI4510_FW 0x8029 PCI4510 FireWire product TI PCI4520_FW 0x802A PCI4520 FireWire product TI PCI7410_FW 0x802B PCI7(4-6)10 FireWire +product TI PCI7420_FW 0x802E PCI7x20 FireWire product TI ACX100A 0x8400 ACX100A product TI ACX100B 0x8401 ACX100B product TI ACX111 0x9066 ACX111 @@ -2628,6 +2629,7 @@ product TI PCI1530 0xac57 PCI1530 CardBus product TI PCI1515 0xac58 PCI1515 CardBus product TI PCI2040 0xac60 PCI2040 DSP +product TI PCI7420 0xac8E PCI7420 CardBus /* TigerJet Network products */ product TIGERJET TIGER320 0x0001 PCI interface
UK Keymap issue
Hi, I have here two x86 machines set up with the uk keymap (console not X). holding shift and pressing three should send #. It sends # followed by a newline. why is this? Edd
Portuguese User Group Meeting
The OpenBSD .PT user group will be holding their fifth meeting open to all enthusiasts, newcomers and others. Pedro Martelletto, brazilian developer will give a talk about OpenBSD and joining us earlier before we leave to What The Hack, in the Netherlands. Past meetings haven't produced the amount of relevant work to the project as we would like but hey... we will eventually get there, some day. Besides that, we always have a lot of fun, technical discussions, good bandwidth, sell some CD's and stuff, etc. There will also be a special workshop on deploying honeypots by the Honeynet-PT team. This will be a two day event at the Laboratory for Advanced Computation of the University of Coimbra. Days 23th and 24th, July 2005. Free Entrance. Bring your computer and stuff. Cya there! http://www.openbsd-pt.org/eventos/coimbra05/ http://www.honeynet-pt.org/en/ -- nuno
OT: searching a openbsd friend
Hey guys, i apologize for this OT, but i am searching an OBSD friend i known in this list. If i am not wrong he was from Germany and his name is: Volker Kinderman. If you your vital signs are still pulsing, let me know Volker.
Re: Cross-Compiling OpenBSD
On July 10, 2005 1:56 am, Tom Cosgrove wrote: > >>> Maslan 10-Jul-05 08:16 >>> > > > > On 7/10/05, Maslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Pain let u learn more, besides i've some extra time. i used to make > > > my own LFS, and i missing this in BSD. > > > but what things i should consifer when trying so. > > > the compiler are almost the same gcc. > > "Almost the same"? > > Have a look at gcc-local(1)*. There are lots of differences between > stock gcc and what we use on OpenBSD. Several people have put a lot > of work in here. OpenBSD is an entire operating system, designed to > be built on OpenBSD - and not even cross-compiled on a different > processor architecture of the same operating system. Which would be all well and good if it wern't for the fact that under the projects goals it lists Provide a good cross compile/development platform. Which is probably a good reason why people, including my self once, have asked why cross compiling doesn't work on OpenBSD. > > You may get small bits compiled, but you will find it very difficult > to compile the whole system, and there will be subtle bugs that will > take hours to track down. > > > > and most of utils are so. > > > so where is the problem. > > "I have this engine - it came out of a Ferrari, so it's really good, > and I want to use it - and a Ford Escort that I am really enjoy driving, > even though it is 10 years old and the gears stick. How can I fit the > new engine into the Ford? It's just a car and an engine. Where is the > problem?" > > Tom > > * > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=gcc-local&apropos=0&sektion=0&; >manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
Re: No DMA? What's going on here?
Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 00:16 -0400, Nick Holland wrote: BTW: your 10G drive probably has a jumper to bring it below 8G or 2G, which is more than enough for a firewall, and will speed the boot. You will lose the rest of your disk, however. What's the advantage to this over simply configuring the BIOS to recognize the disk up to its limit? All the BIOS ever needs to see is the first 504M/2G/8G of the disk which is where the root filesystem is, right? And from what I have read, a root filesystem should almost never be larger than 504M anyway, right? Because some BIOSes are seriously damaged. I had an old P-90 that refused to even POST with anything larger than a 2G drive. Lying to get the system to POST, then putting your kernel within the BIOS' boot window will get you far enough to let the kernel take over, letting you use the full drive capacity (usually).
hw.setperf not available
Hello,
I have a little problem with hw.setperf. I installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my Thinkpad
x21. Everything works fine.
Except sysctl -w hw.setperf=*. I always get this message that
"sysctl: hw.setperf: value is not available" and I have no clue what to do.
Google doesn't help.
Some information could be usefull:
hw.model=Intel Pentium 3 ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
hw.machine=i386
The cpu is a Pentium 3 700Mhz with speedstep.
Hope anybody can help me.
Thanks in advanced.
bossk
Re: No DMA? What's going on here?
