On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:04:57 +0100
noob lenoobie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm unable to send mail from php
i think that's because you don't have smtp access in a chrooted
environment, but you can get around that with pearmail.
we installed pearmail and used a function like:
function
this laptop has not a rs232 so I give you the called functions command
written down on a piece of paper :-(
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG APIC BOOT SSDT SSDT
1b7a Calles \_SB_.PCI0._INI
panic: aml_die aml_setvalue: 1481
Stopped at Debugger+0x4: leave
ddbtrace
aml_setvalue(...
noob lenoobie wrote:
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from php.
Problem is with the Apache chroot. I've used http://phpmailer.sourceforge.net/
successfully.
-ME
What about using some stuff that we have in the ports
system? Like mini_sendmail?
On (12/01/07 03:28), Mike Erdely wrote:
noob lenoobie wrote:
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from php.
Problem is with the Apache chroot. I've used
http://phpmailer.sourceforge.net/
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Ryan Corder wrote:
However, the 4.0 ftp-proxy and the 3.8 ftp-proxy don't seem to like
working with each other. When I attempt to ftp from the inside network
all the way out to the internet, I can get connected, but if I attempt
to do a transfer I receive a 'connection
Hi,
Once we had a lot of trouble with checkpoint too.
While to one company ( also using a chekpoint ) every thing works fine, a vpn
to a other company using checkpoint gave a lot trouble.
we used rather standard 3des-md5 to both directions.
One problem was located on the checkpoint side -
* Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 08:20]:
On Friday 12 January 2007 13:04, noob lenoobie wrote:
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from php.
the php mail() function will not work in chroot (unless you install the
chroot
flavour of the mini-sendmail package).
I try to use HFSC on a gateway to queue packets.
SSH packets never go to the right queue, always in the default queue.
I test with this little pf.conf on a single interface machine and face the
same problem. http packets go to the right queue ssh always to the default
queue !! Any idea ?
Thanks
Good morning-
Some free time and inspiration last night got me to hack together
a shell script for trunk(4) startup. This morning, I realized that
I need to have a better understanding of how people use trunk to
make it usable by and for the masses.
So, if some of the good people of [EMAIL
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:30:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 08:20]:
On Friday 12 January 2007 13:04, noob lenoobie wrote:
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from php.
the php mail() function will not work in chroot
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:23:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to use HFSC on a gateway to queue packets.
SSH packets never go to the right queue, always in the default queue.
I test with this little pf.conf on a single interface machine and face the
same problem. http packets go
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 15:50]:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:30:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 08:20]:
On Friday 12 January 2007 13:04, noob lenoobie wrote:
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from
Hi,
I try many many many many many way of making a xorg.conf working with dual
head. My problem is not the dual head setup, it's just when i try to surf on
firefox or when i launch rdesktop all the computer hang if i am on a dual
head xorg.conf. I can open thunderbird, the gimp, xmms, bluefish,
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, noob lenoobie wrote:
Dear list,
I'm a happy openbsd user since 3.7. It always served me well. But now for
the first time, I'm stuck.
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from php.
Surely you've heard of chroot?
I try with this pf.conf and the ssh interactive packets still go to the
ExtInAck queue but the bulk ssh packets go to the right queue (sshbulkext)
I can't figure out why...
ext_if=xl0
scrub in log all
altq on $ext_if hfsc bandwidth 2000Kb queue { default-Ext-In, sshExtInObsd,
httpExtInObsd,
On 1/12/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 15:50]:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:30:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 08:20]:
On Friday 12 January 2007 13:04, noob lenoobie wrote:
My
Hi,
I think it would be awesome, if it was possible to buy an OpenBSD mug
from the online ordering system at www.openbsd.org. I would definitely
buy one together with the 4.1 cd-set.
I imagine the mug with Cartoon Puffy on the one side and the OpenBSD
logo on the other side (see
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Daniel Ouellet
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 5:54 PM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
your job(s) offer instead of your jobs@, etc if you think it is that
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Martin Toft wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be awesome, if it was possible to buy an OpenBSD mug
from the online ordering system at www.openbsd.org. I would definitely
buy one together with the 4.1 cd-set.
I imagine the mug with Cartoon Puffy on the one side and the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Theo de Raadt
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:48 PM
To: Christopher Snell
Cc: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
And if anyone wanted my opinion, I am fine with
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:45:37AM -0500, Umnada Tyrolla wrote:
your job(s) offer instead of your jobs@, etc if you think it is that
badly needed...
http://openbsdsupport.org/jobs/
An admin interface will be added to post your jobs. For now
send it in
if you have any and I
Umnada Tyrolla wrote:
I don't think that really helped the problem any. How are the
headhunters going to know about it?
That's better then complaining and doing nothing and was an answer to
the request for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, as describe on the site Please only send OpenBSD specific
I'm testing ssh coming from outside right now.
