On Friday 28 July 2006 21:49, Stuart Henderson wrote:
simple end-user install on the Windows side
I'd have to disagree with this. OpenVPN on Windows isn't nearly as end-user
friendly and easy to install as, say, TheGreenbow IPSec client.
you can bridge an ethernet to a remote Windows box
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 15:04, Andrew Pinski wrote:
I'm becoming slightly more cynical about testing any piece of C code with
optimization turned on in GCC.
And you think this will be different with anyother compiler, you have to
be joking.
-- Pinski
a GCC developer that actually tries
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:32:45PM -0300, Andr??s wrote:
We should convince both the Free Software Foundation and the Open
Source Initiative that Lucent Public License Version 1.02 is not a
free software license. Mainly based in Theo's arguments*.
This paragraph says it all:
And come on
Nick Holland wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Went back about two years in the MARC archives with the terms 'copy
drive' (oddly enough, 'dd' itself wouldn't work), and got plenty of
linux examples on Google (that pretty much say what I propose anyway)
but no luck... I'm hoping to find a faster way
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Jonathan Gray wrote:
SNIP
rx and tx are not yet working, if you want a USB device that can
act as an AP now look at the hardware list for ural(4) but be
careful as some vendors have replaced chips with the second
gen ones rum intends to support and not changed part number.
On 8/1/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but no luck... I'm hoping to find a faster way to create an image of one
drive (a Samsung MP0402H, 40G notebook, to be specific) onto an
identical drive than using:
Unless you are using this multiple times, I don't think there is
anything faster
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:01:40AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Jonathan Gray wrote:
SNIP
rx and tx are not yet working, if you want a USB device that can
act as an AP now look at the hardware list for ural(4) but be
careful as some vendors have replaced chips with the
On 2006/08/01 08:03, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Question was, is there a faster way? (about ten off-list replies so far
all point to 'no')
Depending on what's readily available to you, it might be worth
trying with a USB2-IDE adapter.
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an FTP
server for the research group I'm involved with. The problem is once
I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will be maintaining the
server. I've been considering using OpenBSD because it looks like it
can go far longer
Thee: In your experience, would it be possible for someone with no *NIX
Thee: experience to maintain a simple FTP server?
In my opinion, OpenBSD is the most logical and straight forward
UNIX-like operating system around. There isn't much in the way of
how-to's and tutorials, but it is straight
Titan wrote:
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an
FTP server for the research group I'm involved with. The problem is
once I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will be maintaining the
server. I've been considering using OpenBSD because it looks like it
can
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:26:23AM -0500, Titan wrote:
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an FTP
server for the research group I'm involved with. The problem is once
I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will be maintaining the
server. I've been considering
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:26:23AM -0500, Titan wrote:
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an
FTP server for the research group I'm involved with.
Do you need FTP? Can you use SFTP instead?
The problem is once I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will
be
On Aug 1, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Titan wrote:
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an FTP
server for the research group I'm involved with. The problem is once
I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will be maintaining the
server. I've been considering using OpenBSD
* Titan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an FTP
server for the research group I'm involved with. The problem is once
I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will be maintaining the
server. I've been considering using OpenBSD because
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Friday 28 July 2006 21:49, Stuart Henderson wrote:
simple end-user install on the Windows side
I'd have to disagree with this. OpenVPN on Windows isn't nearly as end-user
friendly and easy to install as, say, TheGreenbow
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:26:23AM -0500, Titan wrote:
I have quite a predicament. I have been tasked with setting up an FTP
server for the research group I'm involved with. The problem is once
I'm gone someone with no *NIX experience will be maintaining the
server. I've been considering
On 08/01/06 16:48, Anton Karpov wrote:
This world sucks. We're living in a dark ages, playing with the same
technologies as 20 years ago. UNIX is still here. Gcc is still here. C is
still here. And it will always be the same.
This world needs something really new. Maybe nuclear war is the
This is know. Workaround is to install via FTP (with pcibios disabled)
or use amd64 version. That, AFAIK, works fine.
More details at
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=x336
On 8/1/06, riwanlky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hai All,
I am
Hi,
What subversion ( GUI ) clients do you use on your OpenBSD systems?
Seems there is none on 3.9 ports and I will have to compile from source.
Will 4.0 have any subversio client in ports?
Thankyou so much
Kind Regards
Siju
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Can anyone recommend another 4 port 10/100 ethernet card that will
work well with OpenBSD 3.9?
I don't have any recommendations on 4 port cards. If you have a
switch that will support it, you should consider using VLANs with
Hi All,
I set up a GRE tunnel between two sites to have the
broadcast/multicast passing between the two but nothing is passing!
I'm not using for the moment any firewall and the configuration
straight forward as per man gre.
192.168.1.2/24
|
|
|
|--
192.168.1.1/24
Gateway A
Alex Berdan wrote:
Hi All,
I set up a GRE tunnel between two sites to have the
broadcast/multicast passing between the two but nothing is passing!
I'm not using for the moment any firewall and the configuration
straight forward as per man gre.
192.168.1.2/24
|
|
|
|--
On Aug 1, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Can anyone recommend another 4 port 10/100 ethernet card that
will work well with OpenBSD 3.9?
I don't have any recommendations on 4 port cards. If you have a
switch that will
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
What subversion ( GUI ) clients do you use on your OpenBSD systems?
Seems there is none on 3.9 ports and I will have to compile from source.
Will 4.0 have any subversio client in ports?
Subclipse (Java) was very recently committed and is a plugin for Eclipse,
and that
Yes, I fully agree with you but this is why I want to have GRE tunnel
in place. I want the broadcast/multicast to pass my gre0 tunnel and
reach from one side to the other.
