Re: ALTQ priq: bandwidth or no?

2006-05-13 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Melameth, Daniel D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/05/06 20:06]: : It would seem altq wants a bandwidth declaration. However, from man 5 : pf.conf: : : If bandwidth is not specified, the interface bandwidth is used. And OpenBSD complains bitterly when not defining the bandwidth on a pp

Re: hostapd small bug

2006-05-13 Thread Tony Abernethy
You log stuff in your time zone. I log stuff in my time zone. When your stuff and my stuff interact, that's a very confused log. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Bruno Carnazzi > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 11:56 AM > To: misc > Subject:

Re: ALTQ priq: bandwidth or no?

2006-05-13 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
Damian Gerow wrote: > Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/05/06 09:22]: > > On 5/11/06, Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not interested in bandwidth limitations, so it looks like > > > priq is likely my best bet. > > > > > Then I create a queue with a bandwidth limit of 7

Re: ALTQ priq: bandwidth or no?

2006-05-13 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/05/06 09:22]: : On 5/11/06, Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : >I'm not interested in bandwidth limitations, so it looks like priq is : >likely my best bet. : [...] : >Then I create a queue with a bandwidth limit of 700Kbps. : : >The man page i

MTU on DSL links (Was: Re: ALTQ priq: bandwidth or no?)

2006-05-13 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/05/06 10:17]: : On 5/11/06, jacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : >hi, that's part of your pf.conf : >---cut : ># normalize outbound packets to prevent mapping of LAN hosts : >scrub out on $ext_if all random-id min-ttl 250 : max-mss 1492 For the record, i

Confirmation From ATI Developer

2006-05-13 Thread autoreply
Dear Theo de Raadt and Richard Stallman, Thank you for visiting ATI.COM ! This is an AUTOMATIC RESPONSE which confirms that your request has been successfully received by our server and will be processed. Please do not reply to this message, any replies to this email will not be responded to or fo

Re: Does OpenBSD support Samsung s3c2410 cpu?

2006-05-13 Thread Dimitry Andric
Doug Brewer wrote: > I have one smdk2410 eval board. That board include Samsung S3C2410 > arm920t cpu. Since OpenBSD supports arm architecture, don't know > OpenBSD supports that board or not. If not, anyone considers porting > OpenBSD to smdk2410? I know this board quite intimately. :) However, i

Re: security bug in x86 hardware (thanks to X WIndows)

2006-05-13 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > Marc Aurele La France: Contrary to what too many security pundits think, > > limiting root's power doesn't solve anything. Like bugs, security issues > > will forever be uncovered, whether they be in setuid applications like an X > > server or in a kernel itself. The trick, it seems, is to

OpenBSD 3.9 current, AMD Geode SC1200UFH-266, kontron on a scandisk 128mb

2006-05-13 Thread Wild Karl-Heinz
hi. I'm working on a openbsd kernel and an image for an AMD Geode SC1200UHF-266. I got a cpu-module and the eval-board. The manufactor is kontor. I configured a kernel similar to my wrap-boxe and changed some entries for the network and console. The kernel will be loaded and after the loading h

systemtrash.com plans to review OpenBSD

2006-05-13 Thread Josh Grosse
And they are looking for input from the user community: http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=41225

Re: security bug in x86 hardware (thanks to X WIndows)

2006-05-13 Thread Nick Holland
Ed White wrote: It seems XFree people disagree... What a surprise. Marc Aurele La France: Contrary to what too many security pundits think, limiting root's power doesn't solve anything. Like bugs, security issues will forever be uncovered, whether they be in setuid applications like an X s

Re: Firefox keeps crashing

2006-05-13 Thread Nick Guenther
On 5/13/06, Jeffrey Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/13/06, Leonardo Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the way, I find it funny that firefox, being open-source and all > that, initializes slower on Unix machines than on WindowsXP for > example... > hey, it even has *different* menu

Re: PS/2 keyboard failing on generic MP-kernel (Dell PE2850)

