In epistula a Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] die horaque Sun,
11 Feb 2007 21:08:08 -0200:
Dear gentelmen/madams,
i would like to thank you all for you suggestion. They were to the
point. Now, one doubt raised up in regards to man 4 pppoe and the
link suggested below.
In theory, what
On 2/12/07, Artyom Goryainov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from {!$me, !$mynet} to $ext_if port 80
You will probably want to see the PF FAQ [1] on this, specifically the
section on Lists and Macros. It tells you why you should use tables
for this purpose. The
block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from {!$me, !$mynet} to $ext_if port
80
read also
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html
another way to deal with negative in your pf.conf
is to use tables... maybe try a table with safeip combinations
like, but do test and read and try variations, this
Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
You could always try using vmxnet/vic.
Using the Intel 'em' driver is also an option.
ethernet0.virtualDev = vmxnet
ethernet0.virtualDev = e1000
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
---
Institute of Neuroinformatics
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:12:25AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
Markus Ritzer wrote:
I would like to write a framebuffer driver for OpenBSD (for the MS Xbox
platform).
Where can I find documentation about writing OpenBSD drivers in general or
especially for framebuffers?
There is a list
Hi
I'm trying to run an experiment (initially) with regards bonding/
trunking ethernet ports under OpenBSD (current) .. but I'm hitting a
snag and I haven't been able to google my way out of it as yet ...
I have 2 x Broadcom NICS set at 10mbit full duplex (for the purposes
of the test ..
On 2007/02/12 12:44, Jon Morby wrote:
My problem is that graphs of the 2 cisco ports show traffic is only
going via the 1 port and not being balanced across both ports as I
would have expected.
loadbalance hashes the header to determine which link to use; you might
want round-robin
On 12 Feb 2007, at 13:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/02/12 12:44, Jon Morby wrote:
My problem is that graphs of the 2 cisco ports show traffic is only
going via the 1 port and not being balanced across both ports as I
would have expected.
loadbalance hashes the header to determine which
I'm with one few dificults for configure altq+pf+hfsc,
Need balancear traffic of the output and input,
See my script:
#Default configuration
##
set limit { states 4, frags 2, src-nodes 35000 }
set block-policy return
set loginterface fxp0
set
Anyone,
I have one OpenBGP machine running OpenBGPd that is currently connected to the
Internet running
OpenBGPd. Furthermore, it has two NIC interfaces. The external NIC is
designated as xl0(3com)
whereas the internal NIC is rl0(rtlink). From the internal NIC, I connected it
to another
Actually .. maybe I'm expecting too much from this ...
With 1 of the ports disabled, and roundrobin specified - transfer
speeds dropped from 1.2MB/s to about 780KB/s
Certainly at GigE speeds the graphs look a little more as I would
expect, so it could also be an artefact of testing at
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:30:18PM +, Jon Morby wrote:
On 12 Feb 2007, at 13:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/02/12 12:44, Jon Morby wrote:
My problem is that graphs of the 2 cisco ports show traffic is only
going via the 1 port and not being balanced across both ports as I
would
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:09:27PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:30:18PM +, Jon Morby wrote:
On 12 Feb 2007, at 13:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/02/12 12:44, Jon Morby wrote:
My problem is that graphs of the 2 cisco ports show traffic is only
going via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a icrit :
Anyone,
I have one OpenBGP machine running OpenBGPd that is currently connected to the
Internet running
OpenBGPd. Furthermore, it has two NIC interfaces. The external NIC is
designated as xl0(3com)
whereas the internal NIC is rl0(rtlink). From the internal NIC, I
in /etc/sysctl.conf, the net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 and in /etc/resolv.conf i
added a valid public
ip address as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a icrit :
Anyone,
I have one OpenBGP machine running OpenBGPd that is currently connected to
the Internet running
OpenBGPd. Furthermore, it has two NIC
These are my configurations:
OpenBSD With Internet And OpenBGP Running
-
external ip xl0(internet): some-public-ip
internal ip rl0: 192.168.111.254/30
$ sudo bgpctl -n show summary
Neighbor ASMsgRcvdMsgSentOutQ Up/Down
Hi all,
im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d4 )
but the i get the following error:
# /usr/local/libexec/slapd -d 4
@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd
Hello
How do I figure out if my kernel was compiled with COMPAT_LINUX option or not?
