. ifconfig: wpapsk: bad pre-shared key length
ral0: no link . sleeping
ifconfig: wpa-psk blahrg SECRET: bad value
I have found this in wpa-psk(1): The passphrase must be a
sequence of between 8 and 63 ASCII-encoded characters. The
length of the SSID must be between 1 and 32
Andres Salazar wrote:
... based on that this is my PF config: ...
set block-policy drop
Something to consider regarding drop versus reject:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~peterb/network/drop-vs-reject
Regards
-Lars
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:50:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-25, Maurice Janssen maur...@z74.net wrote:
I have an FTP-server (running OpenBSD 4.5-stable) that is only reachable
over IPv6. Passive FTP works fine, but active FTP doesn't seem to work.
I run ftpd from rc.conf.local
Bob Beck wrote:
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly
marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their
email doesn't work
IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T
sys/altq/altq_hfsc.h set to support #define HFSC_MAX_CLASSES 64
what is the maximum value you can use there? kernel did compile with
1024, not sure yet will it work thou, what is the maximum value you have
used ? would it be safe to use something like 2048?
--
Georg Kahest ge...@viatel.ee
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:29:10AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly
marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning when their
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Gregory Edigarov
g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly
marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:43:18AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:29:10AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly
* irix i...@ukr.net [2009-05-27 06:14]:
May be someone better to write in a kind of pseudo device ifb
may be someone better to do my laundry
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:43:18AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:29:10AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:13:26AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
explanation will follow once you provide the neccesary provide of
ehhh s/provide/proof
huh?
sed: 1: s/provide/proof: unterminated substitute in regular expression
who said I was using sed? vi allows that.
On 27 May 2009, at 10:01, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:43:18AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:29:10AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me
2009/5/27, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de:
may be someone better to do my laundry
you mean you don't have a laundromat yet?
Le 27/05/2009 01:52, Samiuela LV Taufa a icrit :
Simon Morvan wrote the following on 27/05/2009 2:28 AM:Hello all,
I've set up two OpenBSD boxes to act as redundant firewalls in front of
our network and I experience a strange behavior :
After a couple of hours/days one of the box stop
On Friday 22 May 2009 18:05:16 Jordi Espasa wrote:
Looks like you do not think at all. The reason was told to you, and
you didn't ever tried to do something. You prefer to think instead
of doing, aren't you?
I've fixed the commented conf error already, but it seems that the
FIRST warning
I'd rather run pfsync in its own vlan than over a realtek card. It's
probably not any slower (what could be slower than a realtek...) and
it's not really any less reliable (what use is pfsync if your business
network goes down?)
* Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net [2009-05-27 12:11]:
I'd rather run pfsync in its own vlan than over a realtek card. It's
probably not any slower (what could be slower than a realtek...) and
it's not really any less reliable (what use is pfsync if your business
network goes down?)
oh cut the
Le 27/05/2009 12:08, Jussi Peltola a icrit :
I'd rather run pfsync in its own vlan than over a realtek card. It's
probably not any slower (what could be slower than a realtek...) and
it's not really any less reliable (what use is pfsync if your business
network goes down?)
I tought I'd
2009/5/27 Christopher J. Gibbons cgibb...@dragonfire.dyndns.org:
I found this in the README.OpenBSD for QEMU to be most helpful when doing a
similar sort of thing (plus you get the bonus of not having to run QEMU
as root):
$ sudo sh -c sudo -u $USER qemu -nographic -net nic -net tap,fd=3 \
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:18 -0400, uday wrote:
Hey guys,
A quick question, is there a way to bind services to the carp
interface ? You see I have an ftp-proxy running and I wanted to use
carp since I'm already doing fail-over with PF.
FTP client -- Redundant Firewall w/ftp-proxy --
Hello list,
Are there any plans to support the realtek rtl8187: 8187B wireless chipset?
Is it available in -current?
thanks
--
John
From owner-misc+m85945=martynas=altroot@openbsd.org Wed May 27 15:35:42
2009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com;
s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 15:53 -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
beck@ created the greyscanner Perl script to address the issues you've
highlighted. It does deeper inspection of grey listed senders before
they are white listed. It validates the DNS setup of the sending
server, the validity of the
Simon Morvan gar...@zone84.net wrote:
After a couple of hours/days one of the box stop functioning properly :
no ping, no more SSH access but I still capture CARP avertisement on the
network segments (when it occurs on the master). As a result, when it
happens on the master, the slave does not
On 2009-05-27, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
Or may be remove from altq distinguish incoming traffic or outgoing.
What could box up to the queue as incoming and outgoing.
since queueing only happens at output, that's going to be totally
useless. it's not just a question of how altq
yup; i am writing this email from one. ;-) got it working couple
of months ago but was slac^H^H^H^Hbusy and did not clean it up yet;
which one do you have? usbdevs -v?
oh wow that's great news! I don't have openbsd installed on (the
machine) yet - lack of support for this device was a
2009/5/27, Martynas Venckus marty...@altroot.org:
snip
From: John . comp.j...@googlemail.com
snip
Hello list,
Are there any plans to support the realtek rtl8187: 8187B wireless
chipset?
