On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, i am very confident with openbsd.
>
> Although i am very confident using the openbsd native support for my
> needs, all of them have some thing i dislike.
>
> First: i would really enjoy worst case O(log2 n), none of the method i
> kn
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> 2006/2/8, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> >
> > > i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
> > > motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
> > > http:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, chefren wrote:
SNIP
> Lets put in the OpenBSD plug first: Yes OpenBSD is fully supported with the
> FT-x
> card.
The Metanetworks 10G card is supported by an OpenBSD driver. The only
OpenBSD version directly supported is 3.7, it was the current version when
we purchased it.
S
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >[...]
> >/sys/sys/systm.h:170: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
> >`vsnprintf'
> >[...]
>
> Have you properly updated gcc?
>
> IIRC there have been quite some changes wrt types and in the
> instructions for build
Seriously, are you trolling intentionally? From what I can tell,
nobody else has reported anything similar to your "security holes" and
you have only presented symptoms without proof of a real exploit.
Perhaps you did get rooted, but as you appear to be the only one
experiencing it, without more
Message
Management and Decision Making
February 26-March 2,2006
Held at Sheraton Jumeira Beach - Dubai
INTRODUCTION
Credit Union of TexasCredit Union of Texas
Dear Credit Union Of Texas Client,
This is your official notification from Credit Union Of Texas that the
service(s) listed below
will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous
notifications have
been sent to the Billing Contact
Tonight, looking for info on cat food, I may have found a
cia front company(Just Kidding!!!). When I enter pet-grub.com in the
Konqueror location bar, Konqueror is redirected to
https://comm.cia.gov/cgi/comment_form.cgi before
the webpage for pet-grub.com is fully loaded. This
so far (6 times) is
Can anyone tell me how to install gforth on OpenBSD 3.8. I tried
./configure, make, make check at this is some of what I got:
cd engine && make gforth gforth-ditc gforth-fast gforth-itc
`gforth' is up to date.
`gforth-ditc' is up to date.
`gforth-fast' is up to date.
`gforth-itc' is up to date.
On 02/09/06 00:04, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:21:19 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
Can you do line rate 10G/OC192 with your card?
Last I heard only Endace could; and they're not supported.
the metanetworks 10G can
Since also "OC192"
I still haven't seen a DMESG for the IBM e326m SCSI version as well as
using the RAID 1. Can anyone confirm or deny if it is supported and
works well on the current version?
I know all issues known for the e326m SATA version are out of the way,
but I don't know yet about the SCSI version.
DM
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>
> >[...]
> >/sys/sys/systm.h:170: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
> >`vsnprintf'
> >[...]
>
> Have you properly updated gcc?
>
> IIRC there have been quite some changes wrt types and in the
> instructions for bu
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:34:02PM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, i am very confident with openbsd.
>
> Although i am very confident using the openbsd native support for my
> needs, all of them have some thing i dislike.
>
> First: i would really enjoy worst case O(log2 n), none
Don't get me wrong, i am very confident with openbsd.
Although i am very confident using the openbsd native support for my
needs, all of them have some thing i dislike.
First: i would really enjoy worst case O(log2 n), none of the method i
know so far make such garantee. Another problem is about
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
SNIP
> Hmm, no kidding. Do you know of anything that is rather lossless just for 1G
> networks (optical)? We may be throwing some taps out and the usually intel
> cards are very lossy.
Oops, I just re-read your original post. They have a new 1G card with
http://www
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:04:22 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
>
> > the metanetworks 10G can
>
> Hmm, no kidding. Do you know of anything that is rather lossless just for 1G
> networks (optical)? We may be throwing some taps out and the usually intel
> cards a
Linksyses are pretty bad,
some experiences I've had with them are:
1. pfctl -e will enable my firewall but the linksys'es freaks out and
drops the TCP (this does not happen when the boxes were connected with
cross-overs)
2. wireless ethernet bridge won't pass broadcast DCHP traffic
3. yet again
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:04:22 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
> the metanetworks 10G can
Hmm, no kidding. Do you know of anything that is rather lossless just for 1G
networks (optical)? We may be throwing some taps out and the usually intel
cards are very lossy.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:21:19 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
>
> > Can you do line rate 10G/OC192 with your card?
>
> Last I heard only Endace could; and they're not supported.
the metanetworks 10G can
Now I don't feel at all bad about not being able to run bsd.mp on my
clunky old dual-266 Dell PowerEdge 4200. Pah! Programmers nowadays, no
idea of commitment! ;)
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 22:36 -0600, Benjamin Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:51:31PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > digress
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:21:19 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
> Can you do line rate 10G/OC192 with your card?
Last I heard only Endace could; and they're not supported.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, chefren wrote:
> > and I know just the card to do it,
> > http://www.metanetworks.org/products.html
>
> No no no, those cards have not enough memory we
> manufacture one with up to 2x 256MB SDRAM with fully independent
> address and data busses:
>
> http://idd.nl/ft/pci.jpg
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:51:31PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> digressed a bit (I'm sure that surprises everyone here that I'd do
> that),
Shocked!