2006-05-13 Thread Liviu Daia
On 11 May 2006, Anders Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:a [...] > For me, I get the same result with the MP-generic for both i386 and > amd64 with SC1425. Standard works fine, MP doesn't. > > Anyhoo, most of the times there won't be any keyboard attached to it, > so.. I'll just use the amd64 MP an

Re: Help Vampires: A Spotters Guide -- Why I Like OpenBSD and Its Community

2006-05-13 Thread Aaron Poffenberger
Interesting article but hardly applicable to most of the people I see posting to the @ lists. I don't believe in such entities but even were it the case energy vampires truly exist and in some natural or supernatural way suck the psychic force of others you'll note that they feed on the weak.

Re: hostapd small bug

2006-05-13 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:56:20PM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote: > Hi all, > > looking at /var/log/daemon, it seems that hostapd syslog timestamp > does not take care of local timezone : > thanks, just commited the fix using tzset() reyk > May 13 16:49:12 puffy test_syslog[6582]: This is just

Re: ksh and X windows.

2006-05-13 Thread Peter Fraser
My apologies, for not noticing that faq entry. But is is not a solution in general. I had a menu entry for "emacs", The effect I got was the shell inside emacs didn't have ENV set, and by that time ksh is not going to look at .profile. I tried to come up with a simple example of the problem. Why

Re: ksh and X windows.

2006-05-13 Thread Nick Holland
Peter Fraser wrote: If you install a new 3.9 system, and enable X windows (The only package I installed was emacs) Create a new userid with ksh as its shell and sign on though X. ~/.profile does not get executed Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a new xterm is created using the left click

Re: ksh and X windows.

2006-05-13 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Sat 2006.05.13 at 13:16 -0400, Peter Fraser wrote: > If you install a new 3.9 system, and enable X windows > (The only package I installed was emacs) > > Create a new userid with ksh as its shell > and sign on though X. > > ~/.profile does not get executed > > Nor does ~/.profile get executed

Re: ksh and X windows.

2006-05-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/05/13 13:16, Peter Fraser wrote: > Create a new userid with ksh as its shell > and sign on though X. > > ~/.profile does not get executed > > Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a > new xterm is created using the left click > menu in the background. that's normal; see xterm(1) about -l

Help Vampires: A Spotters Guide -- Why I Like OpenBSD and Its Community

2006-05-13 Thread Aaron Poffenberger
I found this practical blog entry by Amy Hoy on her blog, slash7.com .In the post Amy describes how to identify Help Vampires how to reform yourself if you are one, and how to quit enabling them if they show up in your community. She writes: "It's so regul

ksh and X windows.

2006-05-13 Thread Peter Fraser
If you install a new 3.9 system, and enable X windows (The only package I installed was emacs) Create a new userid with ksh as its shell and sign on though X. ~/.profile does not get executed Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a new xterm is created using the left click menu in the background

hostapd small bug

2006-05-13 Thread Bruno Carnazzi
Hi all, looking at /var/log/daemon, it seems that hostapd syslog timestamp does not take care of local timezone : May 13 16:49:12 puffy test_syslog[6582]: This is just a test for my c studies May 13 16:49:18 puffy hostapd[18915]: ural0: (rate: 100/8 sec) 00:0d:0b:c3:cb:bb > 00:0d:93:ed:ee:2b, b

Re: Firefox keeps crashing

2006-05-13 Thread Jeffrey Lim
On 5/13/06, Leonardo Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By the way, I find it funny that firefox, being open-source and all that, initializes slower on Unix machines than on WindowsXP for example... hey, it even has *different* menu option placements for unix and for windows! "Edit -> Prefe

Re: iwi driver (Problem with Intel 2200BG and PC-engines WRAP)

2006-05-13 Thread Risto Varanka
Problems with the 2200BG continue... I changed to OpenBSD 3.9. The interface looks like this on the box: # ifconfig iwi0 iwi0: flags=8803 mtu 1500 lladdr *** media: IEEE802.11 autoselect ibss (autoselect adhoc) status: no network ieee80211: nwid lala ch

Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?

