On Thursday 15 May 2008, Steve B wrote:
> pass out on $ext_if inet proto tcp from $ext_if to any flags S/SA
> keep state queue ( general, tcp_ack )
last matching rule ?
--
Chris
My employer has allowed me to work from home one day per week. As part of
the agreement I had to take home a VoIP phone that connects me to work. This
seemed like a good excuse to setup AltQ on my OBSD box. I read the man page,
the FAQ and Jacek Artymiak's book. I built the queues and loaded the ne
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 07:43:25PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:22:11PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On 5/14/08, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On May 14, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > > > Are you sure that's a decent analysis? If you hav
On 5/14/08, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. Lots of those keys out there already. So is something like
> ssh-vulnkey the right approach? I do have a couple of users on one of my
> boxes. Mind, they're all good OpenBSD people and I really hope their
> keys didn't come from a de
2008/5/14 scott learmonth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Lord Sporkton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> I am trying to set up a ipsec link between my home network(private ip
>>> network behind dynamic public ip)
>>> and my colo server(single public static ip). I was a b
I don't think that is it, but I will try, thank you.
I'm pretty sure the label that OpenBSD and/or Ubuntu left me with
is a Solaris type.
And dumb me, I didn't consider OBP as helping the install too.
So the questions remain if I can install OBP without Solaris, and if I'll have
to crack open the c
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:22:11PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 5/14/08, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On May 14, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > > Are you sure that's a decent analysis? If you have a non-debian system
> > > with the full number of keys available, what a
On 5/14/08, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 14, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > Are you sure that's a decent analysis? If you have a non-debian system
> > with the full number of keys available, what are the chances that you've
> > landed on one of the 32767 keys? Not v
Anthony Roberts wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 1:27 am, Christer Solskogen wrote:
Just to be 100% sure. Do you see libc.so.43.0 in /usr/dest/usr/lib ?
I've come across the problem you got just a week ago, and my mistake was
wrong tag, but the problem could be that you try to build 4.3 on a
4.3-cu
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 05:30:18PM -0700, Ben Calvert wrote:
> On May 14, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
>
> >On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 01:45:51AM +0200, raven wrote:
> >>
> >>A decent analysis can be found here... just to understand what can
> >>do a
> >>comment /* */ :)
> >>http://blo
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Lord Sporkton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I am trying to set up a ipsec link between my home network(private ip
>> network behind dynamic public ip)
>> and my colo server(single public static ip). I was a bit unclear on
>> how to set up a tunnel between a s
2008/5/13 Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Lord Sporkton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am trying to set up a ipsec link between my home network(private ip
>> network behind dynamic public ip)
>> and my colo server(single public static ip). I was a bit unclear on
> apt-get upgrade left Linux failing to boot.
> Solaris 9 install fails very early, something about newfs failing.
> I really tried a bunch of manual parameters, besides that it
> is run automatically.I think 10 is in the mail. (I have 10 on
> DVD but so far only a CD drive on the machine).
if you
On May 14, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 01:45:51AM +0200, raven wrote:
A decent analysis can be found here... just to understand what can
do a
comment /* */ :)
http://blog.drinsama.de/erich/en/linux/2008051401-consequences-of-sslssh-weakness.html
Are y
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 01:45:51AM +0200, raven wrote:
> Ted Unangst ha scritto:
>> On 5/14/08, Gabriel Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Just wondering... If someone generates ssh keys with flags J or Z
>>> set in malloc.conf(5), aren't these keys useless too (since feeding
>>> predict
Ted Unangst ha scritto:
On 5/14/08, Gabriel Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wondering... If someone generates ssh keys with flags J or Z
set in malloc.conf(5), aren't these keys useless too (since feeding
predictable data is more or less equal to not feeding data at all) ?
A dec
On 5/14/08, arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason we need to rebuild userland/packages after upgrade base is that
> the
> API may change, right?
The only reason you "need" to rebuild is to get the new versions. The
old ones work just fine.
> However, if we make the new api always bac
I was referring to this section that I now quote:
"Final steps
Whether you upgrade by using an install kernel and doing a
formal "upgrade" process, or do a "in-place" binary upgrade,
there are certain manual steps that have to be performed."
If we look further and
My OBP is definitely out of date, but I haven't yet been able to fix that.
I'm not sure if it requires installing Solaris (which file systems can OB
access?), which I've been unable to do, and I'm not sure if it requires
cracking open the machine, which I am reluctant to do, but might do.
