OpenNTPD configuration?

I'm a bit confused by what I am seeing in the logfiles when compared to the information found in the manpages and FAQ. I would appreciate if someone could provide some perspective. I've set up OpenNTPD on a 4.3-current server (192.168.0.4), and the time has finally reached synchronization as b

Bluetooth keyboard on -current

Hi misc@, An Apple wireless keyboard has come into my possession, and i'm trying to get it working on -current. I rebuilt the kernel/userland based on cvs update on Friday with all the bluetooth devices enabled. I also installed bluetooth-tools and bluetooth-libs ports. Initially my bt dongle

Intel D201GLY2 and OpenBSD 4.3

Hi, After upgrade to OpenBSD 4.3 from 4.2 my Intel D201GLY2 based gateway go to reboot on kernel initializing. Intel D201GLY2 bios was upgrated to latest but problem was not fixed. Any ideas? -- Sergey Aikinkulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-si

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 07:39:34PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > A final word. > > > > For all you backseat drivers: this is OpenBSD. > > > > Those who do the work get to call the shots. > > In reading the thread, I don't get the impression that anyone is > second-guessing just that people thou

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:06:59AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:55:48PM -0500, Adam Patterson wrote: > > Paul de Weerd wrote: > >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +, hyjial wrote: >> > >> Anyway, perl is distributed under the artistic license, yet the > >> pkg-to

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 07:39:34PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > A final word. > > For all you backseat drivers: this is OpenBSD. > > Those who do the work get to call the shots. In reading the thread, I don't get the impression that anyone is second-guessing just that people thought it an interest

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:40:05PM -0400, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote: > On 23/05/08 04:21 PM, Han Boetes wrote: > >Yes but C is written in gcc which is GNU licensed and pkg_utils > >are written in perl which is a much more libaral language. I > >really start wondering why the whole of OpenBSD is not rew

Re: E450 stuff

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:36:13AM -0400, bofh wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > But man, E450s are big. But I'm sure you have noticed that. :) > > > With lots of "NON-LOAD-BEARING" stickers all over the power supply handles. > As a friend

Re: Realtek 8185 wireless card

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:33:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I saw on OpenBSD site that Realtek 8185 pci/cardbus chips are supported > as of OBSD 3.8. where did you see that? > Just bought an airlink101 card but get 'not configured' in dmesg. Which > driver is supposed to support 8185 chips

Realtek 8185 wireless card

I saw on OpenBSD site that Realtek 8185 pci/cardbus chips are supported as of OBSD 3.8. Just bought an airlink101 card but get 'not configured' in dmesg. Which driver is supposed to support 8185 chips? I couldn't find any other references to these chips. It was a very cheap card for my dad who will

Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?]

* Martin Marcher wrote: > Hello, > > How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting > and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I > think that the license under which python is distributed is quite > similiar to a BSD license. Especiall this: do you

Re: E450 stuff

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Steve Shockley < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bofh wrote: > >> every box under 400Mhz, with >> one exception, my Apple ][gs. >> > > Man, what speed was that IIgs? I had put an accelerator in the box, so it's a speedy 7Mhz, as opposed to the standard 2.8Mhz or the

Re: Ethernet card or PCI Express x8 slot

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:40:10PM -0700, David Newman wrote: > Any recommendations for an Ethernet card that fits into a PCI Express x8 > slot? I didn't see anything specific on the hardware page or in the > archives. > > This is for a Dell CR100 OEM server. The spec sheet mentions the usual >

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

A final word. For all you backseat drivers: this is OpenBSD. Those who do the work get to call the shots. I did get permission from my fellow developers to switch our pkg_* to perl once I made a strong enough argument. A huge part of the argument was the actual code. I did write tools that work

Re: how to fire up an intel wireless card ipw0 on lenovo thinkpad x31?

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:51:13PM +0200, elflord woods wrote: > hi all > my tp x31 is well supported by the beloved openbsd according to > http://www.openbsd.org/i386-laptop.html > and in my dmesg i see that my card is recognized > but the light indicator for wireless connection can not be turned

Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?]

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:23:23PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote: > Hello, > > How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting > and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I > think that the license under which python is distributed is quite > similiar to

how to fire up an intel wireless card ipw0 on lenovo thinkpad x31?

hi all my tp x31 is well supported by the beloved openbsd according to http://www.openbsd.org/i386-laptop.html and in my dmesg i see that my card is recognized but the light indicator for wireless connection can not be turned on I've tried dhclient ipw0 no luck neither do i need some kind of firmw

Re: is it possible to install matlab2008 on openbsd ?

Floor Terra wrote: On Sat, 24 May 2008, elflord woods wrote: hi all: i've installed the fedora_base and turned on linux emulation in the sysclt.conf and i've mounted my matlab disk but when i run install i get: Sorry ! We could not determine the machine architecture for your host You may b

Re: [OT] Python License

> "Martin" == Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting Martin> and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I Martin> think that the license under which python is distributed is quite Martin> s

Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?]