Anyway, to folks who are wondering about SMP, all you have to do is
notice how little traffic there is on smp@ and how (relatively) few
commits ther
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:47:15PM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> 2006/2/8, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> >
> > > i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
> > > motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something
On 2/8/06, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to know which would it be the best choice, and why?
> For instance, i don't know the best/average/worst case for the method
> supplied.
> I don't have a simple source of reference where i could see these
> metrics, prefereable on t
On 02/08/06 21:48, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:42:10AM -0800, Don Smith wrote:
> how could 1024 bits be used in blowfish only accepts
> 448 bit keys?
They can't be used - i was wrong, sorry.
--
| /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Goertz-Stra_e 71,
| \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Moenchengladbach, Ge
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:46:19PM +0100, Alexandre Anriot wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > sometimes when i type a key under x, it gets repeated and repeated and
> > so on. Sometimes i can stop this repeating by pressing the key again.
> > But then there will be another key that gets repeated in the next
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
> > On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
> >
> > > Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
> >
> > Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
> >
> > So the language
2006/2/8, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
>
> > i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
> > motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
> > http://user.it.uu.se/~arnea/abs/simp.html.
> >
> > I could not
how could 1024 bits be used in blowfish only accepts
448 bit keys?
--- Jonathan Glaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:38:56AM -0800, Don Smith
> wrote:
> > If I use a 50 character key for my SVND encrypted
> > filesystems, do all bits get used in the Blowfish
> key,
> >
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
> motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
> http://user.it.uu.se/~arnea/abs/simp.html.
>
> I could not figure what would it be the best/average/worst cost, i.e.,
>
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:35:30 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
> > On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
> >
> > > Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
> >
> > Of course, big gate array and stellar p
It's been a while since I've had the opportunity to code in RPG.
Implementing an SMP kernel in an old IBM report generating language is
an interesting challenge, and would open up the possibility of running
OpenBSD 4.0 on card-sorting machines.
i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
http://user.it.uu.se/~arnea/abs/simp.html.
I could not figure what would it be the best/average/worst cost, i.e.,
O(f(n)) for those method above.
Thanks a lot for yo
> On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
>
> > Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
>
> Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
>
> So the language should be VHDL!
>
> +++chefren
>
Just write the OS in SQL PL and move on! Geeeze ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
I've got an ADSL connection and for the past few months
have been working out an ALTQ (well pf.conf) config to
allow me to manage my upstream b/w. Sometimes the behaviour
I'm seeing doesn't jibe with how I'd expect it to work and
I'm wonde
On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
> On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
>
> > Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
>
> Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
>
> So the language should be VHDL!
Ugh! That's akin to using C++ and C# at t
On Wednesday, February 8, Jack Culpepper wrote:
>
> Encryption Key: 123456789012345678901234
> Authentication Key: 12345678901234567890
>
> So then on the OpenBSD end, those correspond to:
>
> Encryption Key: 3132333435363738393a3132333435363738393a31323334
> Authentication Key: 3132333435363738
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
So the language should be VHDL!
+++chefren
On 2/8/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Marcin Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why change that
> > It is apache, but with some pathes. But still iti s apache (changing
> > name may be bad for futurre coders, that wouldl ike to make somep
> > lugin for OpenBSD http serv
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 17:46:58 +0200, Kim Onnel proclaimed...
> I ran tcpdump and got the below:
>
> 19:29:58.871915 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c > ff02::1:ff00:10: icmp6: neighbor
> sol: who has a.dns.br
> 19:29:58.911884 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c > ff02::1:ff00:13: icmp6: neighbor
> sol: who has ns-
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:09:14 -0500, Jason Crawford proclaimed...
> I think the biggest argument for changing the web server is the fact
> that the Apache in tree doesn't do IPv6, and Apache 2.x does. And,
> btw, if you look at early 2.0 releases, you'll see they are still
> under the Apache 1.1
Thanks there, I'll consider using lighttpd then.
On 2/8/06, Bret Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Felipe Scarel wrote:
> > Well then, I'll take a look at you suggestion, Joachim, seems
> reasonable.
> > Too bad most developers actually *prefer* FTP over ssh, so it's going to
> be
> > difficu
Felipe Scarel wrote:
Well then, I'll take a look at you suggestion, Joachim, seems reasonable.
Too bad most developers actually *prefer* FTP over ssh, so it's going to be
difficult to convince them. Well, looks like I'll just have to implement...
they'll
get used to it anyway =)
Talking about th
Hi everybody,
The problem is not directly with obsd installed on scsi disk (fujitsu,
mas3735np, 73.4gb, 15,000rpm). Initially, the only system installed on it
was Win XP Pro, but it was infected and I installed obsd 3.6 over it, also
as a single OS on the whole disk, with the only purpose - to
Well then, I'll take a look at you suggestion, Joachim, seems reasonable.