With a ssh session I get all the packets going to ExtInAck
pf.conf
ext_if=xl0
scrub in log all
altq on $ext_if hfsc bandwidth 2000Kb queue { default-Ext-In, sshExtInObsd,
httpExtInObsd, ExtInAck }
queue default-Ext-In bandwidth 20% hfsc(red
* Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 17:40]:
Just out of interest does femail need a sh in the chroot like mini_sendmail?
a shell? femail itself, no.
but some things may invoke it using sh -c.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
For all those interested, here goes the dmesg of OpenBSD 4.0 running on a
Asus M2NPV-VM board with AMD64 X2 4200+ EE and 1GB DDR2 667MHz.
SATA and Network OK.
Only problem is with X, mouse not working.
Just installed it though, so haven't tweaked anything.
BTW, put the BIOS PlugPlay OS in NO,
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Wow, nobody ever thought of that before You could at leats have
searcghed the archives to see if your idea is new.
That was over three years ago, surely there's nothing wrong with
bringing an old idea back up for reconsideration?
Personally I think that a mug would be
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 05:19:47PM +, Tom Beard wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Wow, nobody ever thought of that before You could at leats have
searcghed the archives to see if your idea is new.
That was over three years ago, surely there's nothing wrong with
bringing an old idea back
Looks like 3.9 and 4.0 are both missing the new DST rules -
src/share/zoneinfo/datfiles/northamerica was patched on Oct 29.
Should this be an errata?
-N
On 2007/01/12 17:19, Tom Beard wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Wow, nobody ever thought of that before You could at leats have
searcghed the archives to see if your idea is new.
That was over three years ago, surely there's nothing wrong with
bringing an old idea back up for
On 1/12/07, Tom Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Wow, nobody ever thought of that before You could at leats have
searcghed the archives to see if your idea is new.
That was over three years ago, surely there's nothing wrong with
bringing an old idea back up for
(the message I sent you was offlist, it's usual to reply to offlist
email privately)
On 2007/01/12 18:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a ssh session I get all the packets going to ExtInAck
If I place your exact ruleset in pf.conf, adjust for my sk(4) rather
than your xl(4), reload PF and
If the project ever does market a mug, maybe it could say-
OpenBSD. Free, Functional Secure on one side and
RTFM on the other.
Lol,
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:59:23PM +, Ste Jones wrote:
On 1/12/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 15:50]:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:30:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-12 08:20]:
On
Wow, now that's an idea-- I'd happily drink Blanche de Chambly from an
OBSD pint glass any day.
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Greg Thomas
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:21 PM
Hi,
A new version of flashboot is ready and we need people to betatest
before we put it up.
The release are locate here http://tilde.se/flashboot/download/4.0/
Please report all successfully and unsuccessful results to me!!
.bsd are kernels ready to be uploaded to your existing flashboot
I'll do it. I'll order some and announce here. I'll set up a ebay
store for the merchandise. contact me with requests.
Robert Nagy wrote:
On (12/01/07 03:28), Mike Erdely wrote:
noob lenoobie wrote:
My problem is the following : I'm unable to send mail from php.
Problem is with the Apache chroot. I've used
http://phpmailer.sourceforge.net/ successfully.
What about using some stuff that we have in the ports
Now I remember why I chose to go with something else!
Original Message
Subject: Re: php mail() function fails
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:59:23 +
From: Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Just out of interest does femail need a sh in the chroot like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greets
I have been trying numerous configs trying to out smart
the inability of VOIP to transfer to UDP encapsulated RTP.
A very common problem as anyone who deals with NAT and VOIP knows.
The outside G729 enabled phone connects nicely to the VOIP
Wow, am I surprised! On my little Zaurus handheld, I am regererating the
entire system. The first 3 steps, for me, were doing the kernel, then a
build of src, and then a build of XF4 ... so why am I boring you with this?
Just because I am so surprised that building XF4 seems to take (so far)
On Friday 12 January 2007 11:12, Samurai Chef wrote:
I'll do it. I'll order some and announce here. I'll set up a ebay
store for the merchandise. contact me with requests.
http://www.discountmugs.com/libbey-beer-mug-glass-l24.htm
Use the free Satin Etch (see bottom)
Wire Frame Puffy on the
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/01/10 15:55, Chuck Robey wrote:
Look, as far as emergencies go, I have the orignal Linux OS sitting in
back as a emergency,
boot bsd.rd
then you can do an upgrade install.
I could reinstall everything, or maybe just my /etc/ but could anyone
I am interested in buying some.
Good ideia.
On 1/12/07, Samurai Chef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll do it. I'll order some and announce here. I'll set up a ebay
store for the merchandise. contact me with requests.