I didn't compile it. I put COMPAT_LINUX openbsd kernel into google but didn't
find anything useful in the first several pages.
I have 4.0 on i386 installed from a CD it must be running the default kernel.
CL
On 2/12/07, Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:12:25AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
There is a list of books that help at http://www.openbsd.org/books.html.
I found The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating System
helpful.
Then a close look at the
OpenBSD With Internet And OpenBGP Running
Does this one announce a default route into bgp to the other machine?
('announce default-route')
OpenBSD machine that established BGP session to the gateway
Does this one accept a default route announced by the other machine?
(comment out 'deny from
On Monday 12 February 2007 09:27, Antonis Faragitakis wrote:
Hi all,
im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d4 )
but the i get the following
How do I figure out if my kernel was compiled with COMPAT_LINUX
option or not?
I didn't compile it. I put COMPAT_LINUX openbsd kernel into google
but didn't
find anything useful in the first several pages.
``sysctl kern.emul'' will list the available emulations.
I have 4.0 on i386
On 2/12/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
How do I figure out if my kernel was compiled with COMPAT_LINUX option or not?
I didn't compile it. I put COMPAT_LINUX openbsd kernel into google but didn't
find anything useful in the first several pages.
I have 4.0 on i386 installed
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Hello
How do I figure out if my kernel was compiled with COMPAT_LINUX option or not?
I didn't compile it. I put COMPAT_LINUX openbsd kernel into google but
didn't
find anything useful in the first several pages.
I have 4.0 on i386 installed
On 12 Feb 2007, at 14:31, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Roundrobin may increase packet reordering which in turn reduces the
tcp
window size because tcp thinks it is a network congestion. In the
worst
case one connection may run slower over two link trunk than over a
single
link. You need a real
Where should I suppose to declare announce default-route? And I commented all
entries in the
# filter out prefixes longer than 24 or shorter than 8 bits
# do not accept a default route
# filter bogus networks
In the internal OpenBSD machine, I did invoke:
$ sudo bgpctl sh next
Nexthop
Hello
OpenBSD 4.0, i386, trying to copy from a 2007 Gentoo Linux.
I made sure there is kern.emul.linux=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf and the machine is
rebooted. Then I installed the Redhat package. Then I wanted to make the yes
program work. I copied all the libraries from the Linux to /emul/linux/...:
Sorry for the message without body, im a little sleepy and hitted the
wrong button... :p
Ok,
I had this problem last night on one of our shiny Dell PowerEdge 2950s
with RAID 10 and SAS disks.
For no reason it started screaming sd0: not queued: error 5 on the
console, the server didnt crash (no
Hi
Now I tried to make yes work without the redhat base. I uninstalled
redhat_base, partial-redhat_base and partial-partial-redhat_base (??).
Then ldd yes on the Linux system shows these libraries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd `which yes`
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 =
Quoting Nick ! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/12/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
How do I figure out if my kernel was compiled with COMPAT_LINUX option or
not?
I didn't compile it. I put COMPAT_LINUX openbsd kernel into google but
didn't
find anything useful in the first
I have never seen this but I am very interested in this particular
instance. Apparently there is an issue with read ahead on mfi that I
have never seen before on OpenBSD but other OS' have run into.
Is this reproducible? If so can you try to disable read ahead in
CTRL-R (bios)?
Thanks,
/marco
On 2007/02/12 16:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where should I suppose to declare announce default-route?
In the neighbour or group definition, see bgpd.conf(5).
I was planning on running bonnie tonight (This is a production server)
to get some IO and see if i can reproduce the problem.
We have 3 of this servers with OBSD 4.0 stable and the same RAID card
running for about 2 months now, this is the first problem we
encounter. If you have any idea of how
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:23:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Hello
How do I figure out if my kernel was compiled with COMPAT_LINUX option or
not?
I didn't compile it. I put COMPAT_LINUX openbsd kernel into google but
--- Quoting Mike Erdely on 2007/02/11 at 02:46 -0500:
I was going through the FAQ testing my CARP set up and tried ifconfig
carp1 down. The backup promoted itself to master ONLY for carp1 even
though I have net.inet.carp.preempt=1.
But, ifconfig em1 down DOES cause the backup firewall to
Have the file systems from one OS version to the next always been
compatible? Will they continue to be?