Someone
On 2008-05-14, Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> default:\
>> :np:im=\r\n%s/%m (%h) (%t)\r\n\r\n:sp#1200:cl=\E[H\E[2J:
>>
> But the FAQ says to put the "cl=\E[H\E[2J" in the "P|Pc|Pc" entry.
> Does this really belong in default?
Not entirely, as the escape sequence is terminal-typ
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:34:24AM -0700, D. Adam Karim wrote:
> By chance did you read this:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade43.html#etcUpgrade
>
Of course.
> If you just blindly did a `tar xzf -C / etc43.tgz` without following
> instructions, then it surely would have overwritten what yo
Hello everybody,
This is a question specialy to people in germany.
I would like to know if somebody uses BASE or any familiar fix price data
flat from any provider and uses his mobile phone to get internet.
I'm interested into provider details (does it work, are there issues or
connection aborts
By chance did you read this:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade43.html#etcUpgrade
If you just blindly did a `tar xzf -C / etc43.tgz` without following
instructions, then it surely would have overwritten what you had added
to the file.
Also note, /etc/gettytab is the file which handles this. Here
Greetings:
Following the procedure in FAQ 7.3. I had set up /etc/gettytab to
clear the screen after logoff. After upgrading to 4.3, this no longer
works. The Upgrade Guide mentions that /etc/ttys has changed; could
this have had an impact on this? I would like to get this working
again, so advice
I am new to OpenBSD and I believe there are some reason for that since all the
smartest gurus made the decision and went that way:
The reason we need to rebuild userland/packages after upgrade base is that the
API may change, right? However, if we make the new api always backward
compatible (and o
> Edd, although no developer I am interested in assisting.
> Personally, following the six month -stable cycle fits my
> needs better than following -current. I have used the diffs
> at http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/ as a resource for creating
> -stable packages and I now see UNSUPPORTED 4.3 packages
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edd
> Barrett
> Subject: Re: security fixes for packages
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The developers don't care about your security.
>
> I'm so s
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The developers don't care about your security.
No, the developers are all very busy and don't have time to work on
stable packages.
I'm so sick of hearing about this that I am willing to co-ordinate a
group of developers to
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:47:38AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:48:41AM +0200, chefren wrote:
>
> > On 5/13/08 7:08 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >
> >> More details show that someone seriously fucked up in debian.
> >
> > Well, this Kurt has seriously asked for details on th
On 5/14/08, Gabriel Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering... If someone generates ssh keys with flags J or Z
> set in malloc.conf(5), aren't these keys useless too (since feeding
> predictable data is more or less equal to not feeding data at all) ?
feeding predictable data + unpred
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:14:59 -0500
> Sean Malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:37:38AM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> > > I guess everyone by now has heard about the very serious libssl
> > > vulnerabili
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Comhte wrote:
Ok, so does it mean that -stable or -release are useless ??? and
people buy useless CDs every 6 monthes ? I can't believe it.
I really don't understand why these fixes are not provided anymore.
Then do something about it and start contributing too. May be y
I gets a little more interesting..Linux/sparc was working fine for a few
days.Now it seems, merely plugging this machine into the network makes
thenetwork barely work -- very slow, connections dropped. Even ifI'm just
sitting in various installers. Plugging in the wired on board ethernet.
apt-get u
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:14:59 -0500
Sean Malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:37:38AM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> > I guess everyone by now has heard about the very serious libssl
> > vulnerability on Debian/Ubuntu?
> >
> > Just making sure that the source is safe, thank
On Wed, May 14 2008 at 24:09, David Gwynne wrote:
> i believe this has been fixed with revision 1.80 of src/sys/dev/ic/mfi.c.
> could you please try -current (or at least 4.3) and see if the problem
> persists?
OK. I'll try to upgrade these servers asap. (It's have to be done anyway =))
Claer
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser en
suivant ce lien.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Bonjour,
Obligatoire ` partir du 1er juillet 2008, le kit de sicuriti comprenant
un triangle de pri-signalisation
et un gilet ritro-riflichissant ` bord de tous les vihic
I have observed the same problem with lii(4) not linking up running
the latest i386 snapshot, and using a 10 meter patch cable to the
switch. However, when trying a short 1 m cable to the same switch port
the link comes up!
A fresh kernel build this past weekend from CVS exhibits the same behaviour
So i make a proposal to avoid "clueless guy" like me to ask this
question which seems to cause so many troubles:
What do you think about posting a message on this page:
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
which could say in a better english as mine :) :
"OpenBSD -stable packages are not mainta
38 matches
Mail list logo