We're trying to see if we can resurrect an old application that used to run
on SCO. I tried to run one of the programs on an old 3.3 machine, and it
seemed to be binary compatible, but the config differences (e.g. terminfo)
will have to be worked out somehow.
Don't suppose anyone has ever
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 05:16:30PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
Just because I am so surprised that building XF4 seems to take (so far)
longer than even a build of src, which is certanly not what I expected.
The build of src took about 24 hours, but XF4 has now been whacking for
more than 30
list,
when any configure script is checking for standard header files
(stdlib.h, memory.h) it hangs for a few seconds on each file, as if it
is taking this long to actually find each file on the disk. which i
guess is actually happening. making the script take about almost five
minutes to
I tried to install OBSD 4.0 and it freezed during the boot with this
error:
nvram: invalid checksum
What does this mean?
Peter
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:30:06 -0700, Bob DeBolt wrote:
snipped to essential statement
If anyone reading this understands the VOIP / NAT issue, preferably via
experience, and has an answer to what is involved making VOIP work
through a pf enabled OpenBSD 4.0 stable firewall, Could you please lend
yeah because the guy who wrote the mail() function in php thought it would be
easier to call popen() and save the command line parsing than parsing it then
calling an exec*() function.
isn't that the recomended method in C too? I have no authority in
this but my ancient C CGI book does it that
Bob DeBolt wrote:
[ Note your PGP armor was broken in the previous message, please check
and fix if possible, it could be of course that the mailinglist peeped
it up somewhere. Best solution: don't use inline PGP signing, but use
the MIME variant, which is available in enigmail, eg I use it :) ]
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:53:34AM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
isn't that the recomended method in C too? I have no authority in
this but my ancient C CGI book does it that way too IIRC.
Maybe for when you're using a fixed string, but when you want to pass
user input as an argument to a
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:53:34AM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
yeah because the guy who wrote the mail() function in php thought it
would be
easier to call popen() and save the command line parsing than parsing it
then
calling an exec*() function.
isn't that the recomended method in C
In this kind of discussion, it is pretty safe to assume that the VOIP PABX
used is an asterisk running either SIP/IAX2/H323/RTP protocols. Googling
will provide us with the corresponding range of ports in each of them
either in UDP or in TCP.
Now, it is easy to get this working. In the IP phones,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Demuel I. Bendano, R.E.E wrote:
The major easy here is on how the voice traffic from OBSD-VPN-A to
OBSD-VPN-B and vice versa encrypted. That is, an encryption of the voice
traffic as full-duplex.
Thanks for your response, unfortunately the
On 2007/01/13 07:06, Demuel I. Bendano, R.E.E wrote:
In this kind of discussion, it is pretty safe to assume that the VOIP PABX
used is an asterisk running either SIP/IAX2/H323/RTP protocols.
It isn't really safe to assume that. There's a lot of software,
some commercial some free. A lot of
Bob DeBolt wrote:
I have been trying numerous configs trying to out smart
the inability of VOIP to transfer to UDP encapsulated RTP.
A very common problem as anyone who deals with NAT and VOIP knows.
Hmm. Maybe not.
I use VOIP behind NAT (Sipura and Grandstream phones talking to an
Hi List,
i want to compile a new kernel f|r a sparc64 target on a i386 machine.
Is this possible to build any code/packages for other platforms
on a e.x. i386 machine ?
How can i do that ?
Thx
Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/12/07 4:03 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Bob DeBolt wrote:
I have been trying numerous configs trying to out smart
the inability of VOIP to transfer to UDP encapsulated RTP.
A very common problem as anyone who deals with NAT and VOIP knows.
I am trying to shut down my laptop using the voltage sensors.
Unfortunatly I can't test this with a generic kernel because all my
sensors on my only -current box come from the ACPI subsystem.
The problem is, the limits don't seems to work:
$ sysctl hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
i want to compile a new kernel f|r a sparc64 target on a i386 machine.
Is this possible to build any code/packages for other platforms
on a e.x. i386 machine ?
How can i do that ?
Thx
Thomas
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#ProbXComp :
Tiago Marques wrote:
For all those interested, here goes the dmesg of OpenBSD 4.0 running on a
Asus M2NPV-VM board with AMD64 X2 4200+ EE and 1GB DDR2 667MHz.
SATA and Network OK.
Only problem is with X, mouse not working.
Just installed it though, so haven't tweaked anything.
BTW, put
On Thu 2006.12.28 at 13:26 -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 09:42:45AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Btw. I'm rebooting with the SD card inserted perhaps that does the trick.
Hm, I think I'm having the same experience then.
If I reboot(1) and have a (512MB) SD card
On 1/12/07, Okan Demirmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that i started playing with seal (thanks marc), i'm finding i have
the same issue with my x40 as well - in the past, i just kept the sd
card inserted at all times - i don't yet have a compelling reason to
remove/insert it myself yet.
63 matches
Mail list logo
