William Graeber wrote:
I have just installed OpenBSD 3.9 on a net4511. My root partition is
read-only, and I have a tarball unzipped into an mfs partition for /var upon
boot. /dev/ttyp00-01 and /dev/ptyp00-01 are symlinked to /var/dev so that
they are r/w. At the login prompt over the serial
On 9/27/06, Peter Hessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its been pointed out to me that zyd(4) was disabled for release. Not to
mention, it currently doesn't work.
When the driver is enabled, the above device will attach as zyd(4).
:-(
: Welcome to the club. The F5D7050 has several
On 2006/09/27 00:29, William Graeber wrote:
I don't understand why cu under OpenBSD would work while minicom
or hyperterminal wouldn't under the same circumstances.
flow control settings, perhaps?
On 9/27/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;)
Sorry ok the problem it is this someone told my boss that the email
messages has been readed by someone else this information came from our
isp we have a e1 connection its like a t1 connection so with that
information they said that the
Hi all,
I bumped on your that emial on the list
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-06/1679.html about
testing the bandwidth between obsd obsd , obsd linux and thorugh
router linux bsd linux boxes. Im using dell 1425SC boxes witch 1GB
em0 nics and my machine with openbsd
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:12:12AM +0100, jacek wrote:
Hi all,
I bumped on your that emial on the list
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-06/1679.html about
testing the bandwidth between obsd obsd , obsd linux and thorugh
router linux bsd linux boxes. Im using dell
You should have a look at net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen. Also look at
net.inet.ip.ifq.drops if it goes up or not. Tuning the ifq size is black
magic because to large queues reduce the performance and may case high
delays. Something around 100-300 is enough for a router.
i give it a try
Have you
that was it , ifq.drop number was high 7 sth, i increased ifx.maxlen to
300, and now im getting 25Mbytes/s ~ 200 Mbitsto obsd box using scp, still
seems to be a bit slow 5 times less then ( 1Gb links) but it's better then
it was :) . Thanks again for a tip.
--
Jacek
On 9/27/06, jacek [EMAIL
jacek wrote:
that was it , ifq.drop number was high 7 sth, i increased ifx.maxlen to
300, and now im getting 25Mbytes/s ~ 200 Mbitsto obsd box using scp, still
seems to be a bit slow 5 times less then ( 1Gb links) but it's better then
it was :) . Thanks again for a tip.
Be aware that scp
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:12:30PM +0100, jacek wrote:
snip
I remeber that ipref2 has issues on OpenBSD because of the way they use
threads. Not sure if it got fixed
maybe but even if i upload file form linux to obsd box it very slow
10Mb , window is 32k then.( checked by
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:58:34PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote:
On 9/19/06, Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i recently enabled support for some newer wireless chipsets from
atheros, like the AR2413, AR5413, and AR5424 single chip solutions.
please also test it if you have an
By the way, if anyone has spare USB Zydas hardware, it would be nice to get
more of it spread around amongst our developers. Mail me back, but do tell
me where you are located too... thanks.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Francois Visconte wrote:
Hello,
Is there standard way to build python2.{3,4} package with debugging
symbols ?
cd /usr/ports/lang/python/2.3 env DEBUG=-g make install
or put DEBUG=-g in /etc/mk.conf re ad mk.conf(5) for more details
--
Mathieu
Hello,
I noticed that when booting a Sun Fire V20z with a recent 4.0 snapshot,
the kernel hangs for about 17 seconds right after ipmi0 at mainbus0.
The box boots successfully, and impi seems to be working fine.
Not sure if the delay is normal or not; just wanted to report it. This
happens with
Delay is normal. The communication with the BMC is quite slow and during the
first boot it goes out and talks to all devices so it'll incur maximum penalty
time wise. Subsequent reads and writes to the BMC are faster. Since this only
happens upon boot I don't think it is that important. I did
i've got an older model sonicwall firewall (pro 200) and am wondering if i can
get openbsd onto it. the processor is listed as 233 MHz StrongARM 233 RISC,
but is not listed on the supported machines for the armish platform.
feel free to suggest other OSes (offlist, plz!) that will run on this
Hi all!
