Marc Espie [Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:30:28PM +0200] wrote:
It's because of gitk which is a repository browser (or so
http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html tells me). Annoying that there's no
git-no_x11 but them's the breaks.
Makes no sense. It's clearly a multi-package situation, not flavor.
hello,
I've a question (maybe a stupid one). I have a problem with a box so I'm start
searching the reason of this problem. By reading the code I'm wondering what
are the circumstances under which the code panics in pool_do_get (different
sentinel values...) specifically in
#ifdef DIAGNOSTIC
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:27:38AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-07-14, GVG GVG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any more idea on this subject? Something I should check that I missed? Your
help is much appreciated
I would go through starttls(8) again from scratch, it does work.
Maybe I
Claer wrote, sometime around 15/07/08 07:31:
On Mon, Jul 14 2008 at 28:15, Mart?n Coco wrote:
Thanks!
Have you tried the quad nics on those Dells? We do have a couple of R200s,
860s and 850s running with 2 dual port cards no problem, but we have never
tried the quad ports.
Hello,
I do
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 07:34:37PM -0700, my mail wrote:
--- On Tue, 7/15/08, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnome-display-properties for OpenBSD ?
hi,
yep, correct. please see
A web-site glitch: The paper
Neils Provos
Encrypting Virtual Memory
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/swapencrypt.ps
is missing from the OpenBSD related pre3sentations papers index page
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/index.html
ciao,
--
-- Jonathan Thornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t =
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:10:54 +0200
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-03 15:18]:
* Daniel Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-25 06:39]:
The mechanism you seek is the route-to and reply-to.
using a seperate routing table (route -T 1 add
It happens when some memory was freed to the pool and then modified after
it was freed.
//art
banana split [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hello,
I've a question (maybe a stupid one). I have a problem with a box so I'm start
searching the reason of this problem. By reading the code I'm wondering
Sean Malloy wrote:
Hello,
Maybe NetFlow. Checkout the pfflowd and flowd packages.
I seem to recall it being said that the recent change if the pfsync
protocols (which pfflowd uses as its datasource) means that since 4.3
(possibly 4.2, I forget when the pfsync stuff went in) pfflowd doesn't
sorry if I'm wrong but pool cache has gone so man pages needs to be updated
Index: pool.9
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/pool.9,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -p -u -r1.36 pool.9
--- pool.9 26 Jun 2008 05:42:08 -
Dear all,
i have small ups seri APC / Back-UPS ES 525 , how to joint and control
with openbsd , i try using apc-upsd when test not working.
then i try nut but unknown driver.
if any sucsess story can share to me :)
--
sonjaya
http://sicute.blogspot.com
Hello
Iv've the following problem in PF with NAT / Filtering, OpenBSD 4.4
(-current):
pf nat rule:
nat log on bge0 inet from 172.16.12.128/27 tag natted - 88.82.xx.xx
pf filter rule:
pass log quick all flags S/SA keep state tagged natted
the packed is dropped by my default deny rule (the rule
Hello
I want to use relayd on OpenBSD 4.3 Release (i386). I've the problem,
that relayd exits as soon as all checked hosts are down. The problem was
described by this post: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/142876
So I tested relayd in openbsd -current (4.4 beta i think) and it works
MY APOLOGIES --- getting cross-eyed in my old age.
On 7/16/08, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
anip
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
I most certainly did not write
-Original Message-
From: Jim Razmus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:58 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0
I would like it to automatically ping Adobe looking for the Flash
player
that is not available. When I'm particularly
Ted Unangst wrote:
anip
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
The parallel argument is that if any GUI tool has a command line
helper function, then that package is broken.
(Microsoft Windows still has a
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 7/15/08, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm sending an email to misc when a package depends on
X that should
**NOT** depend on X. That's what's broken, obviously, if
you're saying I
should be
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 7/15/08, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm sending an email to misc when a package depends on X that should
**NOT** depend on X. That's what's broken, obviously, if you're saying I
should be installing X on a production server. NOT.
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Marco Fretz wrote:
pf nat rule:
nat log on bge0 inet from 172.16.12.128/27 tag natted - 88.82.xx.xx
pf filter rule:
pass log quick all flags S/SA keep state tagged natted
FWIW, you no longer need to specify flags S/SA keep state as it is the
default.
It does work
On 2008-07-16, Dave Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean Malloy wrote:
Hello,
Maybe NetFlow. Checkout the pfflowd and flowd packages.
I seem to recall it being said that the recent change if the pfsync
protocols (which pfflowd uses as its datasource) means that since 4.3
(possibly 4.2,
On 7/16/08, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
anip
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
I most certainly did not write that.