2006-05-13 Thread Henning Brauer
* Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-13 05:17]: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > > * Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-13 03:00]: > > > Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier > > > this week? > > no. > Can

Re: security bug in x86 hardware (thanks to X WIndows)

2006-05-13 Thread Ed White
It seems XFree people disagree... Marc Aurele La France: Contrary to what too many security pundits think, limiting root's power doesn't solve anything. Like bugs, security issues will forever be uncovered, whether they be in setuid applications like an X server or in a kernel itself. The tri

Re: To forward, or not to forward

2006-05-13 Thread orlando
Dear Steve, At the moment, I have forwarding and pf turned off and allowing packets to flow freely until I can figure out the multiple subnet issue. The router that handles our subnets is outside of our network. Somehow the server cannot communicate freely when they have to

pf label issue

2006-05-13 Thread Thomas Börnert
Hi list, hy rules: pass in quick on $extif ... pass in quick on $extif ... pass out quick on $extif ... an so on about 100 rules the order of the rules is optimized the first rules are the rules with the most traffic now a want to do accouting with labels after this rules i place pass in qu

Re: PF references

2006-05-13 Thread Morten Liebach
On 2006-05-12 14:37:07 -0700, News Collector wrote: > Nick Holland wrote: > > Thanks Nick I should have said I checked all the "usual suspects". Sorry. > >News Collector wrote: > >>Hello: > >> > >>Where (what) is the canonical site (or book) for PF. > > > >documentation-wise? > Yeah > >that would

Raid 1 and 2 Disks: kernel panic with "init: not found" when reboot into broken mirror

2006-05-13 Thread ip
Hello misc, I spent two days to read man and how-tos, but today I don't succeed again to make raid 1 to work. I want to install openbsd 3.9 on two ide disks (wd0,wd1) of 10 gb with raidframe raid 1. Following the main steps that I have executed: 1. regular installation of openbsd 3.9 on wd0 2. co

Re: PF references

2006-05-13 Thread Bachman Kharazmi
you used the excellent tools as google and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com I guess... I made some searching for you, here you go http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114345514930017&w=2 http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/ http://www.unix-tutorials.com/go.php?id=280 /bkw On 12/05

Re: To forward, or not to forward

2006-05-13 Thread Steve Welham
> My goal with the bridge is to filter all traffic coming in from the > outside world, while allowing servers my servers behind the bridge > to connect freely even if their traffic has to travel out to the > router and back(keep state?). > > My point of confusion is whether or not to tur

Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?

2006-05-13 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 13/05/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-13 03:00]: > > Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier > > this week? > > no. Can I ask why

Re: Firefox keeps crashing

2006-05-13 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues
Just adding some more info to the topic... I've had some problems while running Firefox (tried on elightenment and fvwm) on OpenBSD 3.8-release and OpenBSD 3.9-snapshot from around february-2006. It was painfully slow, and switching between tabs was like watching a turtle trying to run. However,

Porting some IPTables conn_track extension to OpenBSD

2006-05-13 Thread Bruno Carnazzi
Hi all, Dispite this silly object, I'm interesting in porting some iptables conn_track listed here : http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-5.html. I'm mostly interested in the pptp conntrack, which I need for my nat-box. I'd like an advise : what's the most ap

Re: ugen.4 patch

2006-05-13 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:02:16PM +0930, Graham Gower wrote: > Here's another. > Is misc@ really the right place for silly patches like these? > you can post doc fixes to bugs@, or mail them directly to me. > > --- ugen.4.orig Sat May 13 16:57:59 2006 > +++ ugen.4 Sat May 13 16:58:23 20

ugen.4 patch

2006-05-13 Thread Graham Gower
Here's another. Is misc@ really the right place for silly patches like these? Graham --- ugen.4.orig Sat May 13 16:57:59 2006 +++ ugen.4 Sat May 13 16:58:23 2006 @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ .Fa interface_desc-*(GtbNumEndpoints . The .Fa config_index -should set to +should be set to .Dv USB_CURREN