I am trying to install Spamassaassin from the ports tree on an OpenBSD
3.9 system.
I have removed /usr/ports an downloaded a fresh copy starting from scratch.
I did one prior run with make which of course gave the same result.
I get the fallowing: *Error in package*:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Hans Almqvist wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to install Spamassaassin from the ports tree on an OpenBSD 3.9
system.
I have removed /usr/ports an downloaded a fresh copy starting from scratch.
I did one prior run with make which of course gave the same result.
I get
Sounds like the behavior you are looking for is route reflection.
Eric
Tom Beard wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
i honestly don't understand your problem ;(
I get told that a lot ;)
Our two border routers (I'll call them B1 B2) both have full views
made up of various transit
Woodchuck skrev:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Hans Almqvist wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to install Spamassaassin from the ports tree on an OpenBSD 3.9
system.
I have removed /usr/ports an downloaded a fresh copy starting from scratch.
I did one prior run with make which of course gave the same
yes i tried, but it doesn't work, you need an ip adress on sis0
Thomas
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 22:23 +0200, Johan wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to put an OpenBSD server (3.9 with all patches) between an
ADSL modem and a commercial firewall.
Using transparent bridge and PF, is it possible to
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;)
Sorry ok the problem it is this someone told my boss that the email
messages has been readed by someone else this information came from our
isp we have a e1 connection its like a t1 connection so with that
information they said that the
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Johan wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to put an OpenBSD server (3.9 with all patches)
between an ADSL modem and a commercial firewall.
Using transparent bridge and PF, is it possible to redirect all SSH
traffic arriving at sis0 to 127.0.0.1 on the OpenBSD server and
How about adding a third nic to both the openbsd and firewall,
give them their own private network addresses, then redirect
the ssh traffic from firewall to openbsd over this new network
forgive my poor attempts at modifying your drawing ;-)
--
John Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Any help,
I am considernig deploying either an ipsec or openvpn box using the
upcming openbsd 4.0 for my company. Since there are large number of
users I am looking at some hardware crypto accelerators that will
work with openbsd 4.0.
when I search archives I did not find a lot of info on what cards
Following OpenBSD's automatic generation of ssh and isakmp keys,
prehaps the following would be a worthwhile addition to /etc/rc to
generate a key/config for rndc/named.
==
if [ ! -f /etc/rndc.conf ]; then
echo -n
On 9/27/06, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think about it. How would sshd communicate with you without an IP
address? Seems to defy the laws of TCP/IP.
I'd concede that its more akin to bending than defying laws (RFCs).
with enough will and some legwork you might be able to get
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Following OpenBSD's automatic generation of ssh and isakmp
keys, prehaps the following would be a worthwhile addition to
/etc/rc to generate a key/config for rndc/named.
/etc/rc already handles that during named startup.
DS
Just in case you haven't seen it yet.
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20060927091645
Daniel Hartmei posted a great article at undeadly.org and announce more
to come!
I very much enjoy the reading a LOTS!
Try all the example he showed as well just to see how good or bad my
Hello,
I've been looking att the default redirection rule (from spamd(8)) for
greylisting with spamd and pf. It looks like this:
table spamd persist
table spamd-white persist
rdr pass inet proto tcp from spamd to any port smtp - 127.0.0.1 port
spamd
rdr pass inet proto tcp from !spamd-white to
On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Rickard Borgmdster wrote:
What I see as the problem here, is that the blacklisting occurs
before
the whitelisting. So that, when a large block such as 31.32.33.0/24 is
in spamd and I wish to whitelist 31.32.33.188, that whitelist entry
will have no effect.
I'm not sure though... doesn't he want what the external peers sent to
his border routers, not just what the border routers decided were the
best routes?
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
32 matches
Mail list logo