Is it available in -current?
yup; i am writing this email from one. ;-) got it working couple
of
Le 27/05/2009 15:38, Stuart Henderson a icrit :
I tought I'd better run pfsync over a direct connection rather that
through the switches. In case of failure of a switch, the sync has a
chance to be complete and the failover cleaner, but maybe I'm wrong...
If your firewalls are
On 2009/05/27 16:09, Simon Morvan wrote:
Le 27/05/2009 15:38, Stuart Henderson a icrit :
I tought I'd better run pfsync over a direct connection rather that
through the switches. In case of failure of a switch, the sync has a
chance to be complete and the failover cleaner, but maybe I'm
2009/5/27 Nido n...@foxserver.be:
2009/5/27, Martynas Venckus marty...@altroot.org:
snip
From: John . comp.j...@googlemail.com
snip
Hello list,
Are there any plans to support the realtek rtl8187: 8187B wireless
chipset?
Is it available in -current?
yup; i am writing this email from
From owner-misc+m85949=martynas=altroot@openbsd.org Wed May 27 16:51:34
2009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com;
s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
* Chris Harries ch...@sharescope.co.uk [2009-05-26 10:48]:
it sure beats everyone moaning at me as they cannot read e-mails clearly
marked IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WONT WORK, then moaning
when their email doesn't work
Bob Beck wrote:
IMPORTANT, DO THIS OR YOUR E-MAIL WON'T WORK
snip spam email
2009/5/27 Anton Parol anton.pa...@sun.com:
How does one take advantage of such a good offer, when theres no URL?
The spammer almost certainly did include a URL in his HTML-format
email, but misc's MTA piped the message through demime, and demime's
conversion of the HTML message
Ferienunterkunft
vacation rentals worldwide
* secondcasa.com
* vacation rentals worldwide
* Reuchlinstrasse 23
* 72800 Eningen unter Achalm
* Germania
* Telefono/Telefax +49 (0)7123 2846889/2846892
* E-Mail i...@secondcasa.com
*
Greece
Gentili signore ed egregi signori,
joke accessory=can-opener
Original thread:
http://marc.info/?t=12428629293r=1w=2
Message that Bob replied to, starting a new thread (at least as far as
Gmail is concerned):
The in-reply-to header was correct, just because the subject line
changes doesn't make it a new
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
Hello Misc,
since queueing only happens at output, that's going to be totally
useless. it's not just a question of how altq distinguishes traffic,
you're asking to totally change how altq works.
Okey, i see. But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic
can only outlet Shape , You
That's not *just* funny...it makes my sides hurt.
To others thinking about responding:
Check the OP's email address. Note that it doesn't end with openbsd.org
or similar.
Oh please. like the address coming from openbsd.org matters... It's *email*...
$ dig openbsd.org mx
; DiG
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
Hi sure why not. Here are mine:
Username: lowboot
Password: oten
Bank Account: xxx-007
On 27 May 2009, at 16:54, Bob Beck Via Secure Email wrote:
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
Yes, my passwords are: god, sex and please.
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
Account no. 7337h4x0r5, my SIN is one of omission.
I'm trusting you with these so don't do
I'm an experienced hand with Linux (Gentoo, more recently Arch) and with
FreeBSD. I've recently become interested in OpenBSD and have just done a
test install of 4.5 on an old Thinkpad 600x (650 mhz, .5 Gb, 20 Gb 5400 rpm
disk, 3com Megahertz pcmcia ethernet adapter) for purposes of evaluation.
Jan Stary [h...@stare.cz] wrote:
Does disabling the unused devices (audio, lpt, ...)
make any difference in power consumption?
GENERIC doesn't mention any acpi* so I guess I need to use APM.
Given that there is no hw.setperf, what are my options?
What, 1 watt usage from that CPU is too
You laugh, but I actually had a senior manager (of HR no less) whose
passwords were sex, sexygirl and various permutations of that.
On a post it in her drawer (and no, I will not be drawn into a
discussion of the possible meanings of drawer in the .us vs .uk
versions).
On 5/27/09, Gaby Vanhegan
On 27 May 2009, at 17:38, bofh wrote:
On a post it in her drawer (and no, I will not be drawn into a
discussion of the possible meanings of drawer in the .us vs .uk
versions).
benny-hill
Something about rifling through her drawers
/benny-hill
--
When I die I want to go peacefully in my
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com wrote:
Oh please. like the address coming from openbsd.org matters... It's
*email*...
You seem to have misunderstood my comment.