Too bad most developers actually *prefer* FTP over ssh, so it's going to be
difficult to convince them. Well, looks like I'll just have to implement...
they'll
get used to it anyway =)
Talking about the Apache2 port, as soon
On 2/7/06, Marcin Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why change that
> It is apache, but with some pathes. But still iti s apache (changing
> name may be bad for futurre coders, that wouldl ike to make somep
> lugin for OpenBSD http server, & before they will start to make it,
> theyw ill have to le
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:05:44PM -0200, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> Since it's an open source project in which anyone can commit to the
> repository anytime, it's not possible to add each and every user as a
> system user. Instead, we're using Plone to write user information on
> the htaccess-style f
Hello,
On a PC running only SSH server to a very limited number of people, and only
ipv4
I ran tcpdump and got the below:
19:29:58.871915 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c > ff02::1:ff00:10: icmp6: neighbor
sol: who has a.dns.br
19:29:58.911884 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c > ff02::1:ff00:13: icmp6: neighbor
At 06:40 PM 2/7/06, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
> > > for threads.
> >
> > Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3
Hi,
I'm noticing quite a few sanity messages on the ports tree (notably sdl is
one of them) when running make on a Zaurus.
The messages pop up in the configure stage and state that the binary
produced is older than the distribution. Are we interested in these
messages? Seems like there will
Being a genuine novice wrt OpenBSD, I am not overly qualified to pass
judgement here. However, I read pretty much everything that is posted
to misc@ and have read every one of Dave's troll-like rants, for the
last couple of months. Sorry Dave, but from here you appear to be either
a troll, an M$ em
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 7 Joe S spake forth boldly:
Denny White wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today Stuart Henderson spake forth boldly:
On 2006/02/04 20:43, Denny White wrote:
hw.sensors.11=lm0, Temp3, temp, 127.50 degC / 261.50 degF
h
On 2/8/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cast a vote for re-writing the kernel in Ruby because of it's robust
> threads implementation.
No no no, OpenBSD should be rewritten with the new GPL v3 as soon
as it stabilizes. It seems much more robust than the previous releases,
and it i
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:01:38 -0800
Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Antonios Anastasiadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been wondering what are the openbsd team's long term-plans (if
> > any at all,of course) regarding future smp support.
> > I am aware that openbsd curre
> -Original Message-
> On Behalf Of Christopher Vance
>
> I have a network being installed with a pair of 3.8 firewalls running
> carp for failover. Temporarily, their external connection is via
> residential grade router and wireless ADSL modem, with the router
> doing pppoe. A real net
On 08/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > > > > i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
> > > has good s
The latest, which is, AFAIK, 2.58.
On 2/8/06, Jason Houx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Srebrenko,
>
> What firmware are you using on your controller?
>
> Jason
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
>
> > You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable
> > performance problems w
Srebrenko,
What firmware are you using on your controller?
Jason
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable
performance problems went away with some important patches since the
release.
I bet you'll see the load go away. And yes, as
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:28:07PM +0800, Dasn Clainst wrote:
>hi, have you guys met this problem? I use the recent code from CVS.
>Thanks.
>$ config -s /sys -b. GENERIC
>$ make depend
>[snip]
>...
>[...]
>/sys/sys/systm.h:170: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
>`vsnprintf'
hi, have you guys met this problem? I use the recent code from CVS.
Thanks.
$ config -s /sys -b. GENERIC
$ make depend
[snip]
...
depending the kern library objects
depending the compat library objects
sh /sys/kern/genassym.sh cc -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-unini
Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
> >
> > On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > > > i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
> > has good support
> > > > > for threads.
> > > >
> > > > Remember we opted for C+
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:33:19PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
>> for threads.
>Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3), but not until
>ddb has proper name demangling code.
*rolls eyes*
Yuck.
>Miod
K
I have a network being installed with a pair of 3.8 firewalls running
carp for failover. Temporarily, their external connection is via
residential grade router and wireless ADSL modem, with the router
doing pppoe. A real network is on order from the local monopoly ISP.
I'm happily using kernel
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:26:31PM -0200, Felipe Scarel wrote:
>However, the Subversion versioning control system (which my project uses)
>demands Apache2 in order to do DAV checkouts and commits, better
>authentication and more. So, my only choice was to manually install Apache2
>and compi
> Sure OpenBSD's modified Apache 1.3 is way more secure than most stuff
> out there, and is working great.
>
> However, the Subversion versioning control system (which my project
> uses) demands Apache2 in order to do DAV checkouts and commits, better
> authentication and more. So, my only choice
Hi All,
I've put in a few hours of effort, and I've been unable to get my Linksys
WAG54G DSL router/wireless/VPN thinger (running Linux & FreeS/WAN apparently)
to talk to my OpenBSD 3.5 system via IPSec. I've tried both automatic and
manual keying, to no avail.. I believe there are several models
68 matches
Mail list logo