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 00:16 -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > BTW: your 10G drive probably has a jumper to bring it below 8G or 2G, > which is more than enough for a firewall, and will speed the boot. > You will lose the rest of your disk, however. What's the advantage to this over simply configuring the BIOS to recognize the disk up to its limit? All the BIOS ever needs to see is the first 504M/2G/8G of the disk which is where the root filesystem is, right? And from what I have read, a root filesystem should almost never be larger than 504M anyway, right? -- Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ports & ports tools
Back when Marc released the new ports system I saw a screenshot of some X11 tools, presumably his but I didn't pay much attention back then. I've not been able to find any reference (or the screenshots) now, does anyone know what/where these tools are or what happened to them?
Re: Cross-Compiling OpenBSD
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 10:54:45AM +0100, Tom Cosgrove wrote: > > BSD (whether OpenBSD or any other flavor) is not Linux or anything else > like that. It is a complete operating system, in use in production in > many places. > No need to go to Hurd. NetBSD is able to be built on a foreign operating system and/or can cross build to most of the architectures that NetBSD supports. -- Brett Lymn
Re: Cross-Compiling OpenBSD
>>> Maslan 10-Jul-05 09:50 >>> > > Thanks alot > for making it clear, gcc will be another problem. > but sometimes u really need to cross-compile os on another one as in > case of hurd. Sigh. The Hurd home page says "GNU/Hurd.. is completely self-contained (you can compile all parts of it using GNU itself)." It also says "It is not ready for production use". BSD (whether OpenBSD or any other flavor) is not Linux or anything else like that. It is a complete operating system, in use in production in many places. If you think that compiling bits of it on another operating system is dipping your toe in the water, so be it. You will miss out on the joy of using a proper UNIX. But beware: you will actually be dipping your toe in sulphuric acid, so enjoy the pain, and be aware that no-one will want to help afterwards (you have had lots of help so far: all those of us saying "don't do it". With reason.) No further comment Tom
SVG Puffy?
I was just wondering whether there has been any discussion of a SVG version of Cartoon Puffy and logo ( http://www.openbsd.org/art/puffy/puflogh200X50.gif ) . I only ask because sometimes it is nice to have project logos in a friendly scalable format (I know there is the PDF version but that isn't very friendly). The downside of this is that SVG is a scalable and easily editable format, so it is not inconceivable that someone could take Puffy and change the colours or use the SVG to create their own merchandise (because its scalable it will print well and look professional). Since Puffy is copyright and effectively an official badge this is an important issue. I did a quick Google for a definitive answer on a scalable version of Puffy but could not find one so either way this would be good for the archives. -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
Re: Cross-Compiling OpenBSD
Thanks alot for making it clear, gcc will be another problem. but sometimes u really need to cross-compile os on another one as in case of hurd. On 7/10/05, Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Maslan 10-Jul-05 08:16 >>> > > > > On 7/10/05, Maslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Pain let u learn more, besides i've some extra time. i used to make > > > my own LFS, and i missing this in BSD. > > > but what things i should consifer when trying so. > > > the compiler are almost the same gcc. > > "Almost the same"? > > Have a look at gcc-local(1)*. There are lots of differences between > stock gcc and what we use on OpenBSD. Several people have put a lot > of work in here. OpenBSD is an entire operating system, designed to > be built on OpenBSD - and not even cross-compiled on a different > processor architecture of the same operating system. > > You may get small bits compiled, but you will find it very difficult > to compile the whole system, and there will be subtle bugs that will > take hours to track down. > > > > and most of utils are so. > > > so where is the problem. > > "I have this engine - it came out of a Ferrari, so it's really good, > and I want to use it - and a Ford Escort that I am really enjoy driving, > even though it is 10 years old and the gears stick. How can I fit the > new engine into the Ford? It's just a car and an engine. Where is the > problem?" > > Tom > > * > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=gcc-local&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html > -- I'm Searching For Perfection, So Even If U Need Portability U've To Use Assembly ;-) http://www.maslanlab.org
Re: Cross-Compiling OpenBSD
>>> Maslan 10-Jul-05 08:16 >>> > > On 7/10/05, Maslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pain let u learn more, besides i've some extra time. i used to make > > my own LFS, and i missing this in BSD. > > but what things i should consifer when trying so. > > the compiler are almost the same gcc. "Almost the same"? Have a look at gcc-local(1)*. There are lots of differences between stock gcc and what we use on OpenBSD. Several people have put a lot of work in here. OpenBSD is an entire operating system, designed to be built on OpenBSD - and not even cross-compiled on a different processor architecture of the same operating system. You may get small bits compiled, but you will find it very difficult to compile the whole system, and there will be subtle bugs that will take hours to track down. > > and most of utils are so. > > so where is the problem. "I have this engine - it came out of a Ferrari, so it's really good, and I want to use it - and a Ford Escort that I am really enjoy driving, even though it is 10 years old and the gears stick. How can I fit the new engine into the Ford? It's just a car and an engine. Where is the problem?" Tom * http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=gcc-local&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