My concern is that a 3+ year old dump may not restore correctly on
current version of OBSD. Can I be assured that I can store data reliably
for 3 - 5 years on a FFS?
-pachl
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:04:36PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Hi
Now I tried to make yes work without the redhat base. I uninstalled
redhat_base, partial-redhat_base and partial-partial-redhat_base (??).
Then ldd yes on the Linux system shows these libraries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd
Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have a brand new Dell Poweredge 850 with two 160 G SAS disks attached
to a Perc 5IR controller card.
In the BIOS, I have configured them as an IM (Integrated Mirror) Logical
Volume. I have synchronized the mirror, and the array is activated.
I have played
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Clint Pachl wrote:
Have the file systems from one OS version to the next always been compatible?
Will they continue to be?
My concern is that a 3+ year old dump may not restore correctly on current
version of OBSD. Can I be assured that I can store data reliably for 3 -
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:04:36PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
16287 yes CALL #243 (unimplemented linux_sys_set_thread_area)()
16287 yes PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL code 0
16287 yes NAMI yes.core
What does this mean? That linux_sys_set_thread_area is unimplemented in the
On 12/02/07, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Clint Pachl wrote:
Have the file systems from one OS version to the next always been
compatible?
Will they continue to be?
My concern is that a 3+ year old dump may not restore correctly on
current
version of
Nick Holland wrote:
Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have a brand new Dell Poweredge 850 with two 160 G SAS disks attached
to a Perc 5IR controller card.
In the BIOS, I have configured them as an IM (Integrated Mirror) Logical
Volume. I have synchronized the mirror, and the array is
On 12/02/07, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My data will be movies and music so I should be fine. Thanks Jeff.
Jeff Rollin wrote:
Then, of course, there's the contents of the backup to consider. You
(probably) don't want your Brand New OBSD 4 installation replaced with an
install
On 2/12/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but don't waste your time trying with recent linux binaries/libraries -
you need to modify/recompile the kernel in for that -
and even then, no NPTL, etc.
NPTL == ?
threads
Hello list.
This is my first post here and also first contact with OpenBSD.
I have a question about CARP.
I'm engaged a project about redundancy and load balancing between
3 different internet links.They asked me to search for a robust
open source solution that can do the job and I came to
test
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:07 -0200, Paulo Roberto Candido dos Santos
wrote:
CARP can do that? If not, is there any other robust open source product
that can do the job?
I think for outgoing traffic PF could balance between the three links
(see route-to in the docs), but for incoming traffic load
Thanks for the quick reply!
Sorry, I forgot to tell that the priority is outgoing traffic and no
need for loadbalancing incoming connections. I'll read the
route-to section.
On 2/12/07, Paulo Roberto Candido dos Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply!
Sorry, I forgot to
hmm, on Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:40:52PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
the cylinders, heads, sectors and the number of total sectors do not match.
what does this mean?
It means translation is stupid, but we keep doing it. :)
ok, now just to make things more interesting, i have found a disk
Hi All
Hate to ask something that might be a simple answer but I am trying to find
how it is best / easiest to get the CPU usage of a BSD 4.0 box.
I only need the result and not a bunch of other data as I want to store the
result in a mysql db.
Basically i'm just looking for either the idle
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:10:52PM -0400, James Mackinnon wrote:
Hi All
Hate to ask something that might be a simple answer but I am trying to find
how it is best / easiest to get the CPU usage of a BSD 4.0 box.
I only need the result and not a bunch of other data as I want to store the
I honestly have no clue. I have banged on my mfis as much as I could
and have never seen anything like this. I am doing some investigation
into this. If you find a way to repro this let me know please.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:12:56PM -0500, Alejandro Lozanoff wrote:
I was planning on
frantisek holop writes:
so what's up with these dick measurements?
I think you got that part just right :-)
Expecthing cyl * head * sec/cyl to come up with the number of actual
sectors on the disk is your problem. Modern disk don't have a fixed
number of sec/track. They use Zone Bit
James Mackinnon wrote:
Hi All
Hate to ask something that might be a simple answer but I am trying to find
how it is best / easiest to get the CPU usage of a BSD 4.0 box.
I only need the result and not a bunch of other data as I want to store the
result in a mysql db.
Basically i'm just
On 2/12/07, Nick ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell me, it's a joke when it says use electron microscope at
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/opencon06-drivers/mgp00020.html right?
xray machines can help too.
56 matches
Mail list logo