On 2008-07-16, Marco Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I tested relayd in openbsd -current (4.4 beta i think) and it works
fine. now the stupid question: how to compile this version of relayd
for 4.3.
the simple answer: you don't. If you want -current relayd, the
rest of -current comes along
Does anyone here have some experiance with an IBM x335 1u server.
I am looking at a couple of these for use in some basic general
server stuff using OpenBSD but they don't have PS/2 Keyboard
ports. Just some sort of KVM connector called ct2 that I have
never heard of. Would I be able to ingore
16 July 2008 c. 16:41:55 sonjaya wrote:
Dear all,
i have small ups seri APC / Back-UPS ES 525 , how to joint and control
with openbsd , i try using apc-upsd when test not working.
then i try nut but unknown driver.
if any sucsess story can share to me :)
Search mail archives of ports@
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
You could also use a less retarded source control system.
Not my choice, unfortunately, .. almost all of the Rails projects use GIT.
Lee
==
Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for the carpet bombing, I grabbed the list of people who I saw
report problems with rtorrent.
I'm writing to ask those who had problems with rtorrent try it again
with newest
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:16:08PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2008-07-14, Charlie Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that you are unable to view the currently loaded options
for pf using pfctl, even 'pfctl -sa' doesn't show the options
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Tony Abernethy wrote (to tedu@):
Out of curiosity, what happens when you install X but
answer no to the question about intending to RUN X?
... It would install all the C crap and not put startx
in rc, in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
--Siju
I for one am glad there is no plugin for that infectious disease called
flash.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:21:33AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard (TYBRIN Corp.) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Razmus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:58 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 13:33:31 Siju George wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
--Siju
Let me be the first to say--
Who cares?
I may completely disagree with him, but I'm not going to invest in a
flame fest over his comments.
++
-HKS
Let me be the first to say--
Who cares?
I may completely disagree with him, but I'm not going to invest in a
flame fest over his comments.
To each their own.
--STeve Andre'
First of all I would like to say you hello! I have some problems on setting
up a OpenBSD box as gateway for pppoe connection. I'm using a DSL modem running
in bridge mode / well, i try
to use it :) /. PPPOE username/password are 16 character in length and i
believe this is a issue with
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
haha, poor linus cries like a baby coz not everyone is gonna kiss his
ass these days.
of course security is not that important! there
Dear gentlemen (and included list-members),
Let me first introduce myself. My name is Morton Harrow, senior GNU/Linux
consultant in the London metropolitan area. I have been around in the Open
Source world since the early beginning. I am very happy with the spirit and
efforts of the Free Software
snip
I may completely disagree with him, but I'm not going to invest in a
flame fest over his comments.
snip
Being here when Stallman started the last flame nuclear holocaust war,
I feel a weird sense of deja-vu right now.
* asd asd wrote:
First of all I would like to say you hello! I have some problems on
setting up a OpenBSD box as gateway for pppoe connection. I'm using a DSL
modem running in bridge mode / well, i try
to use it :) /. PPPOE username/password are 16 character in length and i
believe this
Nathan Rickerby escreveu:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:16:08PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2008-07-14, Charlie Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that you are unable to view the currently loaded options
for pf using pfctl,
*yawn* linus' opinion is as interesting as his relevance.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:03:31PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
--Siju
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Siju George wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
To me, security is important. But it's no less important than
everything *else* that is also important! I.e. there are no shades
of gray in import hence
From http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
I think the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys
Well, shit, he's got ME nailed...
--
Systems Programmer, Principal
Electrical Computer Engineering
The University of Arizona
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eheh he's right :-) If you guys get your heads out of your asses and
actually read his words with the use of some common sense you might
get what he means. It's a balanced opinion.
From what i've seen so far in this list, the BSD-crowd *is* a bunch
of masturbating monkeys anyway, i get much more
Denis Doroshenko escreveu:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
haha, poor linus cries like a baby coz not everyone is gonna kiss his
ass these days.
of
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Morton Harrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gentlemen (and included list-members),
Let me first introduce myself. My name is Morton Harrow, senior GNU/Linux
Hmmm... something is telling me this message won't have a happy end.
consultant in the London
We have that already.
/*
* Copyright (c) CCYY YOUR NAME HERE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
* purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
* copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all
* Denis Doroshenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
haha, poor linus cries like a baby coz not everyone is gonna kiss his
ass these days.
of course
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
To me, security is important. But it's no less important than
everything *else* that is also important! I.e. there are no shades
of gray in import hence importance is black-and-while. H...
IMO,
debian users are masturbating amoebas
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:47:54PM +0100, Nuno Magalh??es wrote:
Eheh he's right :-) If you guys get your heads out of your asses and
actually read his words with the use of some common sense you might
get what he means. It's a balanced opinion.