If e-mail address A is in the set {legit, potentially spoofed}, then
you have to have additional
Update: rsync completed. I brought up X, Firefox, emacs and was downloading
packages when the curse struck again. Little or no response to the mouse.
ctrl-alt F2 got me to a fresh login prompt, but every character I type is
repeated 7 times, so login is impossible. No response to ping and, not
* irix i...@ukr.net [2009-05-27 18:12]:
But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic can only
outlet Shape
i can not understand why you want to shape outlets.
you don't understand that inbound shaping doesn't work because you
have obviously no idea how the network stack works. there
2009/5/28 irix i...@ukr.net:
Okey, i see. But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic
can only outlet Shape , You can say that's silly to try to Shape traffic
that came,
but if it works it's worse than outgoing (if only for tcp) it is not
stupid ?
How do you shape traffic
SJP Lists wrote:
2009/5/28 irix i...@ukr.net:
Okey, i see. But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic
can only outlet Shape , You can say that's silly to try to Shape traffic
that came,
but if it works it's worse than outgoing (if only for tcp) it is not
stupid ?
How do
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 13:12:26 you wrote:
Update: rsync completed. I brought up X, Firefox, emacs and was downloading
packages when the curse struck again. Little or no response to the mouse.
ctrl-alt F2 got me to a fresh login prompt, but every character I type is
repeated 7 times, so
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net wrote:
How do you shape traffic that you have already received? Or to put it
another way, how do you alter the past?
I've always just assigned inbound traffic to the existing outbound
queues. My assumption is that the
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:26 PM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 13:12:26 you wrote:
Update: rsync completed. I brought up X, Firefox, emacs and was downloading
packages when the curse struck again. Little or no response to the mouse.
ctrl-alt F2 got me to a fresh
Hello ,
* irix i...@ukr.net [2009-05-27 18:12]:
But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic can only
outlet Shape
i can not understand why you want to shape outlets.
you don't understand that inbound shaping doesn't work because you
have obviously no idea how the network stack
2009/5/28 Johan Beisser j...@caustic.org:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net wrote:
How do you shape traffic that you have already received? Or to put it
another way, how do you alter the past?
I've always just assigned inbound traffic to the existing outbound
I thought I would update the list with some new info I have now that I
am running a PC engines alix2d2 and OpenBSD 4.5-stable.
When I received the alix board I just swapped the CF card out of my
Soekris net4501 and put it in the alix board. At that time I was running
OpenBSD 4.4-stable. After
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:26 AM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
I've never tried installing OpenBSD on a 600x but I'm a little surprised
that
it isn't working fine.
You're in for a few surprises when you do then. It should work fine,
but there's some ACPI issues that have never been
I have an OpenBSD-current machine running xdm, xdmcp enabled.
If I try to connect to it from a Solaris 9 machine with Xinerama enabled,
I get this in /var/log/xdm.log:
X Error of failed request: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 129 (XINERAMA)
Minor
2009/5/27 Nido n...@foxserver.be:
2009/5/27, Martynas Venckus marty...@altroot.org:
snip
From: John . comp.j...@googlemail.com
snip
Hello list,
Are there any plans to support the realtek rtl8187: 8187B wireless
chipset?
Is it available in -current?
yup; i am writing this email from
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:02 PM, SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net wrote:
Thanks Lars and Johan,
I was trying to highlight to irix that once traffic is received, it is
too late to alter the bandwidth it already used coming in.
In other words, doing it on the incoming is pointless. Thus, as
2009/5/27 irix i...@ukr.net:
Hello Misc,
since queueing only happens at output, that's going to be totally
useless. it's not just a question of how altq distinguishes traffic,
you're asking to totally change how altq works.
Okey, i see. But I can not understand why you are sure that
2009/5/27, John . comp.j...@googlemail.com:
2009/5/27 Nido n...@foxserver.be:
2009/5/27, Martynas Venckus marty...@altroot.org:
snip
From: John . comp.j...@googlemail.com
snip
Hello list,
Are there any plans to support the realtek rtl8187: 8187B wireless
chipset?
Is it available in
Hi All
Here is my situation and I am hoping for a little guidance on this one
I have 2 locations, both with 2 fiber internet connections
I need to setup redundant VPN's between these locations without the use of
BGP.
So, my setup would be something like this
Location A
Firewall 1
Connection
On 2009-05-27, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Assume that you are right and the traffic can Shape only outlet
for what purpose then in other projects (freebsd, linux, netbsd)
including the original altqd opportunity for shaping incoming traffic
via CDNR has been included?
so, let's look at
I was trying to highlight to irix that once traffic is received, it is
too late to alter the bandwidth it already used coming in.
Dropping packets you've already received can have the impact of causing
well-behaved hosts to back off when sending future packets. That's a useful
result in itself,
2009/5/28 Johan Beisser j...@caustic.org:
I was trying to highlight to irix that once traffic is received, it is
too late to alter the bandwidth it already used coming in.
In other words, doing it on the incoming is pointless. Thus, as in
your examples, the logic behind shaping only on the
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:44 PM, SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net wrote:
I know this is an option, but forcing the resending of traffic doesn't
seem to be the most efficient method to me, when I could instead just
shape that same traffic when it leaves another interface.
It's a horrible
66 matches
Mail list logo