Martin Marcher wrote: License is here: http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.5/license/ http://www.python.org/download/releases//license/ Yeah, that's exactly like the BSD license, elegant and simple.

[OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?]

Hello, How about the python license? Not that I'm really capable of rewriting and/or patching the pkg_* tools but from a license point of view I think that the license under which python is distributed is quite similiar to a BSD license. Especiall this: """ GPL-compatible doesn't mean that we're

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

> "comfooc" == comfooc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: comfooc> Sorry, but I've clearly misphrased my question and might be a little comfooc> offtopic. I should ask if python has better license than perl from comfooc> OpenBSD perspective. If you're serious, the answer is no. They're roughly equ

Re: E450 stuff

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But man, E450s are big. But I'm sure you have noticed that. :) With lots of "NON-LOAD-BEARING" stickers all over the power supply handles. As a friend of a friend found out. When I moved last year, I tossed it out. 1KW

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

Sorry, but I've clearly misphrased my question and might be a little offtopic. I should ask if python has better license than perl from OpenBSD perspective. Once again sorry. Cheers.

Re: SPARC64-V support

here Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 's prtconf -pv infomation. http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/systems/prtconf/2541.txt Sun's Sparc Server's information site is the http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/sol/systems/views/sun_systems_sparc.page1.html yet, couldn't find a PRIMEPOWER machines prtco

Re: is it possible to install matlab2008 on openbsd ?

On Sat, 24 May 2008, elflord woods wrote: hi all: i've installed the fedora_base and turned on linux emulation in the sysclt.conf and i've mounted my matlab disk but when i run install i get: Sorry ! We could not determine the machine architecture for your host You may be attempting to inst

SPARC64-V support

As of yesterday, OpenBSD/sparc64 has full support for Fujitsu's SPARC64-V processor. As far as I know OpenBSD is the first free operating system that supports this processor. These processors are found in Fujitsu's PRIMEPOWER machines. The work was done on a PRIMEPOWER 250, so that model is know

is it possible to install matlab2008 on openbsd ?

hi all: i've installed the fedora_base and turned on linux emulation in the sysclt.conf and i've mounted my matlab disk but when i run install i get: Sorry ! We could not determine the machine architecture for your host You may be attempting to install on an unsupported OS Is there anythi

Re: E450 stuff

Johan SANCHEZ wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 2008 11:08:32 -0400 > Christopher Sean Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On May 23, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I inherited an E450 from my old job. It booted Solaris just fine but >> > I was never able to ge

OpenBSD and "VIA VT6105M RhineIII"

hello, we have huge problems with the new soekris and pcengines boards vith the "VIA VT6105M RhineIII" network chipset and OpenBSD. no machine is able to establish a tunnel to another IPsec peer. we worked for years with the pcengines WRAP boards - the had no problem. below is a trace of the tun

intermediate email host setup help

Hi, I would like some help to setup an environment which could be used in most xDSL clients. These clients normally host their real DNS and email at some place like dreamhost. I would like to bring via pop3 these emails (for each user) and then do some filtering (spam, virus, etc.) and host them l

Re: [OT] developers running -current on laptops

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris wrote: >> >> I can see from the recent undeadly posts and pictures that most >> developers are using laptops and I know you have to run -current to do >> development work. I was just wondering if these laptops are

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

2008/5/24 comfooc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > What about python? I think that it's license is better (but i might be wrong). What about reading the entire thread? -- "We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching them

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

comfooc ha scritto: Hi, What about python? I think that it's license is better (but i might be wrong). Cheers. Please... Read all threads before writing Developers make choices... Marc choice perl stop. Perl is in base and he know perl, so for a silly sillogism, Marc use perl for pkg_

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

Hi, What about python? I think that it's license is better (but i might be wrong). Cheers.

Re: Issues with OpenBSD 3.7 and ftp-proxy

On 2008-05-24, Eric LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # uname -aOpenBSD boo.org 3.7 GENERIC#50 i386== ftp-proxy is dealt with in the faq, but you need an old version for your outdated OS version: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/www/faq/pf/ftp.html?rev=1.18&content-

Re: Issues with OpenBSD 3.7 and ftp-proxy

Eric LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # uname -aOpenBSD boo.org 3.7 GENERIC#50 i386== I would not be surprised if you're the only one left out there running that particular version. If you upgrade to something more recent, ie OpenBSD 4.3, you will get a lot more useful responses

Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:20:50PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > perl offers faster software development. perl is not fast. Just > saying. Althought, I think that's what you meant too. > > # sysctl hw.model hw.physmem > hw.model=SUNW,SPARCclassic, TMS390S10 @ 50 MHz, on-chip FPU > hw.physmem=24