From
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 7/15/08, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm sending an email to misc when a package depends on X that should
**NOT** depend on X. That's what's broken, obviously, if you're saying I
should be installing X on a production server. NOT.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Nuno Magalhces
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it's rtfm and chest-thumping.
because here, many people have spent many hours making sure tfm gives
you all the information you need
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
I like to think OpenBSD attracts the kind of people that come up with
their own opinions from their own experiences and don't invest
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
anip
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
The parallel argument is that if any GUI tool has a command line
helper function, then that
Does anyone have any information on contacting/ordering a PC Weasel?
Their Website:
http://www.realweasel.com/
...is still up, but an inquiry sent to info@ last week is still
unanswered. According to a Calgary operator, the number listed on the
Website is no longer in service, searching
Nuno MagalhC#es wrote:
From what i've seen so far in this list, the BSD-crowd *is* a bunch
of masturbating monkeys anyway
I'm not a monkey.
Dear list-members, (*
let me introduce myself. My name is Reyk Floeter, OpenBSD hacker from
the Hannover area. I have been around in the Open Source world since
a while. I am very happy with the spirit and efforts of the OpenBSD
project (www.openbsd.org).
As the name mentions Open, one would
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Chris Smith wrote:
pass log quick all flags S/SA keep state tagged natted
Just to clarify my thinking - the packet has to be passed in before it
can be natted which applies, in your case, the natted tag, changing the
above to a pass out rule and then add a pass in
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:08:51PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 7/15/08, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm sending an email to misc when a package depends on X that should
**NOT** depend on X. That's what's broken, obviously, if
Hello everyone,
Can someone here shed some light on why my vmstat might have negative
values? If I understand the manpage correctly (and Henning and Phillipp's
paper on tuning), these values are nonsensical:
$ vmstat wd0 wd1 sd0
procs memorypagedisks
On 7/16/08, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was mentioned earlier that there is a non-X version in ports - why
don't the maintainers FIX the problem and make that the package instead of
all this bitching about why people compain about broken packages?
The problem was fixed months
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn't fix the main problem, however, .. a version control package
should NOT be in packages as an X flavor.
It was mentioned earlier that there is a non-X version in ports - why
don't the maintainers FIX the
Oh he now develops code? I thought that ended somewhere in in '95.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:45:23PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Denis Doroshenko escreveu:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Marco Peereboom escreveu:
Oh he now develops code? I thought that ended somewhere in in '95.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:45:23PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Denis Doroshenko escreveu:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of L. V. Lammert
It was mentioned earlier that there is a non-X version in ports - why
don't the maintainers FIX the problem and make that the package
instead
of
all this bitching about why people compain about broken packages?
Hrm . . .
From: Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc misc@openbsd.org
Subject: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Just to be clear:
The process we follow to increase security is simply a
2008/7/16 Nuno MagalhC#es [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eheh he's right :-) If you guys get your heads out of your asses and
actually read his words with the use of some common sense you might
get what he means. It's a balanced opinion.
It's not that it isn't a balanced opinion or that he may be right
From: Marti Martinez
From http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
I think the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys
Well, shit, he's got ME nailed...
--
Systems Programmer, Principal
Electrical Computer Engineering
The University of Arizona
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
Shouldn't GPL versions follow the bright example of TeX, and thus the
next version be 3.1?
On 16-Jul-08, at 12:14 PM, Steve Shockley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a monkey.
Hey but I am! Pass the banana flavoured lube!
Oook oook oook!
Now could we return to useful conversation instead of feeding the
trolls?
-Bob
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:03:00PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
debian users are masturbating amoebas
is this really necessary? and if so why?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
Again a mis representation in pulic?
I like to think OpenBSD attracts the kind of people that come up
At 09:54 PM 7/16/2008 +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn't fix the main problem, however, .. a version control package
should NOT be in packages as an X flavor.
It was mentioned earlier that there is a non-X version
At 09:54 PM 7/16/2008 +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn't fix the main problem, however, .. a version control package
should NOT be in packages as an X flavor.
It was mentioned earlier that there is a non-X version
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Nuno Magalhces [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eheh he's right :-) If you guys get your heads out of your asses and
actually read his words with the use of some common sense you might
get what he means. It's a balanced opinion.
From what i've seen so far in this
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:06:23PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Shouldn't GPL versions follow the bright example of TeX, and thus the
next version be 3.1?
That might converge in some sense. If the end is to be something
like license.template, then we're talking about GPL version theta,
where
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:42:15PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
I always do my homework,
Is the following mindless word-drool about 'put startx into rc'
an example of how you do your homework?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Tony Abernethy
Hi all!
I'm trying to use a Huawei E220 UMTS USB modem on an ALIX, using OpenBSD
Flashdist 20080504.