I have even added the 224.0.0.0/4 with gateway 192.168.3.1 on Gateway
A and 224.0.0.0/24 with gateway 192.168.1.1 on gateway
Hi Jason,
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Can anyone recommend another 4 port 10/100 ethernet card that will
work well with OpenBSD 3.9?
I don't have any recommendations on 4 port cards. If
On Aug 1, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Thanks a lot for replying. I am new to ethernet redudancy (and carp
to boot) so I probably don't know what I'm talking about. We have a
rack of servers that are now for the most part fully redundant. You
can pull the plug on any box and nothing
Titan wrote:
[snip]
In your experience, would it be possible for someone with no *NIX
experience to maintain a simple FTP server?
That could work well if that person is willing to read documentation.
OpenBSD comes with very good documentation in the form of manual
pages and FAQ. Google is
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:37:31PM +0200, Alex Berdan wrote:
Hi All,
I set up a GRE tunnel between two sites to have the
broadcast/multicast passing between the two but nothing is passing!
I'm not using for the moment any firewall and the configuration
straight forward as per man gre.
Most likely it will work fine as a bridged network over the tunnel.
But in this can I still don't understand the purpose of the GRE!? I
though that is passing both the broadcasts/multicasts in order to run
for ex. EIGRP or OSPF in a mesh VPN environment.
On 8/1/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL
Hmm...is this why I can't get SMB workgroup browsing to work using IPSec?
Even if you have WINS server?
WINS is for name resolution, workgroup browsing is something different.
My point in here is to have a controlled multicast server over some
IPSec tunnels (8 end points are in the picture). As I was trying with
2 end-points I saw that nothing is passing through.
For the moment I'm having static routes and I want to switch over OSPF
on all locations but I need the
Original message
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:19:11 +0200
From: chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenBSD's own compiler
To: misc@openbsd.org
On 08/01/06 16:48, Anton Karpov wrote:
This world sucks. We're living in a dark ages, playing with the same
technologies as 20 years
On 2006/08/01 12:48, Tim Pushor wrote:
Can anyone recommend another 4 port 10/100 ethernet card that will work
well with OpenBSD 3.9?
Used you'll find dc(4) (if you have space for a long PCI card)
and hme(4), or there's em(4) gigabit. I suspect that onboard
bridges (as often[usually?] found on
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
Is my guess correct? If so, is it possible to have OpenBSD route
traffic both ways across the ethernet cable?
Thanks.
icmp's replies would go through loopback in such case.
If you wanted to force it to go over the cable, you could use route(8) to
manually set
Stuart Henderson wrote:
The vlan idea makes a fair bit of sense - carp(4) over vlan(4)
over trunk(4) over $some_nic(4) or some other mix - but if this
is used for security be aware that your switch then becomes a
security device. Google will find more information, including
Mitch Parker wrote:
Stuart,
I concur with that. $20 at newegg gets you one with a power supply for
the hard drive.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Stuart Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:10 AM
To: Chris Zakelj
On 2006/08/01 15:23, Tim Pushor wrote:
Thinking about it more, isn't it carp over trunk over vlan over nic?
The word trunk is overloaded.
trunk(4) [the (4) referring to a manual page from section 4]
is likely to be the meaning intended when the word `trunk' is used
on this list, which allows
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:01, Diana Eichert wrote:
I want to put a bi-quad at the focal point of an 18 parabolic dish at
either end.
If that combination is necessary a ralink radio is likely a poor choice.
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
The vlan idea makes a fair bit of sense - carp(4) over vlan(4)
over trunk(4) over $some_nic(4) or some other mix - but if this
is used for security be aware that your switch then becomes a
security
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Tim Pushor wrote:
I have two boxes, with 3 interfaces total each. One interface goes
to the other box for pfsync. That leaves 2 interfaces each. One
interface will go to Ethernet switch 1, and one will go to Ethernet
switch 2. Each interface will be split into 2
I found this great opportunity at Dice, and thought it might be helpful in your
job search.
http://seeker.dice.com/jobsearch/servlet/JobSearch?op=101dockey=xml/4/5/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]source=3
On 8/1/06, andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in need the ability to run a script when a cd is inserted. I am
not finding any way of getting notified when that happens, so I am
asking here. If not, I can just loop cdio info and check for a disk.
Is there something that will run a
Travers,
On 2006.08.01, at 11:23 AM, Travers Buda wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:10:23 -0400
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If all is
lost, you can wipe the disk with BCWipe (www.jetico.com) then test
again with Spinrite. This has recovered several disks for me.
Wipe it with dd
Hi Chris,
On 2006.08.01, at 2:00 PM, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Went back about two years in the MARC archives with the terms 'copy
drive' (oddly enough, 'dd' itself wouldn't work), and got plenty of
linux examples on Google (that pretty much say what I propose anyway)
but no luck... I'm hoping to
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:16:38 +1000
Shane J Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006.08.01, at 11:23 AM, Travers Buda wrote:
Wipe it with dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rwd0c count=10
You suggest only wiping the first 5k bytes of a drive?
Yes, I realize thats the wrong command now...
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
icmp's replies would go through loopback in such case.
Really? I got the impression from tcpdump that traffic from sk0 to sk1
(whether ICMP request or reply) always went over the ethernet cable
while traffic from sk1 to sk0 did
Greetings,
Please accept my apologies in advance for the off-topic post.
OpenBSD has satisfied all of my FOSS needs up to now, but
unfortunately I need to set up a workstation running both OpenOffice
and WINE, neither of which (from what I understand) have stable
OpenBSD ports.
Of the similar
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
icmp's replies would go through loopback in such case.
Really? I got the impression from tcpdump that traffic from sk0 to sk1
(whether ICMP request or reply) always went over the ethernet cable
while
50 matches
Mail list logo