I have extended the GEODE configuration as follows:
# diff -c /opt/flashdist-20080504/GEODE /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GEODE
*** /opt/flashdist-20080504/GEODE Sun May 4 21:32:07 2008
---
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:24:36PM +0200, Martin Schmitt wrote:
I'm trying to use a Huawei E220 UMTS USB modem on an ALIX, using OpenBSD
Flashdist 20080504.
Please try this with the GENERIC kernel, and report back to us if you
still have a problem.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:31:15 +0800, Morton Harrow said:
I see with pain in my heart that the GPLv3 doesn't actually give the
users of GPLv3 software the liberty and freedom the FSF has been
fighting for. Instead they are forced to play by the strict set of
terms the GPLv3 provides.
You
At 05:23 PM 7/16/2008 -0400, William Boshuck wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:42:15PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
I always do my homework,
Is the following mindless word-drool about 'put startx into rc'
an example of how you do your homework?
Yep, .. though I relied on another post instead
On 7/16/08, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I for one am glad there is no plugin for that infectious disease called
flash.
But then how will I watch Ow! My balls! videos online? What will I do?
-Mark
Greetings All,
At many of you have realized, this is a textbook troll [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet) ]. For my part, I'm
muting this thread and moving on.
--
Cheers!
--zak
- Original Message -
From: Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Morton Harrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GPL version 4
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:06:23 +
Shouldn't GPL versions follow the bright example of TeX, and thus the
next version be 3.1?
Hi Miod,
Most of the people
On 2008-07-16, Ryan McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:24:36PM +0200, Martin Schmitt wrote:
I'm trying to use a Huawei E220 UMTS USB modem on an ALIX, using OpenBSD
Flashdist 20080504.
Please try this with the GENERIC kernel, and report back to us if you
still have
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:31:15AM +0800, Morton Harrow wrote:
In addition to the announcement of the GPLv4, I was trying to discuss
another point.
Piss off.
1) if you read the text of GPL, you will notice that later
versions are explicitly limited to the versions published by FSF.
Morton Harrow wrote:
Shouldn't GPL versions follow the bright example of TeX, and thus the
next version be 3.1?
To quote Fred Weigel, they should be
3
3.1
3.14
3.141
3.1415
3.14159
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This
Yes it is. To illustrate the stupidity and pointlessness of this all.
Linus is a troll, we know, who cares?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:03:00PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
debian users are masturbating amoebas
is this really
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:45:23PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
| I took the care of reading all the thread. The guy is just asking linus
| why the policy about security bugs isn't being followed. Linus replies
| him telling that he do not want script kiddies to exploit the bugs. He
| even
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I for one am glad there is no plugin for that infectious disease called
flash.
On the other hand, web developers think this thing is hot shit. I
certainly share your sentiment, but having just come from a web
development class where the instructor essentially
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:41:50PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You missed an important philosophical point. In Richard Stallman's
world view, it isn't the user's freedoms that matter, it's the
*software*s freedom.
Oh, great. First poeple bend the term freedom (like FSF does),
then they
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Morton Harrow wrote:
Dear gentlemen (and included list-members),
Let me first introduce myself. My name is Morton Harrow, senior GNU/Linux
consultant in the London metropolitan area. I have been around in the Open
Source world since the early beginning. I am very happy
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
You don't get it, so I'll explain it.
There are a lot of packages in OpenBSD. We can spend time
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:47:54PM +0100, Nuno Magalhces wrote:
Eheh he's right :-) If you guys get your heads out of your asses and
actually read his words with the use of some common sense you might
get what he means. It's a balanced opinion.
It's a totally misinformed opinion.
Quoting
In
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:23:26PM -0400, Daniel W Barowy wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I for one am glad there is no plugin for that infectious disease called
flash.
On the other hand, web developers think this thing is hot shit. I
certainly share your sentiment, but having just come
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
You don't get it, so I'll explain it.
Yes, I DO get it,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
You
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Morton Harrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our planned release date of GPLv4 is 15th September 2008.
That's scary. I'm staying indoors, shutting down any linux/windows
pc's and not leaving the house that day.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:41 PM, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package
is
broken (which, I believe, is the case
At 10:52 AM 7/17/2008 +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, L. V. Lammert wrote:
You know, if you spent 1/10th of the effort that you have wasted ranting
on learning the ports system then you could have modified the port to
place the X11-requiring bits in a subpackage already. It
Most of the people who have replied seem to be missing the point.
I just don't know what you brought the discussion to this mailing
list. If it is of serious concern to you, and if you haven't realized
that he probably won't care (or agree), talk to rms about this.
Either way, it's all your
cri
on jul 11 snapshots now, have gone thru i think 2 or 3 snapshot iterations
since ~early/mid june.
first recorded/noticed incident of the
'uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries' jobby was jun.16th while
running a DEBUG.MP kernel i had made in attempt to catch more info on a
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
